ChrisHaze

Active Member
Nov 12, 2018
531
524
263
Here is a gallery unlocker, won't work for future updates but it'll work for v0.8. Also fixed a bug where choosing the Stephi dressing room bj/boobjob in the gallery would cause a crash

installation: drag n drop into `game/` folder

for BaiBai if u see this: the bug was "d6s5v2brp" should be "d6s6v2brp"

btw the Stephi beach scene where mc is choking her gets kinda dark tbh, take that as a warning cos I certainly didn't expect it :p
cannot use this. It just opens the file in my broswer and dragging and dropping just makes a link in the game folder. Can you help me?
 

NULLWIZARD

Member
Feb 13, 2020
114
437
258
cannot use this. It just opens the file in my broswer and dragging and dropping just makes a link in the game folder. Can you help me?
Sure: in the post with the mod file, click the file and that should open a new tab. In the new tab, right click to open a context menu and then choose "Save as ..." (wording may be different based on your browser) and then name the file as "galleryUnlock.rpy". After you've downloaded it, you have to move the file into the game/ folder - note that the folder is literally named "game" (sometimes people get confused and put it in the "TwistedMemories" folder instead of the folder named "game")

If the mod doesn't seem to be working then it might've accidentally been saved as a .txt even if you named it as galleryUnlock.rpy when saving. To fix that, you would:
1) right click the file in the folder navigation program
2) choose rename
3) delete the .txt suffix
4) relaunch game
 
Last edited:

AnotherLurker

Member
May 19, 2017
294
754
295
Just fuck her harder till her jealousy drains out of her little slut brain, she'll love being a haremette soon enough.
Basically this, since it's an h-game and the MC is pulling a Heel-Face-Turn from an Ugly Bastard to Hentai Protagonist. The only thing in-universe that would raise his power levels even further would be if he got a haircut that obscured his eyes.

Slightly more realistically...exclusivity doesn't mean the same thing to men and women. For men, it's fear of paternity fraud and wasting resources on someone else's nut. It's a necessity in all but a few circumstances. For women, exclusivity is about getting as much attention and resources out of a guy as she can; if 10% of the MC's attention makes her feel twice as good and gives her a life twice as fulfilling as a guy who's loyal, she's going to stay and share.

If the MC slings dick like a Netorare Antagonist, rizzes them like a Hentai Protagonist, pulls in crazy earnings with that potion business, and manages (because plot) to be there for them whenever they need him, then he's not really going to have any competition. Few men can compete with that kind of FrankenChad. Which means, rather than ditch him for some random guy they can monopolize, the girls in his life would try to thin the harem instead. And, as you pointed out, the MC can handle that infighting by whipping out his hammer and nailing the problems.
 

Alandir

Active Member
Aug 18, 2021
947
1,875
267
Basically this, since it's an h-game and the MC is pulling a Heel-Face-Turn from an Ugly Bastard to Hentai Protagonist. The only thing in-universe that would raise his power levels even further would be if he got a haircut that obscured his eyes.

Slightly more realistically...exclusivity doesn't mean the same thing to men and women. For men, it's fear of paternity fraud and wasting resources on someone else's nut. It's a necessity in all but a few circumstances. For women, exclusivity is about getting as much attention and resources out of a guy as she can; if 10% of the MC's attention makes her feel twice as good and gives her a life twice as fulfilling as a guy who's loyal, she's going to stay and share.

If the MC slings dick like a Netorare Antagonist, rizzes them like a Hentai Protagonist, pulls in crazy earnings with that potion business, and manages (because plot) to be there for them whenever they need him, then he's not really going to have any competition. Few men can compete with that kind of FrankenChad. Which means, rather than ditch him for some random guy they can monopolize, the girls in his life would try to thin the harem instead. And, as you pointed out, the MC can handle that infighting by whipping out his hammer and nailing the problems.
LMAO, maybe cool it with the mysogynistic framing here. Exclusivity is much more important to women than to men. In a nomadic hunter/gatherer society (where most of the base human instincts come from) if she is heavily pregnant and unable to work and he left for some other women, she's gonna die.

