- Apr 8, 2020
- 1,768
- 2,072
I just wanted to comment on this cause I mostly agree with the premisse, sadly we don't have a tag for relationship types but we could have open-relationships or polyamory and those would be realistic ways to make a "harem" by the definitions of this site.So far, you have a well grounded, internally consistent story that makes sense within the universe. I would urge you not to ruin it with copious porn logic. It's damn near impossible to write a realistic harem (Why are all these women a-OK not only with just the MC, but also sharing him with many others, in this world of free-flowing sexuality? Why would they devalue themselves like that?). In 99% of harem games (if not 100%) all choices boil down to "do you want to have sex with this character? yes/no". That means there are no stakes, no threats, no consequences. Good guy kills all the bad guys and gets all the girls. That's just... boring, really.
quick explanation that will probably get me some facepalms from some specific people:
Open-Relationship; it is a broad term but from my own understanding it would be having a pyshical and emotional relationship with one person and having an agreement to be able to be pyshical with others (for all involved)
Polyamory; Has many types but again from my definition it would be people being able to have multiple fullfyling relationships, physical and emotional or just one of those, and having an agreament about it, it can have hierachy or not(I prefeer the "not") and have many shapes or forms but the gist is that everyone involved would be able to persue multple relationships if they wished(my sig has a link to a question on the polyamory sub-reddit if anyone is curious)
So I think one of those would be more realistic(because they actually happen in real life) than most harems around.