crabboid

Active Member
Sep 7, 2019
519
2,070
I'll explain it in short, he can't get his patreon unless he Removes and make it like DOL.
Incest, shota, brand names, school etc all against
For my own greedy purposes, I’m fine with gutting all of that. Sam and Zac pass for 18 at this point anyway.
 

Belaja smert

Member
Dec 28, 2017
160
69
And if he DOES that, he'll likely lose half the ones he has...
And if he DOES that, he'll likely lose half the ones he has...
But they do it there are always new entrepreneurs , they have killed many game makers output, my favorite game teacher pets . The only one I supported for a year, because it was overdrawn at the time. Nothing else came close. The only one who wanted sex in that game was the repulsive wife.
 

Bibifoc

Engaged Member
Apr 7, 2018
2,347
5,118
Here is the question: What unclear message did L&P receive from Patreon, and how was it interrupted? I haven't seen any correspondence between L&P and Patreon that said the link on F95 was the issue and he must remove it, no exceptions. If the information exists, would he share it to prove what is being said?

Many people here can only conclude that his Patreon page was banned for questionable content (Incest and Shota) based on the email that was presented, and with the "clean" version of DoL, it's only logical that AWAM was the game Patreon was speaking about in that email. So until other information becomes available to refute the current information presented, that is the only source of information people can go on. Everything else is conjecture.
Everything is conjecture when it comes to Patreon. They obviously talk about AWAM in the message uploaded.

The question is why AWAM is now a problem when it wasn't in last years. The previous review from Patreon was specifically about the F95 link. The link was removed, the page got back to business. The link came back, the page was banned. Make the math.

You can't expect that Patreon send a message "Hey there is a link between AWAM and your Patreon page, we're busted! We made a lot of money but we can't close our eyes any longer, we're going to have trouble. Sorry dude, nothing personal, see you. Kindly."
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,433
18,539
Everything is conjecture when it comes to Patreon. They obviously talk about AWAM in the message uploaded.

The question is why AWAM is now a problem when it wasn't in last years. The previous review from Patreon was specifically about the F95 link. The link was removed, the page got back to business. The link came back, the page was banned. Make the math.

You can't expect that Patreon send a message "Hey there is a link between AWAM and your Patreon page, we're busted! We made a lot of money but we can't close our eyes any longer, we're going to have trouble. Sorry dude, nothing personal, see you. Kindly."
It's Patreon rules, and they can change them at their discretion. The Patreon rules and ToS are designed to protect Patreon, not the end user. Every company in the US and contract are designed that way. Again, without looking at the email or message about the F95 link from Patreon, it boils down to how it was interpreted.

Each Patreon TOS personnel reviews the tasks differently. It is possible that the first set of eyes reviewing only looked at a couple of things and came to one conclusion, but the second set of eyes saw what was happening. So, they took the necessary action that was deemed appropriate. And since they decided to remove the page, they were only going to state the facts on their side of why they removed his page. They are not going to go into elaborate details because if they did that, they would open up a door that might jeopardize them in their actions to remove the page.

The problem some or most people don't understand is that Patreon looked at this as if it were being used as a shell or a front for AWAM by selling DoL, which is what ultimately got him. He took the risk of developing an uncensored version that violated Patreon's ToS by distributing questionable content. I'm sorry to say that, in the end, it wasn't the link. He should have adhered to Patreon because he didn't operate under the ToS policy. Remember, Patreon has this on file, too, L&P was reviewed for having AWAM on their platform with the same content several years ago, and they told him to remove it, which is why we got DoL.
 

Belaja smert

Member
Dec 28, 2017
160
69
It's Patreon rules, and they can change them at their discretion. The Patreon rules and ToS are designed to protect Patreon, not the end user. Every company in the US and contract are designed that way. Again, without looking at the email or message about the F95 link from Patreon, it boils down to how it was interpreted.

Each Patreon TOS personnel reviews the tasks differently. It is possible that the first set of eyes reviewing only looked at a couple of things and came to one conclusion, but the second set of eyes saw what was happening. So, they took the necessary action that was deemed appropriate. And since they decided to remove the page, they were only going to state the facts on their side of why they removed his page. They are not going to go into elaborate details because if they did that, they would open up a door that might jeopardize them in their actions to remove the page.

The problem some or most people don't understand is that Patreon looked at this as if it were being used as a shell or a front for AWAM by selling DoL, which is what ultimately got him. He took the risk of developing an uncensored version that violated Patreon's ToS by distributing questionable content. I'm sorry to say that, in the end, it wasn't the link. He should have adhered to Patreon because he didn't operate under the ToS policy. Remember, Patreon has this on file, too, L&P was reviewed for having AWAM on their platform with the same content several years ago, and they told him to remove it, which is why we got DoL.
So the laws of the United States? in many countries you can't marry a relative, but you can in the US. Most of all, then the strangest is the law about rapists, when you get married you can't blame. In Europe, it seems that in all countries you go to prison and for a long time.

Yhteisön todentama ‑kuvake
 

brichouse

Member
Oct 31, 2020
270
418
So the laws of the United States? in many countries you can't marry a relative, but you can in the US. Most of all, then the strangest is the law about rapists, when you get married you can't blame. In Europe, it seems that in all countries you go to prison and for a long time.

View attachment 3822767
You can't marry a relative in the U.S. generally, although some states (usually southern...) do have laws that allow it. Also, most - if not all - states have moved away from an exception for marital rape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doccop63

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,601
3,741
So the laws of the United States? in many countries you can't marry a relative, but you can in the US. Most of all, then the strangest is the law about rapists, when you get married you can't blame. In Europe, it seems that in all countries you go to prison and for a long time.

View attachment 3822767
083654.png
083852.png

10 years because it's weak.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Occurs in 0.2% of the total population.
Banned or regulated in 32 states.
In some states, only if they are physically unable to conceive a child.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,601
3,741
I was surprised when I translated this. In the US, marriage between first-degree relatives is prohibited in only 25 states?

Is America in the Middle Ages?

How is this possible?

Even in primitive tribal societies, inbreeding was avoided.
 

watermankaku

Member
Feb 6, 2021
408
402
He has now posted some more pictures on Twitter, trying to retain some customers. This shameless guy has long been accustomed to this scam. When he found that this website delayed his making money, he chose to report and complain. He has been cheating people from the beginning.
 
3.20 star(s) 485 Votes