- Feb 12, 2020
- 10
- 41
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
shemale or dickgirl, not a futa.futa
Wasn't always that way though.shemale or dickgirl, not a futa.
futa means hermaphrodite with penis and vagina.
If a character does not have both penis and vagina then they are not a futa
Thanks for clearing that up. People really need to learn to respect porn terminologies.shemale or dickgirl, not a futa.
futa means hermaphrodite with penis and vagina.
If a character does not have both penis and vagina then they are not a futa
this is simply incorrect. it always from day one meant hermaphrodite.Wasn't always that way though.
It's been more of relatively recent thing (most likely people in the western world) to have it be for a specific thing i.e. fantasy hermaphroditism, instead of also including trans/shemale.
In this case, they're futa because that's what they're called. It's not likely to change any time soon.
So you're saying that things have always been a certain way, but contradicting yourself at the same time with "even if you were somehow right"this is simply incorrect. it always from day one meant hermaphrodite... Also, even if you were somehow right
You're absolutely correct, but unfortunately most people on this either don't give a damn or hardly grasp the English language (or both). This site grouping futa and trans in one tag is not helping either.This should not be called futa / hermaphrodite content because none of them have both a vagina and a penis on the same person.
face meet palm.So you're saying that things have always been a certain way, but contradicting yourself at the same time with "even if you were somehow right"
Oh you are contradicting yourself... Allow me to educate you on why.face meet palm.
No, I am not contradicting myself, nor being a politician.
No, I have not eliminated the absoluteness of my statement.You made a statement that was an absolute - "It's always been this way", then applied the contradiction through adding the nice little ass-covering of "even if you were somehow right" on the off-chance that you were wrong, which eliminates the absolute nature of your statement.
I'm arguing about what amounts to the same level of substance as what you've argued with me...You are not even arguing about anything of substance right now.
This is called playing devils advocate, he didnt admit that he is wrong he just pointed out that you are wrong on multiple points by moving the thought train forwards wich requires him to make up a hypothetical scenario in wich you where right.Oh you are contradicting yourself... Allow me to educate you on why.
You made a statement that was an absolute - "It's always been this way", then applied the contradiction through adding the nice little ass-covering of "even if you were somehow right" on the off-chance that you were wrong, which eliminates the absolute nature of your statement.
Next time, think before you write a load of rubbish!
No, it isn't.This is called playing devils advocate