- May 15, 2021
- 249
- 317
PotPlayer is your friend. Plays VR on your monitor just like a regular video, except you can use your mouse to look around. There are probably other players like this as well.
Collection Video anielSzal collection [2022-02-15] [anielSzal]
- Thread starter rf96
- Start date
- Jan 7, 2021
- 90
- 117
Your not kidding i just had to get a 16 tb enterprise drive, filled it with VR porn from a few Vr porn sites i ripped and came up 4 TB shy of space needed to clean off my other drives so going to need another one now lol
Why is it that when i go to download, my browser refuses because it says it contains a virus. Never heard of this on this type of file. Anyone know if this is true?
- Nov 25, 2018
- 292
- 272
- May 6, 2020
- 1,035
- 1,211
Ya, some people do. But, honestly I think it is a small amount of people. I am not spending allt hat money on VR gear for a few video's once in awhile.
These dev's and sites that do VR need to do non VR versions.
- Apr 27, 2020
- 4
- 16
The animation quality is amazing, in VR you naturally spend more time looking at your "partners" face so getting facial animations right in a CG animation is superb work.
But the VR implementation is sadly lacking. The resolution just isn't enough, 1440p in VR is a joke. 4K should be the starting point but preferably 6k or 7k. And maybe it's just a personal preference but it completely ruins the VR effect when someone's face gets too close to the camera, it makes you go cross-eyed and you just get this horrible double vision.
But the VR implementation is sadly lacking. The resolution just isn't enough, 1440p in VR is a joke. 4K should be the starting point but preferably 6k or 7k. And maybe it's just a personal preference but it completely ruins the VR effect when someone's face gets too close to the camera, it makes you go cross-eyed and you just get this horrible double vision.
VR porn is significantly better than flat video. It's like going from a five frame long 256x256 GIF on your cell phone to high res POV MP4 on a big screen TV. It's a big leap in experience. Whether it is 3D rendered stuff like this or stereoscopic recorded live performance (ex. wankzvr, etc).
You have to decide yourself it is worth the hardware cost. I would say probably not if you are strained financially.
Some older content did a bad job properly rendering videos, like screwing up the scale of the world so you feel like you are 2 feet tall or an ant. Or they jerk the camera around which causes motion sickness. Almost all content creators stopped doing this, again for renders live video recordings. Some very slow smooth camera movement can be good if used very carefully.
Anielszals actually does sort of "punch" or "knockback" the camera in some these videos, but its just small and quick enough to not cause motion sickness. I personally would still prefer it not be present, though.
Yes, video files need to be huge in filesize and resolution terms to not look blurry. You need a lot of disk space if you want to horde stuff. Content needs a lot of extra pixels, more than double because you not only have two eyes to feed but also a massive field of view. The video takes up your entire field of view with the goggles on, like putting your face inches away from large TV, so the blocky pixels of lower resolution stand out much more. 4k (3840x22160) is a good minimum but still won't look as clear as a 4K 2d picture. You also would need a newer headset like a Quest 2, Index, or Reverb G2 to make use of 5k+, as devices like the original Oculus not very high res for instance (like 1080x960 per eye?), but it still looks good and I'd say better than any 2D video because of the immersive experience of it. Maybe its bad if you have a fetish for skin blemishes or peach fuzz. Full 7k/8k with a newer headset looks amazing if you have all the right stuff. H.265 if your PC can decode it brings 7k/8k video file sizes down a lot without sacrificing quality, and most of the 7k/8k stuff now is h.265 and about the same size at 5k/6k h.264.
I think in general PC wise all you need is something like a 1660 or 1070 or so class card with 4GB+ of VRAM, maybe 6GB for high res stuff? It doesn't necessarily take a hyper-high power, you are just doing video decodes, not rendering polygons and such like you need for VAM. I don't know about Quest 2 streaming of PC videos, but there are options to do it over wifi if you have fast 5Ghz wifi. Air Link or Virtual Desktop, you'd have to look that up as I don't have a Quest 2.
VR porn game content is generally fairly lacking. VAM and Home Maid 3D are about it, and I don't generally care for anime. VAM has horrible, horrible performance even on an ultra high end PC. Everything else is dog shit. Just keep in mind if you invest the VR content world is much smaller than 2D. I.e. there are zero Ren'Py games for VR, and like 90% of the porn games on this site are ren'py games.
A lot of the rendered VR video "content" the short form loops are pretty boring just like all the 2D videos of the same sort of 3 second loops of shovelware IMO, but Anielszal's stuff is really next level. Like the Redmoa of VR. The detail and time put into facial animations and such is really good in VR. Even if its only ~20-30 seconds thats pretty good and far better than 2-3 second loops of garbage so many creators put out. I always think the longer form stuff is always better. Several minutes of actual animations, but only a tiny fraction of all content creators put that amount of effort in.