It doesn't matter too much anyway because it's a power fantasy harem game, realism isn't what's important, the characters and story are. Concerning Stephanie I think the biggest hurdle in her harem acceptance yet, are the abandonment issues she has had from her mother leaving. And if she's absolutely sure that he won't leave her no matter what, she won't mind other women. He's already fairly close in seduction route I would say. The corruption route might end up more in the "fuck her brains out" direction, though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Master of Puppets

AnotherLurker

Member
May 19, 2017
294
754
295
LMAO, maybe cool it with the mysogynistic framing here. Exclusivity is much more important to women than to men. In a nomadic hunter/gatherer society (where most of the base human instincts come from) if she is heavily pregnant and unable to work and he left for some other women, she's gonna die.
So, before I answer this, I have to acknowledge this:
It doesn't matter too much anyway because it's a power fantasy harem game
Absolutely correct, thanks for not losing sight of that. Now, back to the thing...

It's interesting that you bring up evolutionary psychology, yet also call my framing misogynistic. Evolution doesn't care about morality, "fairness," or cruelty. Evolution asks one and only one basic question before all other factors come into play: "Will this organism survive long enough to reproduce?"

So when you call my framing misogynistic what I think you really mean is, "You're not allowed to talk about women unless I agree with you." Which is gross. Knock that off. But to engage with the story you're telling, there's an easy way out for this woman: cheat. The genetic record shows that there are half as many male ancestors as female ancestors. Is it also misogynistic of me to know that and point it out?

I went ahead and wrote a lot more out on that subject (evolutionary history/psychology), but remembered that this post has pretty decent odds of getting deleted for being off-topic as it is. So, to keep it concise, here's a few bullet points:
>I do, in fact, happen to think poorly of women as a cohort in many 1st-world nations.
>I happen to think poorly of several cohorts where crime, health, spending, and politics are concerned (and I doubt you're any different).
>Thinking poorly of these groups does not mean I wish them harm or intend to deny them basic courtesy and human dignity.
>I attempt to judge every person that I meet on an individual basis based on the content of their character.

These points, despite claims to the contrary, are not mutually exclusive. The first, despite claims to the contrary, does not make me "one who displays prejudice or looks down upon women," as a quick web search defines misogynist. Just as the last, also despite claims to the contrary, does not make me racist, prejudiced, or bigoted.

Now, to follow your example and make a token effort to discuss the game:

I'm turned off by the loli content. More than personal preference, I think that's a hell of a lot harder to justify in-game than having multiple lovers; if they're in the harem, everyone else in the harem who knows about it is now an accomplice to an act that ranges from criminal to distasteful depending on the legal setting and a few other variables. Sure, it's fictional and everyone is somehow of age (even when indicated otherwise), but it thoroughly disappointed me that "opting out" was really just "we'll skip over this, but it's still happening and people will reference dialogue you never read there later on."

I'd also gripe about romancing family members being as overused as the isekai genre, but incest is kind of a staple in these games. I think it's because devs don't want to make the MC's family members ugly or annoying, and if a character is hot then players are going to want the MC to bang them, but there's a lot of complications in this nascent harem: some characters are related, some are married (unhappily), in relationships (unhappily), and they all want different things out of a partner based on where they are in their lives. For them to be happy with the MC, even in a harem, I think they're going to need some way to tie their daily lives together outside of the odd booty call and the occasional heart-to-heart. As the potion business expands, it might be worthwhile to try and swing some of the girls a job there somehow. It's been a while since I've played, but I may need to run through it again to see what the LIs are interested in--someone might be interested in research, or learning from the old man, while some might be interested in sales, the business, logistics, or management side of things. PR, maybe.

Or maybe I should just shut my brain off and enjoy the renders, animations, pretty backgrounds, and dialogue.
 

