do routes matter still? I have used the "skip to latest content" option for the last couple patches, seems like nothing big changes.i have explored them all
just the sharing vs not sharing thingdo routes matter still? I have used the "skip to latest content" option for the last couple patches, seems like nothing big changes.
the not sharing thing u mean the Cindy optional choices?just the sharing vs not sharing thing
To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.Very interested in this one, assuming the sharing is always a 'you cool with this?' as it is so far. Very nice and super hot. The moment Cindy just starts doing her own thing without any input from Will (MC) it just becomes another typical game. These are so few and far between.
Sorry, I don't know HappySteveGames' work pace, but we could have each path as an option, like in Cindy and the chubby warrior's sharing.To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.
so each one follows the path they like. It's something so simple, it wouldn't take much effort.
Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.To avoid this, there are only two options: make her obey only the MC and the relationship they have, or let her have fun without him, thus pleasing everyone.
so each one follows the path they like. It's something so simple, it wouldn't take much effort.
Very good answer. I wish she would continue testing the limits. Will have fun in the end too.Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
I've come to trust this author implicitly. My only wish is that more do so. I have zero expectation that Cindy will ever become a bimbo, loosing it for any opportunity to grab some new cock, or that she'll be the obedient "shy" girl that she almost seemed like, in the last episode. Something's going to come up, but there I put my article of faith number 3: it won't bring "emotional drama" into their relationship. They may be tested by the environment and by the agendas of the "powers that be", but there's no way these two will conform to character types, kink tick boxes and "basic rules of fiction writing".Very good answer. I wish she would continue testing the limits. Will have fun in the end too.
Don't think they do. You just get to choose what you see and what you don't see, the main story is unbranched and it spells mostly their rise from the lowest in the social scale, to the top. It would be wasteful to invest time and effort into branching their relationship. Maybe in the very end, just to give people the satisfaction of choosing how and with whom the main characters end? Very much final episode stuff, there's no room in this story for ongoing psychodrama and shit, mistakes, betrayal, revenge, whatever. The story is much simpler (not sketchy, just clear of unnecessary elements) and options are there for people to enjoy seasoning it with as much or as little salt and pepper as they like.do routes matter still? I have used the "skip to latest content" option for the last couple patches, seems like nothing big changes.
You say that, but the dev has already rewritten scenes that did exactly that. At this point, if Cindy DOES start doing things on her own, say fucking a random suitor without Will's (our) express 'go for it', the dev will have to justify why they went back and started making changes but then went back on it.If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
I think it depends on the crowd you want to speak to. Most of the 'share with consent' crowd would be pissed if the mail LI start to just plain cheat, no player's control, while the full NTR crowd... Well, i don't really understand them, so i won't speculate much, but it looks like a LI who actually respects MC seems to be unacceptable.Why always EITHER one OR the other? Is the scope of sharing games limited to obedient girlfriends and free use whores? I honestly think people take this too analytically, too black or white. The mood is what counts. If Cindy decides to push her luck - as long as the story makes it abundantly clear that she intended to tease the MC, the mood is the same, it's firmly within their relationship dynamic, regardless of whether or not they discussed it explicitly.
I don't quite understand the NTR drive myself. What I'm trying to get across is that Cindy doing something is NOT cheating just because there were no statutes agreed upon, to the article, paragraph, section, sub-section, that mentioned explicitly the act that Cindy did. Cindy gave Will so much to build his trust on, he has no reason whatsoever to imagine she'd jump on some gloryhole dick for any other reason than to tease him, or that she'd suddenly start fucking guys with no control on his (or the player's) part. No contract necessary. It's implied and trusted. They're not in an open relationship. If the player agreed to share Cindy, what she promised Will was that she'd do it to tease him. At the furthermost, she might be pushing him to claim her - because, truly, their dynamic, since the beginning, has been mostly Cindy-driven. She creates the situations, that Will then gladly participates in. There's no malice or lack of respect, so, nothing at all for the NTR crowd. It's 100% consensual, but people must learn to read what's not explicit. It's an author's prerogative, not having to extend themselves in preambles or explanations. Ofc, I could be entirely wrong about it all, but don't think I am.I think it depends on the crowd you want to speak to. Most of the 'share with consent' crowd would be pissed if the mail LI start to just plain cheat, no player's control, while the full NTR crowd... Well, i don't really understand them, so i won't speculate much, but it looks like a LI who actually respects MC seems to be unacceptable.
That should be obvious, but sadly some people get so attached to their waifus that any sort of agency these fictitous girls have on the relationship dynamic they get scared and start screaming.What I'm trying to get across is that Cindy doing something is NOT cheating just because there were no statutes agreed upon, to the article, paragraph, section, sub-section, that mentioned explicitly the act that Cindy did.