instaMagix

Member
Dec 1, 2020
153
460
Good God this game is all over the place,feels like there's no plot at all,it's all swinging,sharing cuckold.there's no cheating.
the first version is better,and i just want an anal scene with claire with other guys and look what i found?a jelly like fuckdoll with no bones,jesus dev can you just make a normal anal scene position,because wtf is this? :WaitWhat:
wtf.jpg
 

shobhie

Newbie
Sep 1, 2020
71
35
```
I'm sorry, but errors were detected in your script. Please correct the
errors listed below, and try again.


File "game/script.rpy", line 119: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene black with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 175: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene black with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1236: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1238: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9_2 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1240: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1242: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9_2 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1244: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1246: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r5_6_7_8_9_3 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1263: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene r14 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1838: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_11 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1843: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_14 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1845: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_17 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1847: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_15 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1862: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_16 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1864: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_18 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1866: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_19 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1872: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_20 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1879: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_21 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1889: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_22 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1928: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_31 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1938: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_32 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1940: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_33 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1942: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_34 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1944: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_35 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1946: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_36 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1951: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_37 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1978: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_38 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1980: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_39 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1985: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_40 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 1987: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_41 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2071: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_58 with hpunch:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2074: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_59 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2077: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_60 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2087: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_65 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2089: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene salk_66 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 2829: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene m12 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4360: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_42 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4383: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_42 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4387: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_42 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4393: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_43 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4423: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_47 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4427: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_48 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4429: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_47 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4431: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_49 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4470: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_50 with hpunch:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4472: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_51 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4475: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_53 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4478: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_53 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4481: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_54 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4483: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_56 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4487: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene rm_58 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4490: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene roseclean1 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 4492: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene roseclean2 with dissolve:
^

File "game/script.rpy", line 5103: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene black with trans3:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2up2freeroam/ep2up2day1home_night.rpy", line 1073: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene sgu_35 with flashln:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2update2.rpy", line 825: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene crm_104 with flashln:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2update2.rpy", line 3114: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene tb167 with flashln:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2update2.rpy", line 3189: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene tbx1 with flashln:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2update2.rpy", line 3481: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene msc19 with flashln:
^

File "game/script/ep2/ep2update2/ep2update2.rpy", line 3520: scene statement expects a non-empty block.
scene msc19 with flashln:
^

Ren'Py Version: Ren'Py 8.3.3.24111502
Sun May 18 18:29:26 2025
```

I am getting this error message after I unzipped the game and installed the walkthrough/multi-mod. Can someone help me?
Thank you
Yeah i think it's just a mod problem. I removed the mods and launched the game and its working fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulgariAMARA
Mar 29, 2023
352
424
```
I'm sorry, but errors were detected in your script. Please correct the
errors listed below, and try again.

I am getting this error message after I unzipped the game and installed the walkthrough/multi-mod. Can someone help me?
Thank you
Dude, ever heard of
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Or maybe even if you put it like this, would be fine
 

Rayne

Newbie
Aug 2, 2017
59
373
o wait there is some new content for the love path cool that's good to know I just assumed id need to skip that save until the love path gets another update
Apparently we'll have to wait a long time because according to the author, the next update will be ntr part 3 again, and this is together with the statement that he wants to finish the game this year and he already has plans for a new one. At the same time, I honestly don't understand the defenders of such developers who shout that just wait for the update you need. In my opinion, if the developer really cares about their audience, then the updates usually alternate, but here there will already be the 3rd update of the ntr path.