Alandir

Active Member
Aug 18, 2021
947
1,875
267
It's interesting that you bring up evolutionary psychology, yet also call my framing misogynistic. Evolution doesn't care about morality, "fairness," or cruelty. Evolution asks one and only one basic question before all other factors come into play: "Will this organism survive long enough to reproduce?"

So when you call my framing misogynistic what I think you really mean is, "You're not allowed to talk about women unless I agree with you." Which is gross. Knock that off. But to engage with the story you're telling, there's an easy way out for this woman: cheat. The genetic record shows that there are half as many male ancestors as female ancestors. Is it also misogynistic of me to know that and point it out?
I called it mysogynistic framing, because you framed exclusivity in a misogynistic way. Your argument was that women's only care in a relationship is extracting as much ressources from men as possible. You directly said that and that is misogynistic.
The other part of your argument was that men need exclusivity from women to ensure that the children are theirs. That's where my argument of evolutionary psychology came from because that's clearly where yours came from.
And of course evolution doesn't care about morality, but my argument wasn't about morality, so I don't know why you brought it up.
In what way do you think cheating solves the situation for women in any way? In order to reproduce, they need longterm support. During pregnancy they cannot take care of themselves, after pregnancy they need to make sure that the child survives and grows up healthy. That's why women have just as much need of exclusivity, because they needed a partner who was fully commited to keeping their family going. Cheating doesn't help or solve any of these problems in any way.

And don't worry, you didn't need to tell me that you don't like women. I could tell.
 

AnotherLurker

Member
May 19, 2017
294
754
295
I called it mysogynistic framing, because you framed exclusivity in a misogynistic way.
I said men and woman desire exclusivity for different reasons. You didn't like those reasons...but that's a "you" problem.
Your argument was that women's only care in a relationship is extracting as much ressources from men as possible. You directly said that and that is misogynistic.
Where did I say those words in that order? Even in your first response you said that exclusivity is more important to women than men, not that women wanted more out of a relationship than stability and provisioning.
The other part of your argument was that men need exclusivity from women to ensure that the children are theirs. That's where my argument of evolutionary psychology came from because that's clearly where yours came from.
Desire. Men desire exclusivity for that reason. At least if they're taking the relationship seriously. Dating apps and STD statistics show that men are happy to forgo exclusivity in certain (short-term, low-to-no investment) circumstances.
And of course evolution doesn't care about morality, but my argument wasn't about morality, so I don't know why you brought it up.
Implicit vs Explicit. You had a problem with my statement because you think it disparages women. You, in turn, tried to disparage me with a label that used to mean something before it was massively overused for political clout and general browbeating. And you knew that, even if you were clearly hoping I wouldn't call you on it.

Where'd you learn to gaslight? You're out of practice.
In what way do you think cheating solves the situation for women in any way?
She's hedging her bets. Look up the term "monkey branch." Also, as you yourself pointed out, men can leave a woman for another woman--if she can steal some other woman's man then she secures the long-term provisioning you're talking about. You think male competition gets nasty? Yikes.
In order to reproduce, they need longterm support. During pregnancy they cannot take care of themselves, after pregnancy they need to make sure that the child survives and grows up healthy. That's why women have just as much need of exclusivity, because they needed a partner who was fully commited to keeping their family going. Cheating doesn't help or solve any of these problems in any way.
All of those risks mean they want to bet on a winner, steal the winner if he's with someone else, and/or hedge their bets by having a series of backup plans. Evolutionary psychology gets fairly dark--don't try to cherrypick to make yourself feel better.
And don't worry, you didn't need to tell me that you don't like women. I could tell.
I hate everyone equally and politely until they give me a reason to adjust my expectations above the center line.
Also, these posts are going to be deleted at some point for being off-topic, so feel free to sperg some more.
 

Hugh Janus 88

Member
Sep 19, 2023
248
336
196
I said men and woman desire exclusivity for different reasons. You didn't like those reasons...but that's a "you" problem.

Where did I say those words in that order? Even in your first response you said that exclusivity is more important to women than men, not that women wanted more out of a relationship than stability and provisioning.

