Poser_Voyeur

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2020
1,223
3,584
you mention in this updates scene, a shota scene and given handjobs. what handjobs? she touched them and stroked a few times, that is not a handjob. unless like the jogging scene, you miss that because filthy stat isn't working right, like dylans stat.

also, it's not shota and people need to stop applying that it is, the boys are the same age as Dylan. this has been established plenty of times in this thread.
In which case why is L&P seemingly deliberately drawing them as if they are far younger?

I personally don't remember an in game reference to their ages but then I have not been focussing on that route.
If what you said is correct then it might make it less creepy if that was more apparent in game.

I personally would feel more comfortable if there was a slew of 18th birthdays in the coming updates so that any sexual acts would be less questioned.
 

paula789

Member
May 2, 2017
305
200
I was planning to support the dev on Patreon. But after seeing this update I've lost interest. I don't know why he took more than five months for this content. That's not worth the wait.
 

ashitanojoe

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2019
1,899
8,736
I am with GingerSweetGirl on this one and I found it creepy so I deleted my saves concerning the 2nd job
I think we should pronounce against that event and route. L&P spended a lot of time creating the 2nd job event just to see that creepy thing. The 2nd job is highly controversial, do you know if the patrons have expressed discontent about it?
 

nexer

Forum Fanatic
Feb 5, 2019
4,572
17,651
If it looks like a minor, if it talks like a minor, if it quacks like a minor, then it's a minor with the applicable tags attached. No amount of handwaving or age-splaining will change that as is AWAM is hosted on Patreon, which in turn is hosted in the US and accountable to US laws; Not Indian, not Pakistani, not Philippian, not Thai, but US laws.
You liked the scene with Julia and the ice cube. Here's what Julia looked like on day 1.
What do you think, she's a minor?
Day1_15_8_Julia_enters.jpg
 

momojean

Member
Sep 15, 2017
295
767
1600+ people still support the game.
You might have not liked the update but a lot of people did. Your opinion is more in the minority.
Most of us already felt that the pace has been accelerated a lot in this day and Should rather be calmed down a little.

And your solution for sex scenes does not make sense from the current standpoint in the story. Plus the sex scene won't appear for another 6 years minimum. So don't bother yourself with this game any further.
you don't think you should rest a little. You don't leave any comments that criticize the game or the dev without you responding.
who tells you that those who did not like the update are the minority. If you go back and do calculations you will find the opposite. Yes 1600+ supporters. But I bet that there are more than 2000 who are ready to support the game but who hesitate because of all the issues it's experiencing and because of the dev behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toushiro and Dnew

sonyback

Newbie
Aug 5, 2020
33
6
[QUOTE = "trinciapapere, post: 6000763, membro: 1857423"]
você pode tentar o jogo paralelo que um cara fez há algum tempo: aqui o jogo paralelo awam . agora alguém poderia plx responder minha pergunta anterior? o material L&P está sujeito à lei de direitos autorais?
[/CITAR]
thanks
 

Talcum Powder

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2018
1,420
4,880
We all know what's going on here . . . let's not gloss over the fact it's shota, modified to not be shota.
I've been all over the fence about the home schooling event but I can't rationalize a different conclusion: it's totally fucked up.

The pupils are portrayed as pre-pubescent children with regards to their understanding of human physiology, even their own. Not plausible. The dialogue can call them "teenagers", the artist can whip out the Kragle and affix some light pubic hair, the artist can flesh out their brow and jawline, amp up the muscle tone morphs, to make them look slightly older. None of that overcomes the fact that the personalities on display are clearly pre-pubescent.

Why is this? L&P wants to include child molestation in his game. Call it Shota, call it Melange, it doesn't matter. While there's a law firm's worth of plausible deniability to argue about, but the fact of the matter is there's no questioning the artist's intent or the result. We are watching Sophia molest children. This is intentional.

Why does L&P want child molesting in his game? I don't know. The answer to that isn't nearly as important to me as why it is being portrayed without malicious intent? Sophia worries about the teacher/student taboo, at one point (and I think only once) thinks to herself "... never mind that they are teenagers ...", and mentions societal boundaries (also once, I think), but the overwhelming hurdle in her mind is that they are her students - that's the taboo for her. Not age.

There's a lot of inner monologue humming and hawing about should I shouldn't I, but none of it is that they are too young for sexual contact.

Why is this? Either we're meant to buy into the "late teenagers" idea that's presented on the surface and it's just kinda creepy but not abhorrent, or, we're deliberately meant to overlook the "late teenagers" language and see them as children being molested by a completely well-intentioned adult.

I think it is deliberately the latter we are meant to take on board, and I think that makes the scene completely ugly and gross: "I did it for their benefit." That, is fucked up.
 
Last edited:

gilgamesh9

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2019
1,198
1,955
The Dylan argument is flawed and tbh wrong. First D + S have not had their dick wanked off. Second their avatar / model have changed and grown and there has been a time gap since through the days, third the kids look like 12 year olds, it was done on purpose. Fourth any storyline words is fucking meaningless because it would Lusty Patrons way of getting around Loli porn.

Regardless, no 16 (unless they are special needs) needs help understanding what puberty and masturbating is. It clearly designed for them to be around the age of 12 to 14. If you think other wise, then i am concerned.
See and that's the second time ive seen that said. Im not jarring at you btw just saw the post and it reminded me. If they really are special needs that's an even bigger NO NO and she should be arrested that would imply that don't know what's going on fully and she would be taking advantage of them (reverse rape as some would call it) but idk didn't get the scene.
 

sharpys

Active Member
May 21, 2017
691
1,750
You liked the scene with Julia and the ice cube. Here's what Julia looked like on day 1.
What do you think, she's a minor?
No I don't really care about the scene with Julia but don't stuff random words into my mouth like so many of you all do to L&P every time he talks. And yes, she's a minor by that picture. Or are you into 1000 year old lolis while we're on this topic?
 

hzjujk

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2020
1,679
6,837
We've had the discussion about the age of some of the protagonists before. And I already said back then who thinks Zac, Dylan and Sam are 18 years old is lying to themselves. And then some of the numbers were calculated nicely to calm their own conscience. People you think the 2nd part-time job is disgusting and want to cancel it. Then be honest and demand the deletion of the strory branches with Sam, Dylan, Zac and Julia.
 

Old Dog

Formerly 'Old Sea Dog'
Donor
Jul 20, 2017
15,410
93,874
I think we should pronounce against that event and route. L&P spended a lot of time creating the 2nd job event just to see that creepy thing. The 2nd job is highly controversial, do you know if the patrons have expressed discontent about it?
No the ones I have read enjoyed it
 
3.20 star(s) 466 Votes