 

Adhdclassic

Forum Fanatic
Mar 10, 2024
4,087
6,143
Good God this game is all over the place,feels like there's no plot at all,it's all swinging,sharing cuckold.there's no cheating.
the first version is better,and i just want an anal scene with claire with other guys and look what i found?a jelly like fuckdoll with no bones,jesus dev can you just make a normal anal scene position,because wtf is this? :WaitWhat:
View attachment 4851134
Think this is the start of the cheating. Especially after the conversation and reactions in the living room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSC82

Ozygator

Engaged Member
Donor
Oct 15, 2016
2,645
4,632
Apparently we'll have to wait a long time because according to the author, the next update will be ntr part 3 again, and this is together with the statement that he wants to finish the game this year and he already has plans for a new one. At the same time, I honestly don't understand the defenders of such developers who shout that just wait for the update you need. In my opinion, if the developer really cares about their audience, then the updates usually alternate, but here there will already be the 3rd update of the ntr path.
Apparently, according to the change notes, the NTR path we can assume is Claire's 'true' path.

Again, assuming how the changelog is written, this is what the dev plans to work on. By logical extension, anyone not interested in what the dev *really wants* in the game may as well just leave now.

This second version appears focused almost exclusively toward a single audience, which is not a problem, as long as the dev realizes anyone not in that audience will probably vanish like smoke. Which is the rightful consequence of how the dev has worked on this game the last half dozen releases.
 

juveforever

Newbie
May 1, 2025
29
72
Apparently, according to the change notes, the NTR path we can assume is Claire's 'true' path.

Again, assuming how the changelog is written, this is what the dev plans to work on. By logical extension, anyone not interested in what the dev *really wants* in the game may as well just leave now.

This second version appears focused almost exclusively toward a single audience, which is not a problem, as long as the dev realizes anyone not in that audience will probably vanish like smoke. Which is the rightful consequence of how the dev has worked on this game the last half dozen releases.






then the developer can play it without any worries, and his arrogance also takes away the public, his way of doing things has already cost him the expulsion from the Steam store, perhaps, he should be more humble, but as they say, it's his game, he should play it, hahahahahha, and the game is absolute shit even for those who love NTR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cavpal

only MILF

Forum Fanatic
Dec 30, 2020
4,806
5,596
Good God this game is all over the place,feels like there's no plot at all,it's all swinging,sharing cuckold.there's no cheating.
the first version is better,and i just want an anal scene with claire with other guys and look what i found?a jelly like fuckdoll with no bones,jesus dev can you just make a normal anal scene position,because wtf is this? :WaitWhat:
View attachment 4851134
OtAN.gif ...POOR GIRL... :cry: :cry: :cry:
 

Ozygator

Engaged Member
Donor
Oct 15, 2016
2,645
4,632
Although not sure what type of each. The swinging with Paul and Marie stands well in a NTR playthrough, but doesn't stand in NTS unless that path is going to gradually drive John into a willing cuckold role. It's a pity because the same scene could have been written differently, with almost no additional/exchanged renders, to continue a true sharing/swinging route if John had shown enthusiasm in both watching Claire and fucking Marie. He showed neither, and in the end he's crushed. If you divide the last update into 4 parts (Paul's "invitation" to John, John and Claire's conversation and decision, the main event and the post-main event conversation), you notice a pervasive tone throughout: Paul manipulates John, he's hesitant but can't bring himself not to immediately bring Paul's invitation to either Claire or Zoey (you don't have a choice other than whom to pick) without giving it some thought. Pretty much being led by Paul. The connection you could feel between Claire and Paul in the earlier parts of the game is gone, they no longer communicate and that's hugely disappointing, I think it was a good part of what made the game stand out until now. Claire insinuates that she has specific expectations regarding Paul that John can't fulfil, and you feel that once the idea is on the table, John no longer has any say in it, there are no further checks if it's ok to proceed, the whole episode seems reckless from a relationship point and driven solely by Claire and Paul. They don't discuss boundaries or anything a "normal" couple would be expected to discuss leading up to their first swinging experience. During the scene, there is zero connection between Claire and John, Paul completely steals the show, not even Marie is excited as she pity-fucks John. John does cum twice - both times rather quickly like a good cuck - and doesn't make Marie cum, while in another room, Paul makes Claire squirt and nearly pass out. Conversation after is awkward, Marie tells John not to overthink it. Claire and John's going home is even more awkward and neither wants to talk about it before sleep. Again, the contrast with the previous updates. It seems like the game took a 180º turn towards hard NTR.



It was, but a failed swing. Swing is supposed to be wanted by all parts involved, approached with some maturity and care, and involve lots of communication - there was none of that. This was Claire and John not just going out of their comfort zone, but recklessly doing so. What was most striking was the contrast with the previous updates, where you had all the ingredients to let Claire and John approach this with much more maturity.



It's disappointing because it seems like there's a strict Love vs NTR gap forming, with no nuance in the middle, and some old and spent power dynamics tropes. If you like a route with sharing between equals, this isn't going to be it - but it was clearly suggested in the previous update, with long and detailed conversations between Claire and John about opening up to new experiences. This last update seems like a sudden break of continuity (bad writing) or a cynical statement that good intentions are bound to die in the face of reality - a valid argument, but bland and overly explored.
You could see the NTR coming though, even when John and Claire were talking about her exploring things with her sister, and then Claire and Zoey basically say they are going to cheat behind John's back, even if the player says they are in favor of the two 'checking things out', which sgould open a poly route but it doesn't.

This game started mediocre with decent characters but a decided slant to NTR, and then the dev re-did it, supposedly to balance things out, and now we're heading straight back to hard NTR again. Seems like the original game the dev release was more of what they really wanted, they re-wrote/re-launched to try to get more supporters outside that fetish but are now basically pushing stuff hard back that way again.

This is a classic example of bait-n-switch by a dev, which is unfortunate because the rewrite *could* have easily truly went in a more open/poly swinging route but deliberately choosing not to.

I gave this one a mulligan based on the initial re-do, but forcing things bask to how it launched originally and away from the potential of the relaunch tosses it back on the trash bin.
 

Ozygator

Engaged Member
Donor
Oct 15, 2016
2,645
4,632
then the developer can play it without any worries, and his arrogance also takes away the public, his way of doing things has already cost him the expulsion from the Steam store, perhaps, he should be more humble, but as they say, it's his game, he should play it, hahahahahha, and the game is absolute shit even for those who love NTR.
Yeah, the hard core NTR fans we can assume will come back with the last, this one, and next update. Apparently the dev is grasping for straws to get some sort of support since they can't decide what to do with their story, so do a half-assed job at all of it, just enough to piss off the fans of all the genre's they are trying to appeal to.
 

Joshy92

Message Maven
Mar 25, 2021
12,755
29,822
You could see the NTR coming though, even when John and Claire were talking about her exploring things with her sister, and then Claire and Zoey basically say they are going to cheat behind John's back, even if the player says they are in favor of the two 'checking things out', which sgould open a poly route but it doesn't.

This game started mediocre with decent characters but a decided slant to NTR, and then the dev re-did it, supposedly to balance things out, and now we're heading straight back to hard NTR again. Seems like the original game the dev release was more of what they really wanted, they re-wrote/re-launched to try to get more supporters outside that fetish but are now basically pushing stuff hard back that way again.

This is a classic example of bait-n-switch by a dev, which is unfortunate because the rewrite *could* have easily truly went in a more open/poly swinging route but deliberately choosing not to.

I gave this one a mulligan based on the initial re-do, but forcing things bask to how it launched originally and away from the potential of the relaunch tosses it back on the trash bin.
The Typist promised me that NTR could be avoided, and we could focus on NTS when I asked him last year, so hopefully it stays that way.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: wommerrx and Cavpal

Dealbreaker

Member
May 12, 2024
487
605
People are really mad. According to their self-insert logic they shouldn't be mad about the dev but about the character herself, Claire. They should act out their feelings within the game if they aren't willing or capable to take it as a work of fiction.
 
3.30 star(s) 106 Votes