- Jun 30, 2018
- 2,995
- 4,487
I'm in spooky dream and i found all scenes except robot girl, which things i need do? Which items i need? I cant find the way. (and yona of course, she is not implement that dream as far i know)
first post - look for the answers there.I'm in spooky dream and i found all scenes except robot girl, which things i need do? Which items i need? I cant find the way. (and yona of course, she is not implement that dream as far i know)
There is nothing about spooky event there?first post - look for the answers there.
There isn't an ending with the robot IIRC, just the four main girls. And yeah, I'm pretty sure the dream was either before Yona joined the house or only just after so she isn't in it.I'm in spooky dream and i found all scenes except robot girl, which things i need do? Which items i need? I cant find the way. (and yona of course, she is not implement that dream as far i know)
I don't know what you mean by "spooky event" and that is part of the problem. All of the events that you can unlock are in the gallery and have a name proper name when you mouse over them. I have a document (linked on the first post) which tells you how to unlock every one, and unlock all the pictures on the phone. Otherwise - follow the prompts on the phone for each girl, they are pretty good at telling you where and when to go.There is nothing about spooky event there?
I know, right? The brightness of the GUI is so high it can burn eyes out! We need a darkmode!holy fuck, this is hideous.
View attachment 1432986
The robot girl from the space dream is in the living room in the Halloween dream.I am also a bit confused. There is the Helloween event and it's been a time since I played it but I don't remember any robot girl, and there's the floating in space dream which has a robot girl but to me does not qualify as "spooky".
Funny, I just saw a half naked chick and didn't know what you all were talking about being so ugly.. lolI know, right? The brightness of the GUI is so high it can burn eyes out! We need a darkmode!
Where do you see a half-naked chick? Did she hide behind not very naked, wearing bra and panties, Naomi?Funny, I just saw a half naked chick and didn't know what you all were talking about being so ugly.. lol
Cheers
Well, Naomi is a pretty sizeable girl, much room to hide behind.Where do you see a half-naked chick? Did she hide behind not very naked, wearing bra and panties, Naomi?
Bra & panties is precisely half-naked.Where do you see a half-naked chick? Did she hide behind not very naked, wearing bra and panties, Naomi?
Have tried the two first. In Dominant Witches, the girls are just sluts. MC literally just have to be there in order to get the free sex any male character would have get for just being there. Whores disgusts me almost as much as grannys. But Desert Stalker, oh man, that game looks like something I can enjoy.You may want to try... Dominant Witches, Desert Stalker, Rainy Day, Casey's Fall, Pale Carnations, Karlsson's Gambit
These are not without a romantic path, but all offer less than sympathetic routes.
Woah, mate, take it easy! There is no need to take math into this!Bra & panties is precisely half-naked.
Fully clothed is 100% clothing.
Naked is 0% clothing.
Halfway point, in her underwear, 50% clothing, is half-naked.
You are actually quite right. Naomi is clearly more comfortable without clothes than with them.Woah, mate, take it easy! There is no need to take math into this!
But if you really want to do so, then you should do it properly! Because bra and panties surely doesn't cover 50% of her body, although with breasts and ass like that it might be even 35%.
While "half-naked" is just a figure of speech meaning "partialy clothed" without really defined proportions how much to cover, it doesn't fit with Naomi, as she is always trying to stay without clothes. Entering her room? Topless. Geting a cold one when talking a bath? No towel just walking naked almost through half of your house. Pool? Naked until convinced to wear bikini to not embarrass Cait. Hell, If not fo Waif and house temperature she would walk around naked almost all the time or half-clothed, which term fits better if you want to describe her, at least in my opinion.
Before questioning my maths, I suggest you read a bit more carefully. I did not say "50% of her body", I explicitly said "50% of her clothing".Woah, mate, take it easy! There is no need to take math into this!
But if you really want to do so, then you should do it properly! Because bra and panties surely doesn't cover 50% of her body, although with breasts and ass like that it might be even 35%.
I just google it, to be sure, but "half-naked" still means "partially clothes", "reveling a lot of one's body" or "topless/botomless".Before questioning my maths, I suggest you read a bit more carefully. I did not say "50% of her body", I explicitly said "50% of her clothing".
People generally wear 2 layers of garments: undergarments + over/outer garments = fully clothed.
So, if she's only wearing 1/2 garment layers, she's "half" naked/half dressed, denoted by direction of travel.
The rest of your description, for what she wears around the house, is unfortunately irrelevant.
He was not talking about what she wears in the pool, or the bathroom. Be a bit hard to wash if she's not naked in there!
He was specifically referring to the image & you questioned it, so I answered.
She is half naked in the image.
We see her fully clothed in the kitchen, the lounge & on the doorstep.
We see her fully naked in the bathroom.
We see her in her underwear, so "half naked", as he rightly said, in the image.
I'm not questioning your math here, mate. If you felt insulted, then I'm sorry, but how could I know you're sensitive about your math? I just felt like doing math joke, because there is no way underwear, in this case Naomi's panties and bra, could cover enough of her body to qualify as 50% clothing to your description.Bra & panties is precisely half-naked.
Fully clothed is 100% clothing.
Naked is 0% clothing.
Halfway point, in her underwear, 50% clothing, is half-naked.
I'm not "sensitive" about anything. You can leave that passive aggressive shit at the door, thanks.I'm not questioning your math here, mate. If you felt insulted, then I'm sorry, but how could I know you're sensitive about your math?
What you objected to, her not having 50% of her body covered, was not something that I said.There is no need to take math into this!
But if you really want to do so, then you should do it properly! Because bra and panties surely doesn't cover 50% of her body
Okay, mate. But don't be shy to remind me to not reply further to your post if I ever forget and reply to one in the future. You know, in case I could insult ya with another "passive agressive" comment of mine, clearly becasue of my own assumptions of your cleary so precise comments.I'm not "sensitive" about anything. You can leave that passive aggressive shit at the door, thanks.
You did question my maths, but to an incorrect premise.
So I advised you to "read a bit more carefully, before questioning my maths".
What you objected to, her not having 50% of her body covered, was not something that I said.
So your objection was to something that you introduced. Not something I said. You objected to your own point.
Why should I be sensitive about anything?
I specifically said she only had 50% of her clothing & in the image, she does. Hence "half" naked.
I've explained why the answer to your question, to the guy of "where do you see a half naked chick?" in the image, is Naomi.
There's really nothing more to be said on the subject.