Ren'Py What a Legend! [v0.7.05] [MagicNuts]

[john_demans]

no way we have people ITT doing more hardcore calculations on the devs’ hypothetical rent than i have ever done for my own rent

 

[Porthas]

They're earning around $95k USD a year not really releasing a game. Why would they ever finish this? lol.

The financial incentive to finish a project is extremely low, if not entirely non-existent.

 

[whichone]

So all I'm saying that if they're earning a decent salary working this slowly, why would they ever finish this game. Sure, they might be working 6 days a week but if they're only working 4 hours every day, that's a great life for them!

To ensure that they can continue earning a decent salary doing something that they enjoy for a living.

You talk as if their support will unconditionally remain. It won't.
If they do what you're suggesting & just string patrons along, they won't be able to make a living from it for very long.
If they ensure that what they deliver is good & justifies the wait (along with the already accepted justification for the delay, caused by two operations & a new child), then their existing patrons remain happy.

The financial incentive to finish a project is extremely low, if not entirely non-existent.

Finshing a project is not exactly necessary & doesn't need to be the goal, for these types of games.
If they can come up with new stories, new areas to explore, etc, why does the project need to end?
As long as they can maintain their own interest in telling a story & keep coming up with fresh ideas that keep players engaged, "finishing a project" is really not necessary.

How many times have you reached the end of an enjoyable game & wished there was more of it? I can think of a good few.

 

[Porthas]

To ensure that they can continue earning a decent salary doing something that they enjoy for a living.

You talk as if their support will unconditionally remain. It won't.
If they do what you're suggesting & just string patrons along, they won't be able to make a living from it for very long.
If they ensure that what they deliver is good & justifies the wait (along with the already accepted justification for the delay, caused by two operations & a new child), then their existing patrons remain happy.

Only if you're not capable of long-term thinking, or not interested in etsablishing a good reputation.

From what I've seen, even dev's with a bad "reputation" still rake in a lot of patron money. People complain about that all the time.

Regardless, any patron dev can change their username and start a new, interesting looking project and start the cycle all over again.

These devs may end up being honest, conscientious developers and finish their project. Nice honest people exist. I still think the patron financial model is flawed and doesn't offer incentive to finish projects. It's what I've observed after watching the situation for several years now.

 

[wikiflikijustin]

I assume you've never worked yourself and earned any money, and you're probably still living in your parents house with all the commodities and have now family your own? Well, in that case getting almost $100k a year seems to be much, I agree.

But first of all: they don't get ~$100k. Nor $95k. They have to pay taxes and shit. As they're located in Spain, the average living costs in Spain for a family of four is about $2.4k per month without rent (

You must be registered to see the links

). That's $30k a year -- again: without rent! The average rent in Spain is about $1k to $1.5k depending on where you live (same source as above). That's another $12k-$18k a year. Now we're already up to about $45k to $50k a year they have to spend on expenses, just to enjoy a roof over their head and be able to pay for food, and their basic needs (like electricity and stuff). Taking in account the average 40% taxes they'll have to pay on their income (

You must be registered to see the links

), they are left with about $500 to $1k at most per month to spend. I might be wrong about this, it's just a quick 'n dirty calculation.

Both of them are working their butts off (at least 5 days a week, sometimes even 6 days a week!). Have they posted a game update during the last year? No, they haven't -- so what? I'm myself working in IT (software development), and it might take 1-3 years (!) of paid work until a new update is ready! Am I lazy? Am I milking my employer? I wish I could, but I'm getting tracked on a weekly basis, and everyone is OK with the progress we're achieving. MagicNuts are pretty much doing the same: the basically report their progress every week, and eventually the update will be ready and available (even for those who haven't "invested" in their work!).

So what's different between me and MagicNuts? Well, I do have a non-cancelable contract, which guarantees me a certain amount of money per month/year. They don't. So all they got is the voluntary donations they got from people who love their work, and still believe and trust them. But for them it can change every moment, and they get like $1k to $2k less per month... For me it won't change, even if I work slower than usual...

Please feel free to become a freelancer yourself, living just off the humble donations of people who enjoy and love your work. But to be honest, I don't think you'll ever do something like that. You don't have the balls. You'd rather work as a burger-flipper to get just enough money to go out and have some beer with your friends while still living at your mom's house.

why you dickriding them so hard? they dont know who you are and they dont care

 

[whichone]

These devs may end up being honest, conscientious developers and finish their project. Nice honest people exist. I still think the patron financial model is flawed and doesn't offer incentive to finish projects. It's what I've observed after watching the situation for several years now.

So, because you've seen some devs behave like assholes, does that automatically mean that every dev is going to be one?
I've met a few con-men, it doesn't mean that I automatically assume every person I meet is one.
I'd suggest judging them by their own actions, rather than by generically applying the actions of the worst minority of others.

Of course it doesn't offer incentive to finish projects. It never claimed to, that's not what a patron does.
A patron supports the artist. Yes, that continued support is largely dependant upon projects being finished, but it is not a defining factor in being a patron.

As I said, these games don't need to end. If the dev maintains their enjoyment for telling a story & can keep thinking of new ones to tell, within the game's world & the players continue to enjoy\support it, why does it need to finish?

Continuing this game, with new stories, is not actually any different to starting a new game, with a different story.
Except for the fact that you already know that the playerbase likes these characters. So there's no risk with telling more stories with them.

Think of an author who has the same protagonist in 10 novels. e.g. James Patterson: Alex Cross.
If the dev of one of these games did the same amount of story for one MC, that game could quite feasibly never end.
The key thing is that it's only viable as long as people are still happy to pay to support the process.

 

[Porthas]

So, because you've seen some devs behave like assholes, does that automatically mean that every dev is going to be one?
I've met a few con-men, it doesn't mean that I automatically assume every person I meet is one.

I've made this point, purely based on the system itself. I've made no negative (or positive) statements about these developers. Human nature being what it is, we do things mostly on financial incentive. Money is what we need to eat, provide housing, take care of our loved one's, etc. It's why with a project like these, games, I prefer to to offer financial incentive for finished projects.

Of course it doesn't offer incentive to finish projects. It never claimed to, that's not what a patron does.

So we agree then. Considering how many people expect a finished game from these projects, I don't think many people go into sponsoring a project with an attitude that they don't care whether the game is finished or not. It would appear that most people view these patron payments like an investment into a finished product. Like perhaps a Kickstarter campaign.

It's why people get irritated if it looks like all their money went to nothing (an unfinished game) and it's also why, if folks have been donating for a while, they may be reluctant to pull out of a project. They don't want to see something they invested in fail.

 

[Porthas]

Yes & you've just made precisely the correct point: "people expect".
People should understand what they're signing up for & manage their expectations accordingly.
No-one signed up to Patreon to buy a game, regardless of whether they thought they did, or not.

If they spent a bit of time understanding what they were actually doing with their money, instead of assuming what they're doing with it, they wouldn't get so irritated.
Key point of prev: "It never claimed to".
If they expect something they have no right to expect, it's not on anyone else, but them.

The Patreon system is not "flawed". It operates with exactly the same model as patrons have for centuries (as Biscardone showed in his post re. one of Da Vinci's patrons getting annoyed by him working at a snail's pace).

Ultimately it'll become a problem for the entire system as folks slowly catch on that a large portion of these projects never get finished and their expectations don't get met. Then it'll become a large problem for the small developers using this system as involvement drops off. So, whether or not people "should" expect x or y from Patreon, what ultimately matters is a system that satisfies both parties in the exchange.

 

[whichone]

Ultimately it'll become a problem for the entire system as folks slowly catch on that a large portion of these projects never get finished and their expectations don't get met. Then it'll become a large problem for the small developers using this system as involvement drops off. So, whether or not people "should" expect x or y from Patreon, what ultimately matters is a system that satisfies both parties in the exchange.

Doesn't alter the fact.
People should only expect what they're actually entitled to.
It's why most of their arguments get dismissed as "entitled". Because they're moaning about something they had no right to expect & that's on them, no-one else.
It doesn't take much to find out the facts about what they're doing with their money. If they choose not to & believe something else, it's entirely their fault.

The system is not flawed.
It does what it states & that is precisely what it should do, by literal definition of the term "

You must be registered to see the links

".
People assuming what they're signing up for & then finding out it's not what they assumed, does not equate to a flawed system.
It's simply:

 

[Porn_Jesus]

If only this lazy forum would have a filter for words like milking, lazy dev, xx amount of cash/month and so on that would trigger auto deletion of comments.

Wouldn't that be a sight, being spared from the same shit for once without having to either block all the spammers (they multiply, sadly) or entire threads...

