Jun 12, 2018
369
2,043
  • Like
Reactions: Monocabra

holy_cat

Member
Dec 9, 2020
147
384
it does seem like it won't be nothing more than another lingerie show, we will be lucky if she even get naked, there is not going to be grope or handjob like we said before, and certainly no blowjob, fuck this dev
Lingerie show as a part of sex ed... this idea is simply stupid or Sophia has to be extremely stupid, doing this in front of 12 y.o. kids.

I do support all kinds of 'jobs' that should happen to Sophia (maybe except for sidejobs) but for the god's sake, why with underage boys?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alley_Cat

summersun

Newbie
May 5, 2017
69
208
Lingerie show as a part of sex ed... this idea is simply stupid or Sophia has to be extremely stupid, doing this in front of 12 y.o. kids.

I do support all kinds of 'jobs' that should happen to Sophia (maybe except for sidejobs) but for the god's sake, why with underage boys?
Then just don't play that part, it's that simple. It's only an option in the game, and if you don't like it or it gives you moral discomfort, play the other side job with the old gents.
 

holy_cat

Member
Dec 9, 2020
147
384
Then just don't play that part, it's that simple. It's only an option in the game, and if you don't like it or it gives you moral discomfort, play the other side job with the old gents.
Thanks for the suggestion. Old gents, you say. In fact, instead of any side job I would rather welcome some progress of the main story.

With regard to moral discomfort... What I feel is 'general discomfort' coming from the direction L&P and the game goes. But yes, I would prefer Sophia's corruption with the participation of the Morellos, the janitor or even the postman rather than with underage kids.
 

immassman

Member
Feb 1, 2023
237
408
Lingerie show as a part of sex ed... this idea is simply stupid or Sophia has to be extremely stupid, doing this in front of 12 y.o. kids.

I do support all kinds of 'jobs' that should happen to Sophia (maybe except for sidejobs) but for the god's sake, why with underage boys?
you are clearly dumb because you dont know fetish, or taboo, believe it or not, sex is more than physical, lots of psychology involved
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,561
3,642
you are clearly dumb because you dont know fetish, or taboo, believe it or not, sex is more than physical, lots of psychology involved
I feel uncomfortable every time I see some people defending his stupid writing to defend LP.

Do you really think that when educational institutions teach sex education to young children, they will do fetish, taboo, lingerie show, etc.?

Don't claim 'fiction' as 'truth'.
 
3.20 star(s) 483 Votes