Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut –70% OFF
x

FalconLover420

Engaged Member
Nov 23, 2020
2,777
3,218
419
:unsure: Why would you list me alongside Darkwen like that, when he is wrong and I am right :unsure::unsure::unsure:
Besides, according to this guy I am wrong, because he cites his own "research" as to why Bella < Nora (the supposed superior version of the milfy teacher). So proud and firm in his belief, it's even in his signature.
Damn I should have used Macky as the other example then :D

Because both of you are wrong and Tara is superb :giggle: (Im kidding, I love all girls except for madam rose, sandy, becky and zoey(but that is all DPC's fault on how he wants to create drama).)


We all have our likes and dislikes I love Josy, Spock Bella, Karamba and his "almighty Quinn" and Geralt likes Sage and Zoey point is we got a girl we like for our reason and it ok to give those reasons but I think we all would say that don't make someone wrong for not liking the same girl or for liking someone else

There can't be a true criteria for best girl we all like different things it all subjective sometimes opinions overlap but that still just opinion
EXACTLY^
 
Last edited:

SEXATRON ULTRA

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2019
1,090
1,560
370
I know this was yesterday but I kind of dig Sally so I'll say a few words. Yes, she's bitchy but I do tend to like a bitchy girl as long as she's not mean. Attraction wise I think this was the first time I really noticed her...

View attachment 4822159

To each his own but a petite little blond with an ass like that sets the hook right away.

Now her personality is the real twist. It seems to me, especially with her difficulties in the lab work and how she was at the Christmas party I think she uses her hostility as a defense mechanism. First, she's not as smart as her glasses might indicated. Second I think she's always had a thing for the MC but she doesn't want anyone, especially him, to know so she won't get rejected. Sure that could all be just fiction I made up but that's how it comes across to me in the flow.

Plus it's a challenge and her last line at the Christmas party after the little make out session was kind of soft and flirty. Sign me up :)

View attachment 4822164 View attachment 4822178
Is your name Daniel? lolololol :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 

Better Cock Spock

Half Vulcan, Half Simp
Donor
Jul 29, 2017
13,190
35,950
1,054
For absolutely no good reason and with nothing to back it up, I firmly believe the couple we see during Jade's leed in Episode 4 are Quinn's foster parents, Henry and Lynda.
anim_jade_doggy9_ep4-ezgif.com-optimize.gif ep4_jade_lewd83c.jpg
Maybe it's just the idea that Sage and Quinn unknowingly grew up right across from each other, and her dad has a front row seat to watching Sage's mom get dicked :HideThePain: Oh and also Quinn is her original name but it was changed to Priscilla to help distance her from her terrible past. No I don't actually believe any of this lmao
 

grarg

Member
Dec 16, 2020
361
496
215
I think subjective opinion is subjective opinion especially concerning like or tastes.

For example, there may be a BAD player out there who likes Becky, wants more Becky content and believes Becky is best girl.
However, for me? Becky is at the bottom of the list due to every criteria.

Let me give you another example, we have Darkwen who obviously has Josy as their number one and when asked, he will tell you why. In comparison, you have Better Cock Spock who says Bella is best girl in his eyes and will tell you why. Both opinions are valid cause its their tastes.

TLDR: Basically what I am trying to say is that trying to establish and official guideline on top girls like if they are weapons in an MMO is not viable when the community has different individual metrics
Oh I get what you're saying. Darkwen is biased. That's obvious. BCS likes x or y, etc. They definitely have their criteria. But preferences or subjective tastes are largely irrelevant. If they added all these criteria up, and you can see their bias, and lack of data. Think of it logically, like an RPG character sheet.

We consciously or subconsciously create a criteria in our heads. We say "best girl" for starters, then try comparing them to other girls, based on what we like, aware of this criteria or not. For example, people could just like Sage because she's a red head, nice to look at, or we enjoy her scenes more than others.

If we go metric by metric. Let's say something easy, like breast size (so larger = better), we can make a simple list of Bella, Nora, Madame in #1, and then Sage, Tara, Jill, Kylie, in Tier #2, etc. But wait, Sage was best girl, right?

