- Mar 23, 2020
- 1,643
- 2,281
you'll be surprised when Cheeky flips everyone the bird and a harem edning will be the canon endingThen you are in luck sweetness, there is no harem here.
you'll be surprised when Cheeky flips everyone the bird and a harem edning will be the canon endingThen you are in luck sweetness, there is no harem here.
Still being the worst in design damn.. poor ZarahYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Even from a passing comment your Harem Shield still proves flawless!Then you are in luck sweetness, there is no harem here.
why the worst?Still being the worst in design damn.. poor Zarah
If you’re outside USA then fair enough, things may be different in different countries, otherwise you’re talking utter nonsense. Contracts between private parties fall under civil law jurisdiction, not criminal jurisdiction. Under no situation would breach of contract between individual parties be subject to criminal prosecution.That's assuming it goes by RL legal standards.
Although if conditions are breached once funds/estate has been released then it's a breach of contract, I believe it is a material breach but I specialised in employment law, it didn't cover wills I just know it falls under breach of contract I just can't remember which breach it is.
I know will are legally binding contracts and any sort of breach is a pretty big deal and ranges from repayment to jail time.
Either way he'd be fucked.
you can’t have a clause that requires the return of property once the transfer of property has been made. Completely unenforceable. There can be conditions, contractual obligations as part of the initial transfer, regarding the “sell-on” of real estate or material property, including a claim to the proceeds of any future transfer of the asset. that is totally different from a transfer of cash or other forms of liquidity. You couldn’t enforce a clause that says something like “you met my terms, you get the million dollars, but if you visit my friend you have to give it back.” No way.Let's say Mc goes to live in the beach house and meets the conditions of the will, away from Monica Kate and Jenna and spends all the money and once spent back to Monica and daughters, who could bother him?
If he receives the money it means that he has fulfilled all the requirements of the will and that as I said before if he donates his money (fake) to Zara what would a private investigator who is also private do to me.
Once I've satisfied the conditions the money is mine and if I make the money disappear, I've told Dad to fuck off.
Unless there is a clause requiring the money to be returned if I, after receiving it, violate the provisions of the will.
If you’re outside USA then fair enough, things may be different in different countries, otherwise you’re talking utter nonsense. Contracts between private parties fall under civil law jurisdiction, not criminal jurisdiction. Under no situation would breach of contract between individual parties be subject to criminal prosecution.
Your will:
- is a legally binding document;
Why would I be wrong, I only repeated what Ace said and he works on the game.don't worry... I'm certain that Avaron is as wrong as Katie's ex when he thought Katie was going to give him a bj...
I don’t contest they are legally binding, of course they are. Subject to criminal prosecution (possible jail time was mentioned), no chance. That was my point.You must be registered to see the links.
A will isn't a contract between individual parties, it's a legally binding document detailing what is to happen to a person's estate upon their passing.
You must be registered to see the links
As it stands this will would be contested in court as it breaks public policy.
You must be registered to see the links
Why would I be wrong, I only repeated what Ace said and he works on the game.
I don't say shit for the good of my health, if there are no facts to back it up I won't say it. The devs have said no harem in this game so there is no harem. Everything else i've said is common sense.
Most people have it.
About the money i think the lawyer explained that the maximum possible period by law was 10 years. So basically there will be monthly or yearly payments for 10 years. And i guess if let's say on year 3 they catch you breaching your clause, you lose the rest of the money. There however can be payment plan where you receive 1% the first year, 2% the second, 4% the 3rd and so on. So basically the biggest amount of money is left for the last payment.you can’t have a clause that requires the return of property once the transfer of property has been made. Completely unenforceable. There can be conditions, contractual obligations as part of the initial transfer, regarding the “sell-on” of real estate or material property, including a claim to the proceeds of any future transfer of the asset. that is totally different from a transfer of cash or other forms of liquidity. You couldn’t enforce a clause that says something like “you met my terms, you get the million dollars, but if you visit my friend you have to give it back.” No way.
if the money were put in trust that’s a different situation. But even still, if the trust releases a portion of money to the beneficiary there’s no way they can put conditions to its use, it’s no longer under the Trust’s control. There’s only the possibility/threat of cancelling future disbursements to control the beneficiary’s behavior.
Maybe I've been caught doing a bit too much skipping text, hehe. Even if the money is time-release then what I said stands, they can cut off future disbursements but there's no way to reclaim past transfers.About the money i think the lawyer explained that the maximum possible period by law was 10 years. So basically there will be monthly or yearly payments for 10 years. And i guess if let's say on year 3 they catch you breaching your clause, you lose the rest of the money. There however can be payment plan where you receive 1% the first year, 2% the second, 4% the 3rd and so on. So basically the biggest amount of money is left for the last payment.
Zarah looks much better.
September. Likely late.... but if we finish early, we won't complain and I doubt others will either. We are making good time for how large and relatively complicated this update is, but still choose to pause patreon contributions for the end of this month (we want to get back to a 6 weeks to 2 months cycle to collect full time again). Cheeky posted his dev weekend update saying the same in summary. His next updates will contain teasers and scene details for those patreons interested.Any news about update?
Well...she looks better than that guy.
That guy obviously knows what a real (inner) beauty is...So if he tells he dont like (a new) Zarah I wouldnt doubt him.Well...she looks better than that guy....
I have no issue with him not liking Zarah's new look. Now I'm just going to write the word harem here.That guy obviously knows what a real (inner) beauty is...So if he tells he dont like (a new) Zarah I wouldnt doubt him.