someone who genuinely like her ? No, there is none. Not Buying itI can show you one who loves Madame Rose.Better make it show me two.
You should've said "two people who like Madame Rose"![]()
No. I really wanna see Crusader of Romance clutching at the straws pointing out that "Buttlicker" here is one that's very fond of Madame, and try to illustrate his point by showing me posts that he's made about her.I can show you one who loves Madame Rose.Better make it show me two.
I never said that they voted between the girls and that patreons voted for Madame Rose over any other girl. He asked if they wanted a new MILF character for kinkier sex content, they said yes. I have read some claim it was originally a request from one of the highest patreons but I don't know if that's true.Show Me, show me the poll of where Madame would been voted for over literally any other girl in the game, especially if they are also Pink Rose girls like Lily and Nicole
There, use the Kemono, show ME ! ! !
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 4392735
What does Madame Rose have to do with it? She's is just sex scenes without story. Literally took 1-4 days to render. But unless you want Yoga Girl to be the same, only sex scenes without story, it takes more.What would be the problem with that exactly? Show me five to twenty people from this thread, the Discord, subreddit or wherever else most of this game's fanbase hangs out on the internet who like yoga girl. Then, show me just one person from said communities that likes Madame Rose. Excluding DPC of course, to avoid falling in the hole that I just dug myself.
View attachment 4392752
Hey it was still a minute apart, that's pretty good. Be proud
I never said she was popular here. I definitely don't like her myself (but she's more popular on Patreon). I'm just saying that removing her wouldn't do much since her content takes so little time to make. Some seem to be under the impression that removing her would have a huge effect on the development time when she's literally a couple of hours of posing and 1-4 days of rendering.No. I really wanna see Crusader of Romance clutching at the straws pointing out that "Buttlicker" here is one that's very fond of Madame, and try to illustrate his point by showing me posts that he's made about her.
One day, there'll be a poll of 'Who's your favorite side girl?' with Madame Rose as an available choice. Then the trolls will vote for her as it's not a poll that directly influences the kind of content DPC will develop for the game. Crusader of Romance will be bragging here to us that day when 0.8% of voters happen to be Madame fans.someone who genuinely like her ? No, there is none. Not Buying it
Someone who use her as to Troll, that "Hell Yeah Madam Rose " , Yeah there are some probably![]()
A lot sacrificed for a cow like that.Literally took 1-4 days to render.
I don't particularly want it to be the same for her. I asked you what the problem would be with development taking more time if this time; the time that DPC devoted to developing the game did actually mean better quality. Madame is an example of where that was not the case, took it 1-4 days or not.But unless you want Yoga Girl to be the same, only sex scenes without story, it takes more.
You always omit the fact that the whole season 1 took him fewer months to develop, despite having to build everything from zero and having more static renderings (fewer animations), with fewer and much less powerful GPUs.The render quality has not improved that much, most improvements are strictly related to his better hardware. He has not changed style, mastered posing or lighting since ep 1.So the size of the episodes and higher quality renders doesn't count? The fact that one episode is now as big as the whole first season? You expect an episode the size of the whole season to take the time of one episode in season 1?
It seem to me most people are not that passionate about all the extras like most minigames, his own songs, "cinematic" animations, excessive free roams and so on.Cutting content is the only way but nobody seems to want that. They want it all, just a shorter development time.
It's not really paths or sex scenes that complicate things. I remember you that first season had 29 lewd scenes, ep 11 will have 18. So he already cutted sex scenes a lot compared to the past. Writing for the various paths it's not that long or difficult to code, free roams instead are much more complex than standard linear story. Mini games are also more complicated to code and debug. A simple anal scene cannot take 35 days to write and render, unless you count animations or he had to redone animations a few times.Adding paths for the side girls really screwed up the development time but it's too late to do anything about it now. Maybe if he keeps Nora's path as over and close some other paths he could save some time. But most likely he won't. He started them and now he has to see them through and finish them.
And then we have the more elaborate sex scenes, like did Sage really need that anal sex scene in Episode 9 that took 35 days to make? And the Maya & Josy BDSM scene for Episode 11 proberbly took some time to make and feel out of place, was it really necessary?
But the patreons ask for these things and they pay him so he listens to them.
So you really have nothing to back it up your claims , how convenient.I never said that they voted between the girls and that patreons voted for Madame Rose over any other girl. He asked if they wanted a new MILF character for kinkier sex content, they said yes. I have read some claim it was originally a request from one of the highest patreons but I don't know if that's true.
And Kemono doesn't work for me, for some reason. Not sure if it would even come up. He seems to have deleted a lot of older polls. Like the Quinn & Riona threesome that patreons voted for. The info post is there but I can't find any of the polls, unless they are hidden.
It's no problem for me at all. I'm willing to wait. But for the people constantly complaining about how long the development is and how DPC should cut stuff so he can release earlier, it would. Some give examples with girls they don't like themselves (Nora came up a couple of times), I was using Yoga girl as an example that it's not as easy if it's a girl you want content with.I don't particularly want it to be the same for her. I asked you what the problem would be with development taking more time if this time; the time that DPC devoted to developing the game did actually mean better quality. Madame is an example of where that was not the case, took it 1-4 days or not.
He should stop adding more characters, because some folks eventually will want content with them, which further slow the development time, which confirm that he doing it on purpose to drag things out even more.One day, there'll be a poll of 'Who's your favorite side girl?' with Madame Rose as an available choice. Then the trolls will vote for her as it's not a poll that directly influences the kind of content DPC will develop for the game. Crusader of Romance will be bragging here to us that day when 0.8% of voters happen to be Madame fans.
A lot sacrificed for a cow like that.
I don't particularly want it to be the same for her. I asked you what the problem would be with development taking more time if this time; the time that DPC devoted to developing the game did actually mean better quality. Madame is an example of where that was not the case, took it 1-4 days or not.
You say the whole Madame Rose took from one to four days including rendering. But a few minutes before you said the anal part of Sage sex scene took 35 days.I never said she was popular here. I definitely don't like her myself (but she's more popular on Patreon). I'm just saying that removing her wouldn't do much since her content takes so little time to make. Some seem to be under the impression that removing her would have a huge effect on the development time when she's literally a couple of hours of posing and 1-4 days of rendering.
Hold the door! We got one more character, and then we can stop adding more girls and lewds for side girlsHe should stop adding more characters, because some folks eventually will want content with them, which further slow the development time, which confirm that he doing it on purpose to drag things out even more.
so yeah , conclusion, he is Milking.
Oh it was a long Day
View attachment 4392866
![]()
I don't know. It would have been better, if instead of Madame, and cutting out the 2 whortless ending and time to render those scenes. The one where MC end up the bed with 3 girls an nothing happens, or when he go to sleep on a couch.Hold the door! We got one more character, and then we can stop adding more girls and lewds for side girls
View attachment 4392899
I want more than just casual sex, but I'm willing to set my expectations lower for the momentI don't know. It would have been better, if instead of Madame, and cutting out the 2 whortless ending and time to render those scenes. The one where MC end up the bed with 3 girls an nothing happens, or when he go to sleep on a couch.
MC hooks up, with this random Girl, for casual Sex , and then run in to her in Chemistry class, and on Yoga class. Then Yeah maybe. But she also too late to the Party the quota is already full![]()