- Aug 10, 2021
- 35
- 51
Personally, I would trade the 3D open world aspect if it meant he can optimise the graphics especially for lower-end PCs. There's a bunch of potential customers lost due to the medium-high requirements, and while it's great the have the scenes recorded in 4K Ultra graphics etc, you lose that interactivity.i got a question for you guys, do you think the game would be better off without 3d open world aspect?
cause like for me personally i dont really care about being able to take a 30 min swim to the other side of the lake in this 24215 terrabyte map that has nothing to do in it. i'm also not here to enjoy the tree graphics or whatever cause tbh there are way better games for that kind of stuff. wouldn't it be better if the creator simply botched the idea of 3d open world n tried to make it like a point and click game? this basically means he doesn't have to spend time making open world & it's many complications but can directly focus on what most of us are here for: sex scenes & maybe more story instead. the game would probably be better optimised as well so your computer doesn't burn.
3d can still exist for fighting and sex scenes, this means they just have to do tiny map scenarios where these events take place instead of gigantic interactive 3d world. (Like a simple mini map of just the inside of alices room for example.)
but what do u guys think?
If Numeric REALLY wants a 3D space, then a mini-hub is preferred. For example, Herba's cave doesn't need to be a million miles up in the mountains.