>Main focus of the game is obviously incest/harem
>complains that the incest can't be avoided
Well. It's hard to know how big the incest part is in a game until you have actually tried playing it. The dev's. are seldom very forthcoming with that kind of info. Beside that. I strongly doubt that anyone plays a game, just because it includes incest. A lot of other stuff has to be right too before someone sticks with a game and becomes a supporter of a game, but it only takes one wrong thing to prevent someone from becoming a supporter or ditch a game. At least I try the games before i sends them to the trash bin or become a supporter.
And for complaining. I don't see anyone complaining. I'm letting the dev. know why I won't be a supporter of his game. It's up to the dev to decide whether he believes that a change is worth the work or not. Ricoh is not the first dev. to reject a proposal from a potential donor, and he won't be the last. For me the rejections means less games to play. For the dev's. it means less money in the till.
And for the record. The proposal I've made only means different dialog. There are no new scenes etc. Just small differences in the dialog. Given Ricoh's latest statement about how incest can be "avoided" today, my proposal would probably mean less work than the current no incest path. Try think about that before you tag me as someone who is just here to complain.
That said. I did leave the thread when I said I would. I only came back because someone quoted my posts. So if you don't want to see me back. Don't quote my posts.