Then we take another, let's say personality. We give it equal weight, so 50% breast size, 50% personality. Now, you might not like Quinn's personality, so she might be lower on the list. But that's subjective and preferential. Personality is based on their role in the story, and how well it's expressed, or characterized. So someone like Bella has emotional problems, is an "ice queen" or what not, so we take off points for that. One argument becomes "a well developed character has flaws". But we're not taking that into the context of a plot or arc, where those things are essential. "Does the personality fit the character"? Does the role or function of the character in the story befit their character? Quinn is an antagonist, so yes, it seems to fit, but the story isn't allowing us to explore that much. Bella is supportive, so that seems to fit. Both have their emotional hangups, and are not fully realized, so they're not completely idealized or actualized yet; their stories are ongoing. So they must lose points. (Of course, that score can go up or down as they finish their arc, and how well realized it was.) So personality would be something like Sage, Jill, Maya in Tier #1, Quinn, Bella in Tier #2, etc.

We then add these 2 metrics, divide by their number and get the average, and make a new tier list. And we keep going.

Thus, large criteria is important as it makes things more accurate. Reasoning behind the scenes, or the details of scenes, where characterization and plot relevance, are key. This is why Josy, despite having plenty of content, and scenes showcasing her character, is so low to the point of "WTF is going on DPC?" (Her character shifts for no discernible reason, and so drastically for her to suddenly go inside herself and do ...blogging.)
 

grarg

Member
Dec 16, 2020
361
496
215
He doesn't understand the concept of subjective reality. I mean no shade... who knows everything but that's why I exited the conversation. Not that he's going to listen but I did find this neat little package of info.

View attachment 4823836
I've studied aesthetics. Check out Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for this comparison.
 

MiltonPowers

Twins Basil! Twins!
Donor
Jr. Uploader
Jul 26, 2023
18,798
49,547
922
Oh I get what you're saying. Darkwen is biased. That's obvious. BCS likes x or y, etc. They definitely have their criteria. But preferences or subjective tastes are largely irrelevant. If they added all these criteria up, and you can see their bias, and lack of data. Think of it logically, like an RPG character sheet.

We consciously or subconsciously create a criteria in our heads. We say "best girl" for starters, then try comparing them to other girls, based on what we like, aware of this criteria or not. For example, people could just like Sage because she's a red head, nice to look at, or we enjoy her scenes more than others.

If we go metric by metric. Let's say something easy, like breast size (so larger = better), we can make a simple list of Bella, Nora, Madame in #1, and then Sage, Tara, Jill, Kylie, in Tier #2, etc. But wait, Sage was best girl, right?

Then we take another, let's say personality. We give it equal weight, so 50% breast size, 50% personality. Now, you might not like Quinn's personality, so she might be lower on the list. But that's subjective and preferential. Personality is based on their role in the story, and how well it's expressed, or characterized. So someone like Bella has emotional problems, is an "ice queen" or what not, so we take off points for that. One argument becomes "a well developed character has flaws". But we're not taking that into the context of a plot or arc, where those things are essential. "Does the personality fit the character"? Does the role or function of the character in the story befit their character? Quinn is an antagonist, so yes, it seems to fit, but the story isn't allowing us to explore that much. Bella is supportive, so that seems to fit. Both have their emotional hangups, and are not fully realized, so they're not completely idealized or actualized yet; their stories are ongoing. So they must lose points. (Of course, that score can go up or down as they finish their arc, and how well realized it was.) So personality would be something like Sage, Jill, Maya in Tier #1, Quinn, Bella in Tier #2, etc.

We then add these 2 metrics, divide by their number and get the average, and make a new tier list. And we keep going.

Thus, large criteria is important as it makes things more accurate. Reasoning behind the scenes, or the details of scenes, where characterization and plot relevance, are key. This is why Josy, despite having plenty of content, and scenes showcasing her character, is so low to the point of "WTF is going on DPC?" (Her character shifts for no discernible reason, and so drastically for her to suddenly go inside herself and do ...blogging.)
That's a lot of words to say "My way of ranking girls is the best and only real way."

I'm not sure if you're just trolling or unable to grasp what other people are saying.

No one is saying your criteria or way of ranking girls is wrong. But it is YOUR way, not other people's and it is not better or worse than anyone else's.

But it's still subjective. No matter how many big words you use it is still subjective.

