Unreal Engine Under the Witch [v1.8] [NumericGazer]

3.90 star(s) 102 Votes

funfrancky

New Member
Sep 6, 2019
13
5
for me, the game stop just after the first animation, it's would like loading but but can't run to the first battle with Alice
 

hearmoar

Member
Jul 5, 2018
308
690
As someone who likes feet, I can't stop appreciating how detailed and wrinkled those feet actually were!
 
Nov 9, 2020
129
316
You need to still understand the difference based on the circumstances buddy. People waited a who year for this, do you expect them to keep quiet and say absolutely nothing when it comes out? So yeah, only a few can keep a straight mind and focus on what to report and not tell what they just "feel" about the game.
You see among those "bad criticism" you could only find two examples, even though there are so many posts here since alpha release, because people know, and care. They might start with so called "bad criticism" in the beginning, but after one or two posts, they'll shift their focus on constructive criticism, like addition of Dealer's previous content into this, glitches, physics of the collar in the first cutscene, boob physics, etc.
Try and look at it from a larger perspective, maybe that'll help.
Yeah the circumstance being 'I waited a year to pirate a porngame' which is not the same as 'I supported this game every month for 1 year'. You'll find that the former category of people will tend to provide less constructive criticism than the latter. But you're right, people will initially vent their frustration, and then the actual good criticism will surface.
 
Nov 9, 2020
129
316
Even if the majority is positive that doesn't mean an issue isn't present or relevant. Most people are not physically impaired, so should that mean we don't try to solve the issues they face?

You're comparing the concept of helping people with physical impairment, which cannot be ignored for moral reasons, to catering to a majority which prefer a fetish over another in a porn game. I therefore don't think this comparison is valid.

Helping people with disability =/= creating scenes that are not preferred by the majority in a porn game, even though to you the concept seems similar.
Did I say the game was not advertised as femdom? XD I will clarify: If the game was advertised as femdom and it contained only feet content, then 'only feet' criticism would be valid. This is not the case - as in - the game is advertised as femdom and it contains a lot of other content.
 

Julius

Member
Jul 9, 2017
288
672
Yeah the circumstance being 'I waited a year to pirate a porngame' which is not the same as 'I supported this game every month for 1 year'. You'll find that the former category of people will tend to provide less constructive criticism than the latter. But you're right, people will initially vent their frustration, and then the actual good criticism will surface.
Again, stop trying to gatekeep/paywall criticism. Not paying for something doesn't mean that what I or others say isn't valid. If that were the case, every single YouTube video would be free from criticism.
 
Nov 9, 2020
129
316
Again, stop trying to gatekeep/paywall criticism. Not paying for something doesn't mean that what I or others say isn't valid. If that were the case, every single YouTube video would be free from criticism.
You're missing the point, yet again. I'm saying it's no coincidence that the people who pay provide more constructive criticism. As I said before, constructive criticism is welcome from anyone, but it's interesting that most (I emphasise most, because there are obviously people who pay and give 'bad criticism') unhelpful criticism comes from horny dudes who are wining because they only got to fap for 10 minutes for free.
 
Last edited:

Superman007

Member
Oct 27, 2020
329
1,097
jkevlar you missed the point by an inch again. When you pay for something, you either express your feelings truly, because well, you paid for it, and you want it to become what you expected, or, you think from other perspectives in an effort to make your brain understand that what you are getting is worth what you paid for and it is what you should expect and that you should only give none to only few suggestions about some really prominent problems (Insert any blind ToT patreon for reference). Keep this in mind that you have full right to express what you were expecting and also how you felt bad when it didn't turn out that way.

There are two types of people who'll complain, one, those who are just a bit annoyed, and so they tell what they were expecting, but only once. (If you are seeing a lot of such (non constructive) complaints, then that is not because a few people are spamming them, but because there are just a lot of people who want to post. They don't think that if only one person posted that "content is less" then they shouldn't, they want to say the same thing again, but that isn't spamming, they are saying it only once! You are just seeing a lot of those people, that's it.)

