I just wanted to inform people about something that happened to me. I don't know if it is just me or what, but I cannot access the game. Whenever I try after unzipping it, Avast anti-virus removes the exe. file, due to it being infected with something called IDG, or IDF Generic. I just wanted to let people know, just in case it is happening to them as well.
- Thread starter UncleVT
- Start date
- Mar 5, 2019
- 657
- 1,285
All I can say is that my version, from a link on the the OP, wasn't infected with anything. It's probably Avast being 'overly cautious' about things that weren't created by a large corporation that paid them millions to have their products whitelisted.
What you can do is tell Avast to leave the file alone so you can access it then submit it to
You must be registered to see the links
for a proper scan. That'll give you a pretty good idea if there's an infection or if your anti-virus is playing tricks on you. (just the executable, not the entire archive - they won't thank you for that!)
- Sep 18, 2022
- 154
- 70
There is this one out called where the heart is v.61 do anyone know where that is is it like the new ?
That's only the date the new beta came out (June 1 => v6.1.2024) since it did not have a specific version number
- Oct 1, 2019
- 2,823
- 3,260
The thing about having to go through this game all over again...
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Jul 26, 2023
- 7,709
- 14,882
And you absolutely know that she will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, let you forget it! She will remind you over and over again. LOL!
- Jul 12, 2020
- 9,985
- 23,101
1. Delete Avast.
2. Just like you have to with Norton, run a full malware scan with cccleaner or AdvancedSysCare to actually remove Avast.
3. Use something else, or just don't bother at all...most are worthless
4.
5. Profit.
- Jul 17, 2021
- 8,886
- 13,568
Malwarebytes is best. Use Revo Uninstaller. It even gets down deep removin shit properly. Unlike those two you mentioned.
For sure the old Don's money isn't worth it if we will have to lose our precious Katie or other LIs, tho i think we will still have the opportunity to both being with girls of choosing and get at least some of that moolah.
Would still do it with Bella or not tho? That is a question.
So you want to hold their hand or gatekeep what others see or can do?
If this is not sheer fucking hubris, I do not know what is. And it is funny that you did not even see the contradiction in your post.
But i think we have established that we are of different opinions, and this discussion is pretty off topic.
- Jul 12, 2020
- 9,985
- 23,101
Once again, I keep repeating this, feel free to search my posts.
if play clever, you can have ANY girl you want and get ALL the money...
- Jul 12, 2020
- 9,985
- 23,101
Or can stop being lazy and search for it. Posted it at least three times.
I never said anything about holding anyone's hands. The fact that I addressed the majority of users here as being idiots should have clued you into that.
I certainly never said or implied gatekeeping anything, but please continue to act as though someone having a different stance on something means they automatically want to control what does and doesn't appear here.
That was established in the very first post of this discussion. Surprised it took your "greatness" so long to see that.
You said you do not post something before it is 100% funcitoning, I said I post it with information so people can make an informed desicion.I never said anything about holding anyone's hands. The fact that I addressed the majority of users here as being idiots should have clued you into that.
I certainly never said or implied gatekeeping anything, but please continue to act as though someone having a different stance on something means they automatically want to control what does and doesn't appear here.
That was established in the very first post of this discussion. Surprised it took your "greatness" so long to see that.
Whereas you replied that most of the users here are idiots, which implies that YOU have to protect/gatekeep the users (or hold their hands), by withholding a version that is not 100%.
Edit: Forgot to add, and now you become condescending, which makes you one of the idiots you mentioned, in my opinion.
No, I never said that.
By all means though, go ahead and show where I said that.
No, it doesn't mean anything of the sort. A statement based on observable facts does not mean something it doesn't state.
You thinking it does, doesn't make it so.
Yet you're still continuing to engage on this subject, gaslighting/lying or just misspeaking, even after you'd finally come to the realisation that we will not agree and this is off-topic. That's usually the time a rational person would have stopped, but clearly you're just "above us all" and we're not worth a second of rationalaity from your ego.
Here is what you said:
Oh yeah, I remember that now. F95's worst April Fool's ever.
It wasn't just Cheeky who was pissed at that, a lot of the fans were too. It genuinely was not funny.
There's such a thing as standards, even when committing crimes. That's why leakers and pirates are terms used independently of each other.
Take the example of Project Myriam then.
Patreon release and a week later a public version that includes more than is in the Patreon version, and is shared here by the dev, on purpose...
The Patreon version gets shared here which leads to people questioning where certain content is that was in the previous version they played that happens to be things Patreon forced Zorlun to remove, and is put back in with the "Prometheus Patch" version from Subscribestar. This happens multiple times with the "usual suspects" complaining about content disappearing in the game and issues with mods designed to work with the later *intended* version, despite the numerous times Zorlun asks for the Patreon version not to be shared here - the Patron(s) who share from Patreon are in fact doing a disservice to the community here, instead of waiting for the "full" version from another site to be released before sharing here.
So, good pirate distributes what is better and intended for release. Bad pirate is a self-important prick who only cares about being the one to do the pirating first regardless of whether or not it's a working product.
What constitutes a version ready for release in your eyes, if you answer that to my post?
Developers release alpha and beta versions all the time. However, according to your responses, those are never ready to be leaked on F95. So, I inferred that you meant a version with 100% functionality.
Also, what did you want to tell me with your statement about idiots? If it has no impact on my statement that I leak everything and let people make their own decisions, why even say anything?
I didn't dispute the fact; I just don't see a reason to cater specifically to them, other than providing the information that they have the possibility to not be an idiot.
Thank you, me not saying what you said I did.
A version that's not leaked before a developer would release one... Pretty obvious from what I'd already written before.
Indeed... Alpha/Beta releases that are deemed to be functionally stable enough to release, even if they still have some objectively minor issues that can be either hotfixed or fixed for the next version.
According to my responses, but based on your interpretation of my responses... Since your interpretation of plain statements leaves a lot to be desired, I'll take your inference with a truck-load of salt.
I already wrote it as it was meant to be written. Re-read it, since my opinions suddenly matter to you again.
I did not say, or imply "catering" to anyone.
Ironically, you have implied that based upon what you've written.
You cater to a select minority, one whom you deem to be worthy of your efforts by virtue of them not saying anything negative about what you've leaked, because the only ones who would complain about what you leaked "can just be ignored because they will never have anything useful to add to any converstation".
Last edited:
No, you are twisting now the facts. I never said anything about releasing a test version. That was something you interpreted about my answers. I spoke about alpha and beta versions, which are pretty much anything a Dev releases on patreon before release 1.0.
So your answer was totally nonsense from my point of view, and just insulting/condescending. First with the "facepalm", going on about "good/bad pirates", talking about standards. Had nothing to with my statement that alpha and beta versions can be leaked with the provided information, so peopla can make informed desicions if they want to download it.
So from my point of view, you started the gaslighting, showing an above us attitude.
- Jul 12, 2020
- 9,985
- 23,101