tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,422
3,342
I assume you are referring to the current survey here.
Although you phrase it as vaguely as possible, you imply that L&P would/could manipulate the survey results in favor of his fetish. You write that nobody can prove anything, but I think you are smart enough to know that every (new) conspiracy theory starts with such formulations.
For some people here, all that will stick is - "L&P manipulates the survey results!".

And you immediately provide a pseudo-proof. Namely the statement from L&P, who I also know, that he finds this chain of events of the tutoring hot. I think after seven years of working on this game, pretty much every fetish wears off. And if he actually still finds the tutoring so super hot that he absolutely wants to share it with everyone in public, then he will do it regardless of any survey results - just as he has done so far.
And finally - the rule in this forum is that no one should be judged for their fetishes. Does this rule not apply to L&P?

Yours sincerely
hzjujk
Although it is not directly related to the above, I bring it up because of what you said.

Until now, I had not raised much of an issue with the discrepancy between the total number of votes and the total number of members. (Patreon)
This is because I believe that the previous vote was the total number of cumulative votes over several years. (Even now.)

But this time the process is different from before. (At least, how to make it public.)

So I want to ask.

013627.png
This is a screenshot from the 22nd.
The number of active members on this day was 2,005. (I checked now and the final number is 2008.)
However, the total number of votes revealed on this day was 2513.
Why did this difference occur?

another one.

I once said that a strange phenomenon occurred where Carl's vote count was -1.
During this voting process, a phenomenon occurred where Mr. Murray's vote count was -1. (20 days compared to 17 days)
How is this possible?

(I'm not trying to raise a conspiracy theory, I'm just saying that the issue of credibility needs to be addressed.)
 

Kilrun25

Newbie
Dec 27, 2022
25
30
Although it is not directly related to the above, I bring it up because of what you said.

Until now, I had not raised much of an issue with the discrepancy between the total number of votes and the total number of members. (Patreon)
This is because I believe that the previous vote was the total number of cumulative votes over several years. (Even now.)

But this time the process is different from before. (At least, how to make it public.)

So I want to ask.

View attachment 3770538
This is a screenshot from the 22nd.
The number of active members on this day was 2,005. (I checked now and the final number is 2008.)
However, the total number of votes revealed on this day was 2513.
Why did this difference occur?

another one.

I once said that a strange phenomenon occurred where Carl's vote count was -1.
During this voting process, a phenomenon occurred where Mr. Murray's vote count was -1. (20 days compared to 17 days)
How is this possible?

(I'm not trying to raise a conspiracy theory, I'm just saying that the issue of credibility needs to be addressed.)
Or perhaps, for example I voted for 3 different story lines so you might be missing the fact the 2500 votes could be the same person voting for multiple stories, so you have 2008 paid patrons, if you voted for 2 stories that would count as 2 votes, majority of people, most likely voted for 1 storyline (their favourite) whereas others like multiple
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,422
3,342
Or perhaps, for example I voted for 3 different story lines so you might be missing the fact the 2500 votes could be the same person voting for multiple stories, so you have 2008 paid patrons, if you voted for 2 stories that would count as 2 votes, majority of people, most likely voted for 1 storyline (their favourite) whereas others like multiple
I'll ask you.

What you are saying is that one person has the right to three votes. that's right?
What you are saying is that one person can cast 3 votes for one character. that's right?
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,425
18,389
I'll ask you.

What you are saying is that one person has the right to three votes. that's right?
What you are saying is that one person can cast 3 votes for one character. that's right?
He's saying that one member can cast more than one character vote. So a member can vote for Dylan, Ellie, Patricia, Sam, Zac, and Aiden in the same vote. But the member can't cast multiple votes for the same character, unless they have multiple member accounts.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,422
3,342
He's saying that one member can cast more than one character vote. So a member can vote for Dylan, Ellie, Patricia, Sam, Zac, and Aiden in the same vote. But the member can't cast multiple votes for the same character, unless they have multiple member accounts.
That was important to me.

I don't know if the voting has ended or is still in progress, but I noticed something unusual.

I'm watching some more.
 
Jan 16, 2024
29
253
why in the hell add stuff that does not further the main story is it pandering at this point to everyone's well almost everyone's Fetishes it seems he/she is pandering and adding stuff that should not be in the game to begin with i mean why add the side jobs and everything else when they do not further the MAIN STORY to begin with . its pandering and adding shit that don't belong to begin with take ______ and fill it in with whatever side crap that don't advance the main story and their you go . and at this point she/he is pandering/adding stuff for inclusivity is detarded and no need in it same as on tv/movies they do the same old crap you can have great/good movies/tv shows/games without having to have X Said Fetish/characters/sexuality/race/etc/etc you don't have to exclude people/things but at same time you dont have to include them either that don't mean that your doing it on purpose it just means they are not part of the story or you were not thinking of adding them or it did not occur to you at the time of the conception of said story . that is what makes great/good story not worrying about pleasing the masses in what they want or don't want. and if they like the end results fine if they don't then hey you tried you did your best and you know you did your best and keep trying til you get it right but at the end of the day it is upto the creator of said story to do with how they please regardless of what anyone thinks . i just hate how they add all the BS to a story for the sake of adding inclusivity without furthering the story if it is adding/furthering the story fine go ahead but do not waste my time with side BS that has nothing to do with said story its a distraction from main story
 
Last edited:
  • Red Heart
Reactions: onefingersalute

Bill_Buttlicker

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2018
1,120
3,414
Now if L&P had focused on these characters like he should have, he'd never need to even bring in the side jobs, museum kids, Liam cheating, pervert teacher, or swinging couple in the first place. By Sophia getting more involved in Dylan's soccer game she'd have more chances of interacting with the other players and their moms like with Zac and Alyssa. The set up she had with innocently seducing Zac and being introduced to Antonio by Alyssa could have played out in a lot of different ways with the other moms/sons but also kept each one just as sexual.
 

fapzoner69018

Newbie
Jul 1, 2023
68
92
353 + 127 lesbian path
So it's gonna be another 4 min of teasing with no animations and here I surprisingly had some hope on how it's already got up to 60% in less than a month since 0.201 but I was 'obviously' wrong. If L§P doesn't get any additional external support soon I would bet half of his supporters would unsubscribe from patreon and then he's going to regret it only when it's too late. I mean sure it will cost him a bunch to hire a professional artist but also this means more extra quality in shorter period of time which means more popularity and thus new income from new fans and if he actually commits to his previous idea of making a well-worked on erotic trailer on steam based on a structured and calculated plan this will tremendously boost the chance of getting a way much more extra cash which would encourage him to further improve the quality and add a lot of extra animations down the road and potentially taking this work to another level. But this is obviously just delusional speculations based on a shred of collective hope from his horny fans. And from the repetitive lying scenarios that we're seeing this will probably never happen. Such a disappointement that such a talented artist and writer like L£P never got a chance to show the real potential of AWAM. I can see he's afraid that this won't work and all his prescious 'bills' will go to waste or maybe just laziness corrupted his mind and made him think that this will continue as it already is without bearing any consequences whatsoever. I don't see any kind of dedication to any of the bold claims he has already established many times and made his audience blindly put all of their faith in him/her. I guess it's almost impossible to find a high quality game which is consistent with its updates and gives content in a short period of time.
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,425
18,389
:ROFLMAO:
Why then will the update be released in August?
Because he hasn't decided if he will add animations to this update or not and how many animations will be added. If he doesn't add animations, then it could be a July release if he continues to move at the pace he's currently going atm.

He is leaning towards no animations, although the status bar indicates there will be animations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ItsNotUs
3.20 star(s) 477 Votes