Oh, it is my partner that does the shitposts and he swelled up with pride when you said that. I usually provide the examples of thoughtful analysis although it usually represents both our points of view on the subject. We take very different approaches to the enjoyment of our mutual hobby.And here I thought you were only capable of shitposts.
Well said.
"To frame him". She has a boss, she can talk about whole situation. In this case, she has upper hand, she has authority. The whole "send him to prison" is such a bullshit case, really. Prison sentence for corporate secrets are extreme cases. Laura, as a leader of some department, should be well infromed about that, until stated otherwise. About your question. It's very vague and broad. We're discussing this particular case of Laura.
And that's why I think it's not a rape. Well, if you want, you can consider it as a duress to sexual actions. Sure. But. Rape suggests that a threatened person did not has a free will or was physically restrained. That case was neither of this. She could walk away any moment. And that's my claim/pretension. But for some reason you're trying to bleach her reputation like she's some kind of a martyr. Well, it seems that the author himself claims (by tags) that this is a case of a rape. Then, whatever. Luca is sure an evil for a sake of it, but then again, Laura is not an angel either.
It's just a conceptual question, no need to get yikesy and cringe about it. A community can decide that the word 'rape' is only to be used about physical coercion (which is historically consistent) but still take blackmail and similar situations seriously from a legal and ethical perspective. There's no factual answer to conceptual decisions like that, it's just a matter of how language is used.
So, in this specific case of Laura's first sexual interaction with Luca and not in relation with an abstract (and horrible) notion of rape - she wasn't actually cheating ? She was just doing a relationshipy social function ? Isn't that kinda blame shifting from the cheater's guidebook ( "it was only the tip", "it didn't mean much", "I was thinking about you the whole time", "he/she is just a friend", "I was feeling neglected", "I was feeling pressured"). I mean if it's rape of course cheating is excluded.
I don't think that the question is that binary whether it was cheating or rape. It is possible to be both. I will give an example of a friend I know whose wife was cheating on him, but there was a specific sex act that she begged her affair partner not to perform because of a health condition. She had recently had a child and there had been complications. I will not specify what he did to her because it was gross and terrible. Even though she did consent to sexual contact she did not consent to that sex act and the affair was discovered when she went to the hospital. Even she admitted readily that it was both cheating and rape. The affair partner was her boss, so he did have power over her, but she admitted that the rendevous itself was not coerced. And certainly, Laura does have fully consensual sex with Luca eventually, but consent is not a blanket for everything goes and even when she does consent to a specific act he regularly violates her consent for others. It is okay to be confused when it comes to these issues because a lot of them fall into gray areas that society really doesn't want to talk about. Also, it is okay to make a distinction between these sexual assaults and forcible rape where violence is used. That's why the legal system has different degrees of rape and sexual assault. Laura isn't in the right just because she was wronged. If Laura were to try to excuse her actions, for example, based on the fact that the sex was non-consensual until it wasn't I don't think a reasonable person would accept that when deciding whether or not to continue a relationship. Her actions demonstrate a lack of judgment and basic respect that makes her a deeply unsuitable partner. I don't think that anyone here is arguing that or if they do they must be taking the piss.
How is it a conceptual question ?
According to feminist like you all form of sex when women don't like something it's rape. Even when women, for exaple, voluntarily suck's boss dick for raise.
This is the best example of a strawman argument I've seen in a long time, and that's saying something.
Well, that's kinda another extreme.
I think we need a evolution of ntr games to get them on the next level
Yeah, too bad _that_ game died in 2021... isn't it? Quite a relief to still have developers like @HangoverCat who deliver constantly, even when coming at cost of a more "focussed"/contained/restricted project.
Yeah, I don't see the problem with this game... it's just a focused NTR game, if he tried to do as much as he's doing with multiple characters the game would be finished on 2026.
I mean I would rather have one very good focused game that is finised 2026 or 2028 than 3 small games in that time frame that are all big tits,black neighbour corrupts the gf too fast ,no relationship build up and unrealistic scenes dont understand me wrong I LOVE NTR I think this kink is hot as hell but I really hope some devs will evolve and get ntr on the next level like other devs with other genres do at the moment change is not always bad and I think the ntr genre is in need of some changes.
That is just one approach to NTR, not everyone inserts themselves.
Nah, no one wants a 5 years development game.