You have to decide yourself it is worth the hardware cost. I would say probably not if you are strained financially.
Some older content did a bad job properly rendering videos, like screwing up the scale of the world so you feel like you are 2 feet tall or an ant. Or they jerk the camera around which causes motion sickness. Almost all content creators stopped doing this, again for renders live video recordings. Some very slow smooth camera movement can be good if used very carefully.
Anielszals actually does sort of "punch" or "knockback" the camera in some these videos, but its just small and quick enough to not cause motion sickness. I personally would still prefer it not be present, though.
Yes, video files need to be huge in filesize and resolution terms to not look blurry. You need a lot of disk space if you want to horde stuff. Content needs a lot of extra pixels, more than double because you not only have two eyes to feed but also a massive field of view. The video takes up your entire field of view with the goggles on, like putting your face inches away from large TV, so the blocky pixels of lower resolution stand out much more. 4k (3840x22160) is a good minimum but still won't look as clear as a 4K 2d picture. You also would need a newer headset like a Quest 2, Index, or Reverb G2 to make use of 5k+, as devices like the original Oculus not very high res for instance (like 1080x960 per eye?), but it still looks good and I'd say better than any 2D video because of the immersive experience of it. Maybe its bad if you have a fetish for skin blemishes or peach fuzz. Full 7k/8k with a newer headset looks amazing if you have all the right stuff. H.265 if your PC can decode it brings 7k/8k video file sizes down a lot without sacrificing quality, and most of the 7k/8k stuff now is h.265 and about the same size at 5k/6k h.264.
I think in general PC wise all you need is something like a 1660 or 1070 or so class card with 4GB+ of VRAM, maybe 6GB for high res stuff? It doesn't necessarily take a hyper-high power, you are just doing video decodes, not rendering polygons and such like you need for VAM. I don't know about Quest 2 streaming of PC videos, but there are options to do it over wifi if you have fast 5Ghz wifi. Air Link or Virtual Desktop, you'd have to look that up as I don't have a Quest 2.
VR porn game content is generally fairly lacking. VAM and Home Maid 3D are about it, and I don't generally care for anime. VAM has horrible, horrible performance even on an ultra high end PC. Everything else is dog shit. Just keep in mind if you invest the VR content world is much smaller than 2D. I.e. there are zero Ren'Py games for VR, and like 90% of the porn games on this site are ren'py games.
A lot of the rendered VR video "content" the short form loops are pretty boring just like all the 2D videos of the same sort of 3 second loops of shovelware IMO, but Anielszal's stuff is really next level. Like the Redmoa of VR. The detail and time put into facial animations and such is really good in VR. Even if its only ~20-30 seconds thats pretty good and far better than 2-3 second loops of garbage so many creators put out. I always think the longer form stuff is always better. Several minutes of actual animations, but only a tiny fraction of all content creators put that amount of effort in.
You need a VR Gear get it working on your pc and that does not cost just a bit of money.
But image i have the money and said and done i upgraded my PC and bought a decent VR gear, well the problem is now that VR googles aren't made for peoples wearing glasses so my 8k video turns into a 480p.
So i either pay probalby more and get a vr gear that is wearable with glasses or i go over the pain and squeeze some contact lenses right into my eyes.
and all that work just for a FEW videos that im actually interessted in...
don't get me wrong, let VR users have their fun and go ahead and experience with that stuff but i think you always should make a NON-VR version, specialy if you are one of the few that puts out decent animations with a acceptable length.
Otherwise you are just one of the these decent VR stuff creators, some peoples just can't enjoy. (not speaking of porn itself)
But image i have the money and said and done i upgraded my PC and bought a decent VR gear, well the problem is now that VR googles aren't made for peoples wearing glasses so my 8k video turns into a 480p.
So i either pay probalby more and get a vr gear that is wearable with glasses or i go over the pain and squeeze some contact lenses right into my eyes.
and all that work just for a FEW videos that im actually interessted in...
don't get me wrong, let VR users have their fun and go ahead and experience with that stuff but i think you always should make a NON-VR version, specialy if you are one of the few that puts out decent animations with a acceptable length.
Otherwise you are just one of the these decent VR stuff creators, some peoples just can't enjoy. (not speaking of porn itself)
It's hard to go back once you've seen a few wankzvr videos.
If someone in real life gets that close, do you go cross eyed trying to keep focus on them as they are inches from your face?
No, of course not.
Just relax a bit. Don't try to cross your eyes so hard. You'll find it is way more immersive.
- Nov 25, 2018
- 292
- 272
You must be registered to see the links
- Jan 18, 2021
- 1,474
- 6,302
Here's the torrent that compile files from OP (Right Click > Download):
- May 8, 2017
- 965
- 3,608