Avaron1974
Me thinks you are taking the use of non-period language much too seriously. For example the phrase:
Modern English: Awesome wasn't used during the time of knights.
Elizabethan Translation: Most wondrous wasn't hath used during the timeth of knights
Middle English, used during the time period you mentioned gets even worse. Try reading Chaucer (considered the first author to write in English of any form) in it's original text. If you want to understand the story, you have to make allowances and just assume they are using whatever the equivalent in their language would be and you're hearing it through a universal translator.
Nobles in 1100 - 1300 would have spoken a form of archaic French, Frankish, or something similar anyway.
Me thinks you are taking the use of non-period language much too seriously. For example the phrase:
Modern English: Awesome wasn't used during the time of knights.
Elizabethan Translation: Most wondrous wasn't hath used during the timeth of knights
Middle English, used during the time period you mentioned gets even worse. Try reading Chaucer (considered the first author to write in English of any form) in it's original text. If you want to understand the story, you have to make allowances and just assume they are using whatever the equivalent in their language would be and you're hearing it through a universal translator.
Nobles in 1100 - 1300 would have spoken a form of archaic French, Frankish, or something similar anyway.