- Oct 14, 2018
- 559
- 854
Not accusing the dev of anything, but often it's out of financial motives. Fans of certain more nieche fetishes are ready to pay lots of money to get their fix."NTR"
View attachment 1882300
But why ?
Why not just finish the game with the route it's been on for a long time now and then make a new game after with NTR in it, if that's what you've decided you want to do next ?
Yet willing to bet there's more people who would honestly drop a game when they change characters just to add content like that.Not accusing the dev of anything, but often it's out of financial motives. Fans of certain more nieche fetishes are ready to pay lots of money to get their fix.
It wouldn't be the first time, honestly.Not accusing the dev of anything, but often it's out of financial motives. Fans of certain more nieche fetishes are ready to pay lots of money to get their fix.
At the moment it's optional, but unavoidable even if you choose to avoid it, because the opt-out doesn't work.The NTR content is optional or avoidable? Is for academic reasons... Seriously it is!!!
And unless I'm mistaken no one has mentioned any content that would have taken place in that scenario if the opt-out had worked so I'm guessing the option to opt-out is likely to be the thing that gets removed. So yeah!!! unavoidable NTRAt the moment it's optional, but unavoidable even if you choose to avoid it, because the opt-out doesn't work.
And the old vanilla subs pull out because now the game just became NTR and they don't want to support anymore. It just change who want to support you but total number stay the same or lower if 5 new NTR lovers support the game but 10 old vanilla lovers pull out.Not accusing the dev of anything, but often it's out of financial motives. Fans of certain more nieche fetishes are ready to pay lots of money to get their fix.
agreed even if some people support the new the idea it not worth it if you lose your long time supporter.And the old vanilla subs pull out because now the game just became NTR and they don't want to support anymore. It just change who want to support you but total number stay the same or lower if 5 new NTR lovers support the game but 10 old vanilla lovers pull out.
And repeat customer exist. If they like you. They will buy your product even if it not that good. If you piss them off they won't come back even your next product are better.
VNDB has an elegant tag system. Their system has tags for the game and for each character in the game (provided the community added the character). You could scan the tags and see the tag "That is actually wrong though, because NTR != cheating.
Also it isn't vague, but broad, people just confuse the two.
NTR (Netorare) literally means "To be taken from.", which accounts for many different contexts, situations etc.
And by literally, I mean literally, that is what the word means, and what it is used for.
A woman can be doing it, an orc, it can be consensual, non-consensual etc. (hell technically other tags can fit that definition too... but because those other tags already have tags lets ignore it).
NTR where LI is doing it consenually is cheating, when they are being raped it is not cheating, but both are NTR.
So a lot of cases where people say "it isn't NTR." it usually is because well.. the term broad as fuck, like the maximum level of relationship you need in NTR from the person being NTR'd (I say it like this, since NTR is the default tag used when there is no MC being followed), is for them to simply like the LI... they don't have to be dating, they don't have to have a certain level of relationship, hell the LI may not even need to know they exist, that character just has to have an interest.
It is why you have childhood friend NTR doujins in abundance.
So yeah you can't go much more specific than "Romantic interest involved with someone other than the MC." because then you start excluding forms of NTR when you do. e.g. add "without MC permission"? then you exclude Netorase which is a form of NTR (not to be confused with suggestion NTR stands for Netorase, it doesn't Netorase is just a sub-genre of Netorare, where MC is into being NTR'd).
Some extras:
Netori: "To take." (common misconception is that NTR stands for Netori as well.... it doesn't Netori is just Netori. And f95 uses cheating tag for this one btw).
Reverse-NTR: Where MC is the one being stolen. (f95 also uses cheating tag for this one)
Common misconception: that these terms are synonymous with cheating, they aren't. you can have a game be purely one of these tags without a single instance of cheating. (And yes F95 should probably stop using cheating tag for the above two, but there is no other tag to be used, so usually uploaders or devs just list it in genre instead).
Thank you for having a brain that works. This is a BREEDING GAME, and they have worked as BREEDERS on the farm long before "we" came along. They should absolutely be boning the monsters.For my part, I really fucking hate NTR. I'm not going to go on a moral crusade against it, demanding it never exist, but for some people it is... emotionally disturbing. Being cheated on isn't pleasant. And for the "Why are you associating yourself with the cuck, bro?" crowd, "If she'll cheat with you, she'll cheat on you." The idea that your dick is so great it'll make her a slave to it over all others? Well, that can be your fantasy.
But in this game, I'm not even especially bothered by what's being termed as NTR in this case. It's barely appropriate to apply the term because the whole game is about everyone being sluts, the MC likely being the former ruler of a legendary nation of sluts, your job is to be a slut, Rika's former job involved her being a slut... this isn't exactly a new context being introduced. My issues with her quest is that it's discordant with the rest of the game thematically. For a start, the MC shouldn't have a problem with Rika wanting to get fucked by monsters, but for some reason he does. The player is given a choice about asking Rika to remain monogamous when I don't see why that'd be a consideration in the setting, but it's given so the player rolls with it... and it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter either way. If we say we want her to be exclusive, she goes out and fucks monsters anyway. If we say she doesn't have to be, she lies to you about doing so and acts like it's something to hide, and then the MC gets upset anyway. This drama is both unnecessary and unavoidable, and none of it should exist in the first place. There are other ways to reach all the same plot points.
First option, if necessary - Rika sharing content. Yes or no, if no, you don't see any of it. I personally don't think this choice even fits with the setting, but whatever.
Assuming sharing is accepted, second option - Rika's sexual frustration. She can be enjoying sex with you and potentially being a partner in the breeding pit, but you get the sense that she's not quite as... mellow as you might want. Then you chance upon her getting dicked by a wild wolfman at night, and she confesses that the size and thrill just scratches that itch she can't otherwise be rid of. No drama from the MC, she's a little embarrassed at being caught and nervous the MC will consider it a slight, but there's not any reason to. The MC is a chill character in every other scene. But, MC does want to personally fix this problem for Rika, so the transformation questline. I personally think it'd be more interesting to have this be something greater than just a straightforward lycanthropy thing, which is a bit dull IMO.
Same plot points, same scenes, same art, no drama. It's all about the framing of what happens. The entire questline involves massive tonal and thematic shifts from the rest of the established game, and then on top of that the player is misled by the offered choices in both potential ways. None of this was necessary.
You would be amazed at the way i play breeding games where i meticulously design so that the only breeder is the male protag mc and other than mc the female npcs will only be boning other females.This is a BREEDING GAME, and they have worked as BREEDERS on the farm long before "we" came along. They should absolutely be boning the monsters.
Exactly, play the game you want to play, but don't bitch at others for how they do (or at the dev).You would be amazed at the way i play breeding games where i meticulously design so that the only breeder is the male protag mc and other than mc the female npcs will only be boning other females.
The point here is not that i want those content erased from the game. It's the importance of player agency. Let me play the game the way i want to play it, let others play the way they want to play it, which in the abandoned breeding season game and this game's previous versions was something that is still possible to do but now become unavoidable because of that one poorly executed questline.
Most importantly tho, the dev has already confirmed that they're addressing this writing discrepancy issue so i really don't understand what's the next couple of pages with wall of texts arguing about, just sit back and wait (for indefinite amount of time, as they're focusing on their other beloved game first) for the next update guys