The MEGA links for the Windows version and the Mac version seem to have been switched.
Unity Wizard School Exchange Student [v0.7 Hotfix] [Blue Witch Games]
- Thread starter bluewitchgames
- Start date
- Jun 15, 2017
- 1,999
- 2,004
If you can't afford artist, what stopping you from picking up a pencil and drawing yourself? Pretending ai is magically giving a creative outlet is a downright lie when there is no barrier of entry to begin with. Anyone can pick up a number 2 pencil and some scratch paper and put lines down.
No what people want ai to do is replace the artist, they want the artist end result without having to spend the money or put in the time to get that result. It's a crutch not some great creativity equalizer
- Mar 10, 2017
- 1,592
- 2,236
just putting pen to paper wont make you an artist with any level of skill and if you think that way, be my guest you either have raw talent or worked at it for years. Not something that happens overnight, and if your a coder, why not work with what you know?
AI art isn't exactly like asking it to draw huge fuggin anime tiddies and poof out comes what you want. It takes a lot of work and some went back to using daz because it was easier than teaching an AI to draw. So If you think AI is a crutch, it goes right up there with daz, SFM, HS, or any other computer based art form. Deep down its all code unless your the one making the skeletons and textures and no one making games is doing that part.
AI is just one more medium. Back in the day everyone bitched CGI would replace traditional art styles yet here we are with just one more tool in the toolbox.
- Mar 18, 2023
- 307
- 429
Was kind of beat to it but still feel I have to address it
I don't see how this in any way disagrees with what he said. Unless you are implying that the people trying to "replace the artist" do so from a place of malice, which is obviously not true. Yes, people want to "replace the artist" in the sense that it's a really useful tool that enables people to create the semblance of a finished product even if they have no interest in drawing as a creative outlet, or don't have the financial means to commission artists, or whatever x reason. Just like daz is a really useful tool that replaced the tasks of some 3dmodellers. Just like any other tool in the history of tools. Yes, of course I feel bad for artists that feel that their lifeworks have been (partially) replaced by new tools, but if I had to fight that fight for everyone else who have seen their work transformed by technology too, I'd be able to do very little in my life. If it's any comfort, I've spent half of the Patreon proceeds so far to commission things from artists, so at least something goes back. Besides, with the direction things are headed, I'm next on the chopping block. We're not very far from tools that will enable artists to generate games at will, which they will be able to populate with their art. I've a feeling that these will sell better than the current situation of the other way around (until we're all replaced and there are just consumers and the overlord class)
>No what people want ai to do is replace the artist
I don't see how this in any way disagrees with what he said. Unless you are implying that the people trying to "replace the artist" do so from a place of malice, which is obviously not true. Yes, people want to "replace the artist" in the sense that it's a really useful tool that enables people to create the semblance of a finished product even if they have no interest in drawing as a creative outlet, or don't have the financial means to commission artists, or whatever x reason. Just like daz is a really useful tool that replaced the tasks of some 3dmodellers. Just like any other tool in the history of tools. Yes, of course I feel bad for artists that feel that their lifeworks have been (partially) replaced by new tools, but if I had to fight that fight for everyone else who have seen their work transformed by technology too, I'd be able to do very little in my life. If it's any comfort, I've spent half of the Patreon proceeds so far to commission things from artists, so at least something goes back. Besides, with the direction things are headed, I'm next on the chopping block. We're not very far from tools that will enable artists to generate games at will, which they will be able to populate with their art. I've a feeling that these will sell better than the current situation of the other way around (until we're all replaced and there are just consumers and the overlord class)
Last edited:
- Mar 18, 2023
- 307
- 429
They are in the windows registry under defaultcompany (lol). You can create a copy of the key there
- Mar 18, 2023
- 307
- 429
I think the mac versions have been sort of hit and miss if they work or not in the previous version. Sadly don't have a machine to test them myself
Xài tiếng Anh đi hoặc google dịch trước khi post lên đây và đừng có chấm không ai quan tâm đâu. Ở đây là cộng đồng nước ngoài chứ không phải VN mà chấm.
This bro is from my country, and he is new and clearly don' read the rules so I just warning him using our language.
- Jun 13, 2022
- 169
- 219
Does this game actually require a minimum line on the CPU, RAM and graphics card?
My laptop not only seems to load the game infinitely, but can barely handle more than the background graphics at the beginning of the game.
only onboard grafic.
P.S.: Why is the full-screen mode not switchable to window or lower resolution?
BTW I like your avatar
@ bluewitchgames
My laptop not only seems to load the game infinitely, but can barely handle more than the background graphics at the beginning of the game.
only onboard grafic.
P.S.: Why is the full-screen mode not switchable to window or lower resolution?
BTW I like your avatar
@ bluewitchgames
- Jun 15, 2017
- 1,999
- 2,004
I dont remember saying it did, in fact I'm quite sure i said you want to avoid doing the actual work to become one.
Good thing i never said nor inferred that.
By all means go ahead, as long as you stick to using open source sampling pools and not just taking directly from google or worse directly from artist pages which majority if it does. And yes it does thus.
I know exactly what it does, ive toyed with and tested it myself.
And to get decent result it takes a lot of copyrighted works.
Irrelevant to literally anything i said.
False comparisons, daz/sfm/hs dont model for you, they dont rig it for you, they dont texture. And ontop of that THEY DONT complete and unfinished animation/scene/or model for you. You can put a sketch into dali etc it have it do everything for you, yes again ive done it before.
