Elhemeer
Conversation Conqueror
- Jun 20, 2022
- 7,898
- 13,303
- 812
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Huh ... when I chose "doesn't matter" I got Amanda. ... I wonder if that's randomized (although if it is, it happens before the choice, 'cause I reloaded 3 times and always got Amanda)Yup, I was about to post the same myself.
If you choose "Girl", it'll be a girl.
If you choose "Boy" or "Doesn't matter", it'll be a boy.
I had to reopen the archived copy and double-check the script/code again. You're right, I misremembered. Choosing "Girl" or "Doesn't matter" gets you a daughter, while choosing "Boy" gets you a son. (I've corrected my previous post with this.)Huh ... when I chose "doesn't matter" I got Amanda. ... I wonder if that's randomized (although if it is, it happens before the choice, 'cause I reloaded 3 times and always got Amanda)
I had to reopen the archived copy and double-check the script/code again. You're right, I misremembered. Choosing "Girl" or "Doesn't matter" gets you a daughter, while choosing "Boy" gets you a son. (I've corrected my previous post with this.)
The MC in this one is fairly solid. For me the story & especially the ending was the problem. Neither lived up to the level of A Knights Tale which was a disappointment considering how Couples started.How's the protagonist in this one?
Like in A Knight's Tale?
Valid points, choice of individuals with perhaps some other observations from experiences may be considered.Wait... let me unpack this:
1- You seem to suspect that Claire had a thing for Amy
2- That she invited Amy and Katie to live with them so she could get into her pants
3- And she created a situation where she could do it without cheating
That seems to be your argument, right?
Now, the mutual attraction between Clair and Amy was obvious, completely in the open and the MC even asks his girlfriend if she feels that way, she confirms, asks if he has any issue with it, to what he says he doesn't. So, nothing underhanded, hidden, or manipulative.
Claire only picks up the idea and runs with it, after Amy buying a random magazine while waiting for Katie, where she finds an article about Open Relationships and/or swinging. Amy mentions the article, lighting up a fire in Claire's crotch. She can now see a way to keep her beloved boyfriend and maybe fulfill an old desire and have Amy too. So, if anything, it's Amy's fault for buying that magazine, reading that article and mentioning it to Claire.
The relationship between the 4 of them evolves to something where there's no cheating, no jealousy, no manipulations, no deceit.
And after all this, you still feel that:
1- Your Girlfriend created a situation where you now have 3 girlfriends
2- That she did it because she wanted to have a relationship with her BFF
3- And that even if you now have 3x more pussy, you lost something..........
Mate, I think you need therapy. Or get laid. Maybe both.
Peace![]()
Looks like Texas Hold 'em. If Claire's the one with Ace/3 on the bottom right then, yes. She has 3 aces. Whoever has the pair of queens on the top left actually has 3 queens. The 5 cards in a row in the middle are communal cards. Each player starts with 2 and bets as each of the middle cards is placed/turned over.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Seen worse. This is a New Vegas screenie...You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Well, that's COMPLETELY different from the op. 6 kings of diamonds is wild, but the other post at least seems possible with a single deck of cards. That said, I have a few hundred hours in NV and never seen that happen. You running mods?
It's not a card game, they're just out on a table like that. In one of the Jacobstown bungalows IIRC.Well, that's COMPLETELY different from the op. 6 kings of diamonds is wild, but the other post at least seems possible with a single deck of cards. That said, I have a few hundred hours in NV and never seen that happen. You running mods?
Ah, I see. Almost seems like a Wild Wasteland encounter because that's an insane hand.It's not a card game, they're just out on a table like that. In one of the Jacobstown bungalows IIRC.
Is that five of a kind or a royal flush?
It's not a royal flush. But it's an impossible hand in any variant of poker I know.Is that five of a kind or a royal flush?
Claire is declared the winner (Amy has the full house).Looks like Texas Hold 'em. If Claire's the one with Ace/3 on the bottom right then, yes. She has 3 aces. Whoever has the pair of queens on the top left actually has 3 queens. The 5 cards in a row in the middle are communal cards. Each player starts with 2 and bets as each of the middle cards is placed/turned over.
TBF, I haven't played this yet, let alone that far, so I'm not sure what the issue is if there is one.
Oh yeah, that's dumb. If it was 4 of a kind, sure.Claire is declared the winner (Amy has the full house).
If you wanted to force it, you could define a royal flush as "five cards of the same suit consisting only of cards with a rank between ten and ace". That definition is sufficient for the way poker is supposed to be played. The cool thing is that it would be a natural royal flush, since it does not use jokers or wild cards, and it would beat five aces (i.e. an ace of each suit + a joker, not a situation with that player doing the same thing). Of course, the problem then becomes explaining how you made such a hand legitimately. Details, details.It's not a royal flush. But it's an impossible hand in any variant of poker I know.![]()
But it's no longer a straight, which is part of the definitions I've seen...If you wanted to force it, you could define a royal flush as "five cards of the same suit consisting only of cards with a rank between ten and ace". That definition is sufficient for the way poker is supposed to be played. The cool thing is that it would be a natural royal flush, since it does not use jokers or wild cards, and it would beat five aces (i.e. an ace of each suit + a joker, not a situation with that player doing the same thing). Of course, the problem then becomes explaining how you made such a hand legitimately. Details, details.