Artistic copyright and trademark laws are weird. Using a couple of examples just to see if I'm getting the general idea, and not trying to get into specific minutia.So the whole copyright in these cases is more about the visuals of the characters/species and/or combination of the names to them. Trademarks? Yeah, they have to protect them or they lose them.
yes those are.Artistic copyright and trademark laws are weird. Using a couple of examples just to see if I'm getting the general idea, and not trying to get into specific minutia.
So, if you draw a tw'lick and call the species tailwalkers you could be in violation? But if you draw a possum and call the species Tw'licks you may not be?
Depends on how close the drawing is of the visual representation of a twi'lek. If they are basically humans painted green/blue/red with two head tentacles (lekku)? That might get a cease and desist letter from the lawyer checking it. Now, if you put them on, let's say someone who looks like a Qivian (face wise)? That's fine as long as the head tentacles aren't called lekku.Artistic copyright and trademark laws are weird. Using a couple of examples just to see if I'm getting the general idea, and not trying to get into specific minutia.
So, if you draw a tw'lick and call the species tailwalkers you could be in violation? But if you draw a possum and call the species Tw'licks you may not be?
Really, you're gonna make fun of my spelling ? Actually, it is totally fair, I suck at spelling and grammar.Now the mispelling you used would be fine as long as the visuals aren't identical
Although, don't think there is anthropomorphic possum, but there is wolverine one >.>Really, you're gonna make fun of my spelling ? Actually, it is totally fair, I suck at spelling and grammar.
Thanks for the response and clarification. And feel free to make a possum race with my "creative" (mis)spelling.
Tone: jovial, laughing, tounge-in-cheek, and self deprecating.
Tone not included in this post:. Meanness, insulting, lack of sympathy, and NTR.
Should I mention that 0.26.0 is rendered? Just need some coding, testing, some dialogue stuff you know the usual things? >.>God damn it Tal!
You need to make longer updates or get them out every 3 days or so!
LOVED 0.25 and the lewd scene? *MUAH! *Chef's kiss!!! Some nice additions to the tower there
And the other (especially THOSE 2 ) additions as well!
Yeah yeah......I'll be patient........Should I mention that 0.26.0 is rendered? Just need some coding, testing, some dialogue stuff you know the usual things? >.>
get out of here you pinocchio.Yeah yeah......I'll be patient........
there was a lawsuit in my country where apple tried to du some foodstuff producers for calling one product simply apple (it was even mail ch more then a indication of the flavour). They lost in a landslide, because their trademark is not registered for foodstuff but only techstuff and is not even eligible for registration for foodstuff…Depends on how close the drawing is of the visual representation of a twi'lek. If they are basically humans painted green/blue/red with two head tentacles (lekku)? That might get a cease and desist letter from the lawyer checking it. Now, if you put them on, let's say someone who looks like a Qivian (face wise)? That's fine as long as the head tentacles aren't called lekku.
But possum and calling the twi'lek is fine in most western countries. Someone may get anal about it, unless it is trademarked there is little they can do about it, but it isn't copyright breach as names can't be copyrighted. Now the mispelling you used would be fine as long as the visuals aren't identical
But it is one of those things with names. Is it worth the hassle? There are more nuances to it, and some local law variants with things (which should be checked by a lawyer who knows the local laws). And it doesn't necesarily show originality. Except your version of the name you used, it's just inspired at best
I mean, that's just general bs regarding to copyright, trademark and patent laws. Those laws are in serious need of expert reforms, that aren't influenced by the major right owners, in pretty much every country. Currently they stiffle innovation and competition and give rights owners way more rights than they were intended originally do.there was a lawsuit in my country where apple tried to du some foodstuff producers for calling one product simply apple (it was even mail ch more then a indication of the flavour). They lost in a landslide, because their trademark is not registered for foodstuff but only techstuff and is not even eligible for registration for foodstuff…
The codex is dynamic, from the main menu it is in its default state. If you load the save it reflects the status of that save, thus those who are in relationship turn to lovers.Why is it that the codex now lists all the female main characters as single - when in previous updates they were already listed as lovers?
that's the problem with monthly updates.... version 0.26 almost done and i am still waiting for 0.25...
that will be released in 3 days
patience is a virtue