Yeah I agree, this is the wrong place for this kind of debate... particularly since it is such a gray subject with both sides being firmly fixed in speculation.I only pointed out Dahmer as an example to say that a blanket "nobody" statement, which seemed to me to be what was implied in the first place, is false. The effect of content on people varies greatly from person to person. I also very specifically said I was not talking about anyone in particular on this site. I have been referring to a very tiny group of people in the world who actually have mental disorders in the vein of things like psychopathy and sociopathy. I have no idea where anyone is getting the idea that I said dark content causes a mental illness. In fact, I said specifically that it does not cause that. (Jeffry Dahmer even says exactly that: claims like "pornography caused it" are only excuses.) What I stated was that it could act as a trigger, potentially influencing someone who already has a mental illness of that type to act on an existing weakness.
I chose the word trigger very intentionally, and the content absolutely can be a trigger. Just like some people have a genetic weakness to become an alcoholic or similar, so some people with dark thoughts can be more predisposed toward psychological influence through content they consume. I also don't believe the content creates a mental disorder, but it absolutely exacerbates it if it already exists.
Anyway, I wasn't saying the dark content shouldn't exist or that anyone who enjoys that is bad in some way. I didn't mean to cause a big off-topic tangent on the thread. I'm obviously not going to change your minds, and you're not going to change mine. So, agree to disagree, I suppose.
Last edited: