I really thought more of you and you disappoint me.
You leaned too far out the window and fell. Examples: MC profile picture or that seasons 1-2 and 3 should be separate, etc. And now you grab the last thing you have left. Discrediting.
You are replying to a post by "Sun of Rome", who completely understands that the theories should include the entire game and are replying to his post in which you discredit me.
Do you notice the difference between the two of us? I'm not jealous when someone else comes up with a theory or makes a good catch. I even praise such people because they don't stubbornly think in just one direction. Another difference between us is so I can admit when I know I was wrong. Not you, no, you discredit.
These are your words
"Even the dark AL was more than straightforward, why do you perceive BADIK differently? BADIK is larger and extensive on all levels - primary, secondary and background characters, more developed and multiply storylines and choices."
Prove to me (you winner) so that with a few consistent theories you can correctly break down everything that happened up to EP10 and then also your conclusions about what might happen in the future EPs. Come on, prove it to me so that I don't find any errors in these theories. It should be possible to prove sentences like the ones you wrote here, because otherwise the sentences have no value.
What you don't notice so that there aren't so many different theories from me. With each new EP, I get new information and adapt my theories to this new information. You just don't notice the differences (just like in the game) and think it's a new theory.
For example, my twin theory is so old. I haven't written about it in a long time, I've even downgraded it from a theory to a possibility, and promptly DPC in EP9 provides a hint, not proof, that the possibility still exists.
The theory that I didn't want to write recently isn't a new theory either. I had it a long time ago and posted it too. I don't know if her thread is still there, it could be that I deleted it. But it became more and more explicit from EP to EP. I didn't post them purely out of respect for DPC's game.
It's good so you notice some things that can't fit into my theory. I have nothing against that because it is useful for theory development. But you're desperately looking for it and that's not good. Just as I rethink some things, which is what you advised me to do, you do the same, only in the opposite way. It's not good for me and it's not good for you either because it causes us to lose our way.
You were probably annoyed by this so that I could tell you to take the human psyche and empathy into account. My intention was not to upset or offend you. It was direct and good-natured advice. That seems to have pissed you off. But that would have made you realize that it couldn't be the MC's profile picture, which we know. The MC's reaction revealed everything you needed to know. He could only be surprised by an old profile picture of himself, which he hasn't used as a profile picture for a long time. You play the same game and you should have noticed that DPC includes gestures, facial expressions, feelings and reactions in the images and texts. Each character gets their own personality. That's why my advice was well-intentioned.
Well, now I've calmed down again.
I think you're mostly right about the rest.