Desire. Men desire exclusivity for that reason. At least if they're taking the relationship seriously. Dating apps and STD statistics show that men are happy to forgo exclusivity in certain (short-term, low-to-no investment) circumstances.

Implicit vs Explicit. You had a problem with my statement because you think it disparages women. You, in turn, tried to disparage me with a label that used to mean something before it was massively overused for political clout and general browbeating. And you knew that, even if you were clearly hoping I wouldn't call you on it.

Where'd you learn to gaslight? You're out of practice.

She's hedging her bets. Look up the term "monkey branch." Also, as you yourself pointed out, men can leave a woman for another woman--if she can steal some other woman's man then she secures the long-term provisioning you're talking about. You think male competition gets nasty? Yikes.

All of those risks mean they want to bet on a winner, steal the winner if he's with someone else, and/or hedge their bets by having a series of backup plans. Evolutionary psychology gets fairly dark--don't try to cherrypick to make yourself feel better.

I hate everyone equally and politely until they give me a reason to adjust my expectations above the center line.
Also, these posts are going to be deleted at some point for being off-topic, so feel free to sperg some more.

Someone bring a trophie to this fine gentleman. Not everyone has mercy and patience to debate a boring woke
 

YungKimmy

Newbie
Jun 19, 2021
40
72
141
I said men and woman desire exclusivity for different reasons. You didn't like those reasons...but that's a "you" problem.

Where did I say those words in that order? Even in your first response you said that exclusivity is more important to women than men, not that women wanted more out of a relationship than stability and provisioning.

Desire. Men desire exclusivity for that reason. At least if they're taking the relationship seriously. Dating apps and STD statistics show that men are happy to forgo exclusivity in certain (short-term, low-to-no investment) circumstances.

Implicit vs Explicit. You had a problem with my statement because you think it disparages women. You, in turn, tried to disparage me with a label that used to mean something before it was massively overused for political clout and general browbeating. And you knew that, even if you were clearly hoping I wouldn't call you on it.

Where'd you learn to gaslight? You're out of practice.

She's hedging her bets. Look up the term "monkey branch." Also, as you yourself pointed out, men can leave a woman for another woman--if she can steal some other woman's man then she secures the long-term provisioning you're talking about. You think male competition gets nasty? Yikes.

All of those risks mean they want to bet on a winner, steal the winner if he's with someone else, and/or hedge their bets by having a series of backup plans. Evolutionary psychology gets fairly dark--don't try to cherrypick to make yourself feel better.

I hate everyone equally and politely until they give me a reason to adjust my expectations above the center line.
Also, these posts are going to be deleted at some point for being off-topic, so feel free to sperg some more.
Respect the way you handled that guy. The tone differences between you two were very different. He's very sarcastic. A woke gooner white knighting on a porn game pirateing website. jeez.
 

abyss_kaiser

Newbie
Feb 28, 2021
31
68
107
Can we get away from the real life politics this is shifting into and back into discussion of the game.

And yes, this is all very political and relevant, don't go making any excuses, let's move on.


How abouts we dream about the ideal corruption path for Viktoria? Mhmm~ Oh the things one can warp a childhood friend into, oh the potential!!!
 

YungKimmy

Newbie
Jun 19, 2021
40
72
141
Can we get away from the real life politics this is shifting into and back into discussion of the game.

And yes, this is all very political and relevant, don't go making any excuses, let's move on.


How abouts we dream about the ideal corruption path for Viktoria? Mhmm~ Oh the things one can warp a childhood friend into, oh the potential!!!
Ye, out of the girls that go to school with the MC I like Viktoria the most. I'm just biased because I love Tsundere's. I have a feeling that her corruption and seduction route will heavily tie into Stephanie or Catherine's story line because Viktoria is jealous. I want Viktoria's corruption to be slow and sweet definitely embarassing and get her angry.
 

qljrnt6jc4eh2

Active Member
Jun 27, 2019
672
1,085
263
Any new about an update? I won't dig into Discord and this is probably the only valid source for infos.
 
4.60 star(s) 202 Votes