No thoufht of perspective, anatomy, and color theory was required so yes unlike the program you falsely compared them too you still require a human touch and knowledge. Yes ai is a crutch.
Digital painting which is what im assuming you are specifically referencing required an understanding of traditional skills, so again another false equivalency. Ai isnt just one more medium, medium is tool you used as the basis for the creation.
It's outright retarded to not use what tools you have that is convenient to you, if it so saves you time and effort. Much like how we rely on technologies to make things easier for ourselves. Should you stick with that silly ideology of yours, do not try to sick it on someone else; why don't you just toss out your PC and mobile devices and rely on primitive efforts for your life?
You understand that a lot of the technologies we use these days have essentially replaced the jobs/careers of many others (prior to the invention of something more convenient), and at the same time birthed many more different career opportunities that stemmed from said technologies as well. If something is so easily replicable by technology (or by other means), it is then naturally no longer necessary by the standards of our global growing society. In other words, you've become outdated and obsolete with that ego and thinking.
- Jun 15, 2017
- 1,999
- 2,004
Just a note, there is a apology or two to you in here.
And it doesnt stop with just art and you are right we are not the first. There are white collar jobs that got hit before us and we said nothing because we believe a machine could never do what we do. But it also wont stop with us. Why bother learning to code when an ai given its own code can code itself faster and more efficiently, or anyrhing of that matter.
But i guess this is how we reach that hreat filter.
Then you arent paying attention his literal first part of at he states that because one cant draw or pay for an artist there is some kind of barrier of entry to make a game. Which is already factually inaccurate, one of the biggest played games has some of the ugliest art ive ever seen... im looking at you minecraft. Hell this very site and rpg maker is a testiment to this.
i didnt apply mental or emotional intent for a reason.
Or dont want to spend funds on an individual to gain access to their skill set for various reasons. Nor have any care or concern for what actually goes into the creative process which is part of what makes the art, art.
I love this false equivalency, daz doesnt (or didnt when i was back learning it) 3-d model or sculpt. You cannot stig a unrigged, un uv mapped square in daz, type a few prompts and have a fully rendered, rigged, and textures scene. Daz is a scene and rendering program. The fact you think they are equivalent is baffling. If this was a argument of say me being against digital painting was some bla bla to art then yes that comparison would be accurate.
A tool doesnt steal to be a tool, ai is trained to be a replacement.
Stolen to train machines with little respect or concern or csre for the craft or the creator just the produc5 because that all those pretty pictures are to them, products, but continue.
Having your work transformed and having it taken then watered its value down even more are two different things.
No one asked you to do anything or even told you to stop. While i can and will admit a part of my statement did go into "ai generate pictures bad", ill never call it art, ill put down my pencil and throw away the decade of study and threw decades of drawing before i ever do that. My point was, ai isnt some.hreat magical barrier destroyer into creativity. There is no barrier of entry, well outside the ohvious needing a computer but even then we as children created games long before computers were a thing and claiming otherwise is a lie. So i will apologize to you, because i didnt intend to go into the whole ai art argument but im too use to it ar this point.
I nees no comfort as i was neither attacking, coming at, or calling you out for using ai. As i cannot and will not control someone else's pencil. I will not nor cannot tell you qhat you can or cant do or pay some kind of artist reparations. I again thag was not my attentionbut i did let it happen ao i apologize.
This is a romanticized idea in actuality it will destroy any growth or even interest in these crafts. Because you remove the incentive or will to improve. I find it intriguing how humans have this constant urge to remove growth and improvement from ourselve. Why would one borher learning a skill or trade when it can be done faster with less effort from a machine?
And it doesnt stop with just art and you are right we are not the first. There are white collar jobs that got hit before us and we said nothing because we believe a machine could never do what we do. But it also wont stop with us. Why bother learning to code when an ai given its own code can code itself faster and more efficiently, or anyrhing of that matter.
But i guess this is how we reach that hreat filter.
- Jun 15, 2017
- 1,999
- 2,004
Yep, all those retarded people who try to learn archery when a gun is more convient.
All those retarded people who still use paddle boats when a motor boat is more convient.
All us retarded traditionalist who still use oils, gauche, acrylics, and water colors when digital painting is more convient ans faster... we are all just retarded.
Half true, most people realy on technologies because it is all they have every and never knew anything different. Just like how majority of people only know, "food comes from the grocery store" and dont know a single thing about farming hunting, or forging. The grocery store is not jusg more convient its all they have ever been introduced too. Hell samething is true about technology, when i learned how to desifn websites, before we ever even opened up dream weaver, we had to learn how to build one using only notepad. Dream weaver was more convient, but it was pointless if you didnt actually understand what you were doing and aweing underneath the hood.
But hey, we have already seen that the world is filled with people willing to even give up their own freedom for a manicure of convience.
Didnt sick anything on anyone but please, continue with har har its better because easier... no wait, dont because out of respect for the op, i wont continue this here but feel free to dm me.
Dont ever remember saying beint against technology but please, dont let facts stop your logical fallacy.
Little to nothing to do with what i actually said, just some argument against what you imagine i said or think.
Is it just me or does the art seem AI-made?
Don't get me wrong, it's super good, but something about it seems AI-ish....
Don't get me wrong, it's super good, but something about it seems AI-ish....
these ai images are so much better than the shitty 3dcg