- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,320
Nothing you've said has remotely insulted me.Okay, mate. But don't be shy to remind me to not reply further to your post if I ever forget and reply to one in the future. You know, in case I could insult ya with another "passive agressive" comment of mine, clearly becasue of my own assumptions of your cleary so precise comments.
I simply pointed out the obvious mistake in your claim.
It's extremely basic maths. 2 layers of clothing is fully clothed. 1 is half of 2 & underwear only is 1/2 layers = half naked.
So she is half naked in the image, quite literally. Your original reply was baseless.
Meanwhile you've objected to a point which you introduced, yourself.
So effectively you're arguing with your own point = yourself.
The only person capable of being insulted by that, should be yourself.
Last edited: