- Oct 24, 2018
- 5,551
- 10,285
- Thread starter N7
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating combat creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination female protagonist footjob graphic violence groping group sex handjob humiliation humor interracial lesbian male protagonist management masturbation milf multiple protagonist oral sex point & click prostitution puzzle romance sandbox sex toys spanking strategy stripping teasing titfuck turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Sep 17, 2019
- 312
- 2,454
How can you lose respect for someone for changing a story you don't know about yet? That's a conundrum now, isn't it?
- Jun 16, 2017
- 1,225
- 1,331
I have always somewhat agreed with the opposite of this. If I'm giving you money then I want to see the game and things I'm interested in. The whole false advertising thing comes to mind. If Im giving you money to support a game/fetishes and you start a new game or change the fetishes then thats bullshit. Its not about control but if the developer significantly changes his output of whatever then it serves him right for getting not so constructive criticism and a loss of $/patrons.
- May 30, 2020
- 557
- 794
- Jul 23, 2020
- 54
- 58
Yep it's just a fragment of their imagination.
- Jul 23, 2020
- 54
- 58
- Dec 13, 2018
- 7,748
- 19,532
I think DPC was always going to deal with that in some way, because even without the reaction some people had, it's still a big thing that needed clearing up and clarifying. The one thing that did seem like a slight retcon though, was when the mini-flashback of the MC leaving the library showed M&J weren't kissing, even though we know they were.
Ep 4
Ep 5
People were a bit pissed by that, so maybe that was an attempt to re-write history.
I did say "if we find out", in other words, if it came from DPC directly or a credible source that spoke with him that a certain change was made due to "feedback", and that resulted in a negative change for a character or plot point that was otherwise not going to be something negative, then I would lose respect.
Obviously, we may never know if DPC will do this, but I wouldn't like it if they did.
But should a dev change the direction of their story or what they have planned for a certain character because it's what you as a supporter want? That is the question here, about whether a dev should stick to their plans or give in to supporters requests/demands and change aspects of their story.
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,367
- 13,963
In an ideal world, the author should listen to as much (constructive) criticism as he (or she, of course) can get, but he should only act on that criticism when it demonstrates that he has failed to convey his intended message to large portions of the audience.
For example, I think your criticism of forking the Maya/Josy sex scenes in Episode 5 is perfectly valid, but whether DPC should act on it comes down to what he intended when he wrote the two scenes that way. If he wanted to emphasize how hard it will be to balance a three-way relationship by proving you can't always be there for both of them, then he should probably disregard your concerns, at least for now.
If, on the other hand, he wanted to make sure each player got a lewd scene with their favorite girl but was worried about M/J burnout so he made sure people didn't have to sit through both of them, then I think he should take your criticism to heart. Clearly, in trying to avoid one problem, he inadvertently created another one that might be just as bad. He should devise a new strategy to avoid burnout the next time this sort of thing comes up.
It goes without saying that this is easier said than done, but I think it's ultimately the only meaningful answer. Authors who insist on riding roughshod over their audience's wishes will eventually find themselves alone. But at the same time, trying to please EVERYONE will devolve into artwork by committee. Authors need feedback to learn how their art is interpreted, but at the end of the day that art has to originate in their own vision. They can certainly get valuable input from friends or colleagues, but they can't just farm the whole project out to the public.
- Jun 29, 2020
- 454
- 1,619
- Jun 8, 2018
- 166
- 411
- Oct 24, 2018
- 5,551
- 10,285
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,367
- 13,963
Great. Now I'm going to spend at least the next day think of the penis as "Organ X." Thanks a lot!
- Jul 23, 2020
- 54
- 58
- Dec 20, 2019
- 1,213
- 1,262
I believe the idea with Cathy here comes down to one word, "leather"
As much as I don't condone fans demanding from dev, I would have to disagree regarding your take on crowdfunding. Crowdfunding is more towards once off pledge in support of a project while what we have with patreon should be subscription. Supporters subscribe on a monthly basis and expect a return. The catch here is the expectations. Some of the fans (paid or otherwise) have an unforgiving and maybe unrealistic expectation from the devs. Fans should sign up knowing what they are getting into rather than demanding the devs to meet their terms.
Dev should stick to his/her story board unless a huge flaw is detected. Supporters requests/demands can only come in the form of freebies that doesn't/have minimal effect on the story.
- Apr 3, 2020
- 1,311
- 1,842
Is this a spoiler or just meme? Because Im waiting for next update to play chapter 5..
- Oct 24, 2018
- 5,551
- 10,285
- Jul 7, 2017
- 542
- 2,224
meme, it was pointed out we’ve never actually seen what Jill’s got down there. Shes never been completely nude. Futa jokes ensued.
- Jul 23, 2020
- 54
- 58
How Many time we tell you guys that JILL IS NOT A FUTA. Here's proof
You must be registered to see the links
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Maybe but the Derek line sticks out to me because its the exact phrase I saw many people use to describe how the scene in episode 4 came off. I never noticed that render though, interesting.
- Dec 20, 2019
- 1,213
- 1,262
Proves nothing, you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there.
It's a running joke in case you didn't realize.