 

[moskyx]

Actually, Patreon system is almost perfect, if there's honesty from the artist. Do you want to support an artist lifestyle? You can, just sign up and keep paying until you change your mind about them. Do you want to 'buy' a product? You can, just sign up right after the artist releases something, pay the amount of money you think their creation deserves, and then unsubscribe a second later. In this particular case we have more than enough info to adjust our expectations and choose what to do with our money: a big map, a lot of girls and side stories to tell, a very personal artstyle that takes time to be done, 6 updates released so far (each one bigger and 'slower' than the previous one), and daily reports that show the development pace - so all of us can easily infere this is going to take a while. Sure, all of this lead many people to think it's not worth their money for whatever reason (mine is they're doing more than OK without my financial support - and here you have another bit of info, as they don't hide their income figures as others do), but there are almost 2k people who are happy enough with it to keep funding this project and its creators. And they are not 'wrong' nor fooled into a con, they just have other expectations than those who freely choose not to spend a single buck on this. All I'd hope from non-supporters is to at least be honest and not spread lies or insult the devs and the actual supporters that, in the end, make the game possible and free for all.

 

[whichone]

If only this lazy forum would have a filter for words like milking, lazy dev, xx amount of cash/month and so on that would trigger auto deletion of comments.

Wouldn't that be a sight, being spared from the same shit for once without having to either block all the spammers (they multiply, sadly) or entire threads...

Unfortunately, there's a limit on the number you can block.

 

[Xupuzulla]

If only this lazy forum would have a filter for words like milking, lazy dev, xx amount of cash/month and so on that would trigger auto deletion of comments.

Wouldn't that be a sight, being spared from the same shit for once without having to either block all the spammers (they multiply, sadly) or entire threads...

You want this pirate site to be a echo chamber where the devs only get praise?

 

[whichone]

You want this pirate site to be a echo chamber where the devs only get praise?

No, but neither do I want it to be an echo chamer for invalid criticism that gets trotted out without any valid evidence to support it.
Particularly not when the facts are easily established & contrary to that criticism.

Yes, this episode has taken a long time, but it's the biggest one they've done yet, so it's expected to take a bit longer than the previous ones.
On top of that, they had a new child & Pistachio was hospitalised twice for two operations. Those obviously slow them down considerably.
These devs post a weekly update, so anyone who's not satisfied with the progress can withdraw their support at any time they wish, if the progress does not meet their expectation.
They have offered numerous refunds to patrons.
They give the game away for free.

So baseless accusations of "milking" are just trash.

 

[Xupuzulla]

You can always report posts or ignore users you dont like.
Personally i think filters words is a terrible idea and i hope it never happens.

 

[whichone]

You can always report posts or ignore users you dont like.
Personally i think filters words is a terrible idea and i hope it never happens.

Yes, I agree that an auto-delete function on key words would be awful.
There are absolutely cases where the term "milking" is valid & comments can then serve as a warning to others.

But, when the term is just lazily banded around & applied to games that don't warrant it, it loses that capability of warning, as most will end up ignoring it as they've seen it used so many times without just cause.
It removes the urgency.

 

[TheDevian]

To ensure that they can continue earning a decent salary doing something that they enjoy for a living.

You talk as if their support will unconditionally remain. It won't.
If they do what you're suggesting & just string patrons along, they won't be able to make a living from it for very long.
If they ensure that what they deliver is good & justifies the wait (along with the already accepted justification for the delay, caused by two operations & a new child), then their existing patrons remain happy.

Finshing a project is not exactly necessary & doesn't need to be the goal, for these types of games.
If they can come up with new stories, new areas to explore, etc, why does the project need to end?
As long as they can maintain their own interest in telling a story & keep coming up with fresh ideas that keep players engaged, "finishing a project" is really not necessary.

How many times have you reached the end of an enjoyable game & wished there was more of it? I can think of a good few.

Well, there is one reason to finish, and that is that you can make a LOT more money on Steam and stuff than you can on Patreon, even for a well supported dev. So if you are not using Illusion's art for your game, than finishing it is certainly worth while. If you finish a game, and then start a new one, you will make a lot more than "milking" as so many accuse devs of doing.

 

[DemiMaximoff]

These "patreon is just like the patron system of the past" comments have to stop. Ain't no artist keeping their head if they promise the king paintings every one or two months, and then keep collecting from his treasury without any output for 1.5 years.

Patreon users are not funded by one big rich man. They are funded by many non-rich men, whom, given their financial decisions seen here, are deservedly non-rich

 

[sadly_smashed]

Played it last year. Really good game, very complete. Search it up to see how far it has gone, and, nothing? what hell happened? I just saw a devlog on the other page so it is not abandoned, has every single adult game dev just decided not to finish their games to keep the patreon thing?

 

[FreelancerFL]

5 months later no update, damn they're worse at releasing games than SR7