redoubt27
Well-Known Member
- Mar 6, 2024
- 1,000
- 1,628
- 229
Even among royals, full siblings getting married/having sex was not exactly "commonplace", ie ordinary or the norm.I think that successive generations, especially since the tech explosion of home computers and the internet in general, have gotten so inured with connectedness that they don't realize just how commonplace it was to happen, even within the last century. I'm over 50 now, and I remember seeing an interview when I was in early 30s range. The couple were from an Italian village (near mountains? I dunno, it was something remote) and they were brother and sister. It didn't seem to trouble them a bit, and when they were asked why, it was simply "Well, there really wasn't anyone else around either of us liked".
The royal histories are littered with intentional inbreeding, largely due to religious influences and 'divine bloodlines'. You don't taint the ruling class with trash, etc.
It's far easier to find somebody out there that you're not related to, but it'll still happen on occasion just due to the high preference for similar traits in a mate, whether it be physical or personality quirks, many of which wind up being inherited.
Occurred more than many think, sure. But it was still the exception, not the norm.
I also think a lot of those were half-siblings...
There may be exceptions with a few ancient cultures, but again, it was generally not the norm.
Sibling marriage, or sexual relationships, has been taboo for centuries, even as far back as ancient Rome. It is not a new or a recent development.
And there is some science behind siblings, or even non-related children, who grow up together developing a natural sexual aversion to one another...