Now, you yourself said this:
people will initially vent their frustration, and then the actual good criticism will surface.
Which means you know that can be, and is true.
Simply put, when a large number of people are allowed to tell what they don't feel right in the game, or what their suggestions are, only the ones who are serious and have given some thought into the suggestion will remain till the end, while those who just felt a bit annoyed and complained, won't keep doing it forever.
So there you have it, the result is constructive criticism, and suggestions that make a great game (because UTW is one) even better for both patreons and us.

Edit: This is the last time I'll post something like this here, the thread is still quite clean, and I don't want my opinions to make it messy or toxic for anyone else. I just have a bad habit of writing, so I am sorry.
 
Nov 9, 2020
129
316
jkevlar you missed the point by an inch again. When you pay for something, you either express your feelings truly, because well, you paid for it, and you want it to become what you expected, or, you think from other perspectives in an effort to make your brain understand that what you are getting is worth what you paid for and it is what you should expect and that you should only give none to only few suggestions about some really prominent problems (Insert any blind ToT patreon for reference). Keep this in mind that you have full right to express what you were expecting and also how you felt bad when it didn't turn out that way.

There are two types of people who'll complain, one, those who are just a bit annoyed, and so they tell what they were expecting, but only once. (If you are seeing a lot of such (non constructive) complaints, then that is not because a few people are spamming them, but because there are just a lot of people who want to post. They don't think that if only one person posted that "content is less" then they shouldn't, they want to say the same thing again, but that isn't spamming, they are saying it only once! You are just seeing a lot of those people, that's it.)

Now, you yourself said this:

Which means you know that can be, and is true.
Simply put, when a large number of people are allowed to tell what they don't feel right in the game, or what their suggestions are, only the ones who are serious and have given some thought into the suggestion will remain till the end, while those who just felt a bit annoyed and complained, won't keep doing it forever.
So there you have it, the result is constructive criticism, and suggestions that make a great game (because UTW is one) even better for both patreons and us.

Edit: This is the last time I'll post something like this here, the thread is still quite clean, and I don't want my opinions to make it messy or toxic for anyone else. I just have a bad habit of writing, so I am sorry.
Haha you really went for a few paragraphs, so I won't waste your time. I agree that people will only comment if they feel very strongly about something. I however still think that even if you pay for something, if it truly doesn't satisfy you, you won't force yourself to like it just because you paid for it. Have a good day, nice having this convo.
 

Behappy69

Active Member
Nov 3, 2020
821
447
I must say it has amazing graphics maybe the best I have seen. I winced when I saw my MC who is called hero have his dick stomped on by his sister who you have to fight ,also I couldnt see anyway to win I am sure it is meant to be that way. I am not a masochist but this hero MC is and I not a fan of that. But even saying that just to see the animations in this game I will keep an eye on it. If there is ever a way for the hero to be played as a Hero who can have his way with at least some of the girls. As well as the SUB option which I think it is meant to be played as. I would even consider Supporting this game but they will do as they wish. Which means it will most likely stay with the MC being submissive. P.S. The option to play as Dom Male hero as well Would be Great hint hint nudge nudge
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Truemourne

FirionKaiser

Newbie
Sep 24, 2017
72
64
Little update, I managed to system restore my laptop and now I can play the game again since it got rid of the updated AMD.
 

BakedAlaska

New Member
Nov 11, 2017
5
0
instructions unclear, I've been "beating it" for a while now and seeing nothing :ROFLMAO:
In the main menu go to collection and then click on alice and then on the right u should see "secret training" right above the scenes you've already unlocked for her click on that and you should see the other 7 scenes
 

track989

Newbie
Mar 25, 2018
71
109
Then you still don't have the grounds to say this is disappointing. You can only be disappointed when your expectations are really high. I don't know how you can expect lots of scenes when this is a 3D open world and he is only ONE developer. Even then, he said not all the scenes have been added, which is why this is in ALPHA.
Minor correction to this point, the credits list separate people for character modelling, rigging, and animation, not to mention character design + voice + translations + music though most of those have some degree less direct involvement in core dev work.

Anyway, very technically impressive 2nd demo. It'll be a miracle if such a small team working in UE manages to implement even a quarter of what they clearly seem to have planned, though, with all the map/objective/world/swimming(?)/inventory features added. Definitely feels like there's (still) an extremely high risk of random feature creep bogging it down even on top of the inherent insane difficulty of accomplishing things in UE.
 
3.90 star(s) 102 Votes