She's waiting...ready to tease you live - Jerkmate is free! Join Now!
x

Bob XP

Formerly 'Buffalo schizophrenic'
Oct 28, 2025
125
290
73
Wow, I'm loving the sweet fox. Monique is amazing. If only I could replace her with Cindy. I would make that deal, especially since I also really like her husband, I forgot his name.
This is one of the only games with decent content sharing capabilities.

The NTS branch is very good; it would even be interesting to have the content stolen.
That way I could steal the fox if I lost the blonde. :WeSmart:
 
  • Like
Reactions: olorin20
Dec 7, 2019
72
116
108
Very interested in this one, assuming the sharing is always a 'you cool with this?' as it is so far. Very nice and super hot. The moment Cindy just starts doing her own thing without any input from Will (MC) it just becomes another typical game. These are so few and far between.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkai

Bob XP

Formerly 'Buffalo schizophrenic'
Oct 28, 2025
125
290
73
Very interested in this one, assuming the sharing is always a 'you cool with this?' as it is so far. Very nice and super hot. The moment Cindy just starts doing her own thing without any input from Will (MC) it just becomes another typical game. These are so few and far between.
To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.
so each one follows the path they like. It's something so simple, it wouldn't take much effort.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: RpWolf

Bob XP

Formerly 'Buffalo schizophrenic'
Oct 28, 2025
125
290
73
To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.
so each one follows the path they like. It's something so simple, it wouldn't take much effort.
Sorry, I don't know HappySteveGames' work pace, but we could have each path as an option, like in Cindy and the chubby warrior's sharing.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: RpWolf
Dec 7, 2019
72
116
108
BRO

Just got to the part where Will almost dies but then straight up pulls a superman with the music going and everything.



So HYPED. was straight out of Bleach or something LOOOOL
 

reidanota

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2021
1,228
1,265
254
To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.
so each one follows the path they like. It's something so simple, it wouldn't take much effort.
Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob XP

Bob XP

Formerly 'Buffalo schizophrenic'
Oct 28, 2025
125
290
73
Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
Very good answer. I wish she would continue testing the limits. Will have fun in the end too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reidanota

reidanota

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2021
1,228
1,265
254
Very good answer. I wish she would continue testing the limits. Will have fun in the end too.
I've come to trust this author implicitly. My only wish is that more do so. I have zero expectation that Cindy will ever become a bimbo, loosing it for any opportunity to grab some new cock, or that she'll be the obedient "shy" girl that she almost seemed like, in the last episode. Something's going to come up, but there I put my article of faith number 3: it won't bring "emotional drama" into their relationship. They may be tested by the environment and by the agendas of the "powers that be", but there's no way these two will conform to character types, kink tick boxes and "basic rules of fiction writing".

My only wish is that the present "paroxysm" doesn't mean we're nearing the conclusion of this story, but perhaps the ending of a "season 1", with "season 2" bringing forth a new context, but one where Cindy and Will remain very human, very kinky and very willing to keep having fun, doing mischief, pranking everybody (especially rigid suitors, abusive employers and stuck-up nobles).
do routes matter still? I have used the "skip to latest content" option for the last couple patches, seems like nothing big changes.
Don't think they do. You just get to choose what you see and what you don't see, the main story is unbranched and it spells mostly their rise from the lowest in the social scale, to the top. It would be wasteful to invest time and effort into branching their relationship. Maybe in the very end, just to give people the satisfaction of choosing how and with whom the main characters end? Very much final episode stuff, there's no room in this story for ongoing psychodrama and shit, mistakes, betrayal, revenge, whatever. The story is much simpler (not sketchy, just clear of unnecessary elements) and options are there for people to enjoy seasoning it with as much or as little salt and pepper as they like.
 
Last edited:
Dec 7, 2019
72
116
108
If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
You say that, but the dev has already rewritten scenes that did exactly that. At this point, if Cindy DOES start doing things on her own, say fucking a random suitor without Will's (our) express 'go for it', the dev will have to justify why they went back and started making changes but then went back on it.
 

Machete

Engaged Member
Apr 7, 2020
3,111
5,757
657
Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
I think it depends on the crowd you want to speak to. Most of the 'share with consent' crowd would be pissed if the mail LI start to just plain cheat, no player's control, while the full NTR crowd... Well, i don't really understand them, so i won't speculate much, but it looks like a LI who actually respects MC seems to be unacceptable.

As for myself, whatever is optional and under player's contol goes. As a crowd, i'm an old times fan of Choose Your Own Adventure books and i had the pleasure of meeting Joe Dever a few times, so i'm all for player's agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob XP

Bob XP

Formerly 'Buffalo schizophrenic'
Oct 28, 2025
125
290
73
That's what matters in the end: it's optional. Player control is always important in games, but this way everyone can follow the path they like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Machete

reidanota

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2021
1,228
1,265
254
I think it depends on the crowd you want to speak to. Most of the 'share with consent' crowd would be pissed if the mail LI start to just plain cheat, no player's control, while the full NTR crowd... Well, i don't really understand them, so i won't speculate much, but it looks like a LI who actually respects MC seems to be unacceptable.
I don't quite understand the NTR drive myself. What I'm trying to get across is that Cindy doing something is NOT cheating just because there were no statutes agreed upon, to the article, paragraph, section, sub-section, that mentioned explicitly the act that Cindy did. Cindy gave Will so much to build his trust on, he has no reason whatsoever to imagine she'd jump on some gloryhole dick for any other reason than to tease him, or that she'd suddenly start fucking guys with no control on his (or the player's) part. No contract necessary. It's implied and trusted. They're not in an open relationship. If the player agreed to share Cindy, what she promised Will was that she'd do it to tease him. At the furthermost, she might be pushing him to claim her - because, truly, their dynamic, since the beginning, has been mostly Cindy-driven. She creates the situations, that Will then gladly participates in. There's no malice or lack of respect, so, nothing at all for the NTR crowd. It's 100% consensual, but people must learn to read what's not explicit. It's an author's prerogative, not having to extend themselves in preambles or explanations. Ofc, I could be entirely wrong about it all, but don't think I am.
 

mephistobr

Newbie
Nov 15, 2022
34
91
28
What I'm trying to get across is that Cindy doing something is NOT cheating just because there were no statutes agreed upon, to the article, paragraph, section, sub-section, that mentioned explicitly the act that Cindy did.
That should be obvious, but sadly some people get so attached to their waifus that any sort of agency these fictitous girls have on the relationship dynamic they get scared and start screaming.

Some devs also get scared in consequence and the game just becomes the basic harem, with no real stakes at play, which is fine, but boring.
 
Last edited:
4.40 star(s) 54 Votes