If you are ranking breast size - that is objective.
If you are ranking breast size making largest better - that is subjective.
If you are ranking best boobs - that is subjective.
If you are deciding what weighting is given to breast size in overall determination - that is subjective.
If you are deciding Josy MUST lose points for being a blogger - that is subjective.
If you are deciding who is tier #1 for personality - that is subjective.
You decided breasts/personality was 50% each - that is subjective - Some people might have 80/20 or 20/80.
 

DIKHammer

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2024
1,089
1,977
221
For absolutely no good reason and with nothing to back it up, I firmly believe the couple we see during Jade's leed in Episode 4 are Quinn's foster parents, Henry and Lynda.
View attachment 4824110 View attachment 4824108
Maybe it's just the idea that Sage and Quinn unknowingly grew up right across from each other, and her dad has a front row seat to watching Sage's mom get dicked :HideThePain: Oh and also Quinn is her original name but it was changed to Priscilla to help distance her from her terrible past. No I don't actually believe any of this lmao
IDK that looks like it would be Linda's mom
 

Better Cock Spock

Half Vulcan, Half Simp
Donor
Jul 29, 2017
13,190
35,950
1,054
That's a lot of words to say "My way of ranking girls is the best and only real way."

I'm not sure if you're just trolling or unable to grasp what other people are saying.

No one is saying your criteria or way of ranking girls is wrong. But it is YOUR way, not other people's and it is not better or worse than anyone else's.

But it's still subjective. No matter how many big words you use it is still subjective.

If you are ranking breast size - that is objective.
If you are ranking breast size making largest better - that is subjective.
If you are ranking best boobs - that is subjective.
If you are deciding what weighting is given to breast size in overall determination - that is subjective.
If you are deciding Josy MUST lose points for being a blogger - that is subjective.
If you are deciding who is tier #1 for personality - that is subjective.
You decided breasts/personality was 50% each - that is subjective - Some people might have 80/20 or 20/80.
You're too good for this world, Milton :giggle:
 

Craysser

Active Member
Apr 28, 2022
664
741
216
Then there's no point to tier lists. Or evaluations. It's ridiculous. You either have a criteria or you don't.

We either have standards for quality or we don't.
literally only reason tier lists exist is because they are all subjective. Some like redheads more than blondes, ofc sage will be over maya for them. Some like tough and badass girls over damsel in distress, no surprise quinn will be higher than jill. Subjectivity is what makes a tier list. otherwise its announcement or something equally stupid.
"You either have criteria or you dont" no shit sherlock, criteria is how much do people like the characters, and liking is completely subjective.
You wanna make a list that is not subjective, make tier list based on character's height or age. then there is no subjectivity. Then there is only one tier list, only one posibility.
As long we talk about enjoyability, quality, likeness... then every tierlist is unique and equally as valid as the last one.

Just be honest with yourself and admit you desperately want to alter reality and create your own bubble where noone will judge you for wanting to stick your dick inside that filthy STD lair known as becky.
Dont pretend how you are trying to be "objective" and make stupid criteria only to then make list that dont follow said criteria.
"josy is D tier because her content leads to nothing"
meanwhile becky is B tier and she has no content... you dont have to make it objective but at least make it make sense. this is pathetic.
"using combination of sexual content, plot relevance, characterization, personality..." meanwhile C tier is bunch of nobodies with no sexual content and barely any screentime... whole tier above Zoey who does not only get full episode for herself, is not only her own character but also heavily shaped who MC is, and unlike bunch of C tier nobodies actually have sexual content and lot of screen time. Same with Riona, Plenty of sexual content, Layered personality, Very relevant for the plot around MC and in the background (seriously, CHICK MC does not even realize how much is happening in the B&R while Riona is in the thick of it), lot of screen time, MC can take her on a date... and she is just like zoey and josy bellow bunch of nobodies. Just say you like blondes and stop being an ass pretending its objectivity and giving some fake criteria you dont even know how to follow.
You literally said in one of your comments how important it is for you to see what Jill deal is, what made her into who she is, That is why she is so high on your "objective tier list"... and you put Lana, the major, some would even say the main, the key factor that shaped jill into who she is... in "Eh?" tier list...

No, he started at the end of the summer, so late August/early September. Where'd you get February from? :unsure:
weird, i dont know why i think he joind near the start of the year
 
Last edited:
4.70 star(s) 1,728 Votes