Elhemeer

Conversation Conqueror
Jun 20, 2022
7,898
13,303
812
Yup, I was about to post the same myself.

If you choose "Girl", it'll be a girl.
If you choose "Boy" or "Doesn't matter", it'll be a boy.
Huh ... when I chose "doesn't matter" I got Amanda. ... I wonder if that's randomized (although if it is, it happens before the choice, 'cause I reloaded 3 times and always got Amanda)
 

JGNeon

Well-Known Member
Modder
Feb 24, 2021
1,037
6,400
647
Huh ... when I chose "doesn't matter" I got Amanda. ... I wonder if that's randomized (although if it is, it happens before the choice, 'cause I reloaded 3 times and always got Amanda)
I had to reopen the archived copy and double-check the script/code again. You're right, I misremembered. Choosing "Girl" or "Doesn't matter" gets you a daughter, while choosing "Boy" gets you a son. (I've corrected my previous post with this.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elhemeer

Elhemeer

Conversation Conqueror
Jun 20, 2022
7,898
13,303
812
I had to reopen the archived copy and double-check the script/code again. You're right, I misremembered. Choosing "Girl" or "Doesn't matter" gets you a daughter, while choosing "Boy" gets you a son. (I've corrected my previous post with this.)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
:sneaky:
 
  • Hey there
Reactions: JGNeon

Tonarestriga

Newbie
Aug 31, 2021
39
52
142
How's the protagonist in this one?
Like in A Knight's Tale?
The MC in this one is fairly solid. For me the story & especially the ending was the problem. Neither lived up to the level of A Knights Tale which was a disappointment considering how Couples started.
 

Warezinc

Newbie
Aug 15, 2025
54
76
18
God im about 1/6th into this and its so utterly dull. Theyre having breakfast, dinner, and going on little outtings but we dont really get to know any of the characters and there is just 0 drama. Noone has a tingle for someone else, noones accidently seen anyone naked in the shower or something, I hope it picks up a bit because this is a very bland two pieces of whitebread with some cheese sandwhich so far.
 

MrD812

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2021
1,717
2,687
330
Wait... let me unpack this:

1- You seem to suspect that Claire had a thing for Amy
2- That she invited Amy and Katie to live with them so she could get into her pants
3- And she created a situation where she could do it without cheating

That seems to be your argument, right?

Now, the mutual attraction between Clair and Amy was obvious, completely in the open and the MC even asks his girlfriend if she feels that way, she confirms, asks if he has any issue with it, to what he says he doesn't. So, nothing underhanded, hidden, or manipulative.

Claire only picks up the idea and runs with it, after Amy buying a random magazine while waiting for Katie, where she finds an article about Open Relationships and/or swinging. Amy mentions the article, lighting up a fire in Claire's crotch. She can now see a way to keep her beloved boyfriend and maybe fulfill an old desire and have Amy too. So, if anything, it's Amy's fault for buying that magazine, reading that article and mentioning it to Claire.

The relationship between the 4 of them evolves to something where there's no cheating, no jealousy, no manipulations, no deceit.

And after all this, you still feel that:
1- Your Girlfriend created a situation where you now have 3 girlfriends
2- That she did it because she wanted to have a relationship with her BFF
3- And that even if you now have 3x more pussy, you lost something..........

Mate, I think you need therapy. Or get laid. Maybe both.

Peace :FacePalm:
Valid points, choice of individuals with perhaps some other observations from experiences may be considered.
Transparencies of life-partners choice, can very with amounts of how direct they are (or are not) for whatever intents and purposes.
Could Clair have been more blunt with her intent, yes & clearly desirable especially involving others.

No one is perfect, many think between their leg's and As encompassing the allure, having multi life-partners breeds.
Blatant authenticity between said partners can avoid undue trauma of drama adherent in many a scenario.
They made their choices, come what may.
 

RapideRabbit

Newbie
Mar 1, 2019
77
54
133
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Looks like Texas Hold 'em. If Claire's the one with Ace/3 on the bottom right then, yes. She has 3 aces. Whoever has the pair of queens on the top left actually has 3 queens. The 5 cards in a row in the middle are communal cards. Each player starts with 2 and bets as each of the middle cards is placed/turned over.

TBF, I haven't played this yet, let alone that far, so I'm not sure what the issue is if there is one.
 

e6mill

Forum Fanatic
Aug 4, 2022
4,652
9,385
628
Well, that's COMPLETELY different from the op. 6 kings of diamonds is wild, but the other post at least seems possible with a single deck of cards. That said, I have a few hundred hours in NV and never seen that happen. You running mods?
It's not a card game, they're just out on a table like that. In one of the Jacobstown bungalows IIRC.
 

RapideRabbit

Newbie
Mar 1, 2019
77
54
133
It's not a card game, they're just out on a table like that. In one of the Jacobstown bungalows IIRC.
Ah, I see. Almost seems like a Wild Wasteland encounter because that's an insane hand.

Are there any clues towards a shootout in the area? Y'know, environmental storytelling? I wouldn't put it past Obsidian to leave that on the table and a few dead bodies in the corner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatGiant

Elhemeer

Conversation Conqueror
Jun 20, 2022
7,898
13,303
812
Looks like Texas Hold 'em. If Claire's the one with Ace/3 on the bottom right then, yes. She has 3 aces. Whoever has the pair of queens on the top left actually has 3 queens. The 5 cards in a row in the middle are communal cards. Each player starts with 2 and bets as each of the middle cards is placed/turned over.

TBF, I haven't played this yet, let alone that far, so I'm not sure what the issue is if there is one.
Claire is declared the winner (Amy has the full house).
 

TBone9

Member
Apr 6, 2023
385
884
216
It's not a royal flush. But it's an impossible hand in any variant of poker I know. :)
If you wanted to force it, you could define a royal flush as "five cards of the same suit consisting only of cards with a rank between ten and ace". That definition is sufficient for the way poker is supposed to be played. The cool thing is that it would be a natural royal flush, since it does not use jokers or wild cards, and it would beat five aces (i.e. an ace of each suit + a joker, not a situation with that player doing the same thing). Of course, the problem then becomes explaining how you made such a hand legitimately. Details, details.
 

e6mill

Forum Fanatic
Aug 4, 2022
4,652
9,385
628
If you wanted to force it, you could define a royal flush as "five cards of the same suit consisting only of cards with a rank between ten and ace". That definition is sufficient for the way poker is supposed to be played. The cool thing is that it would be a natural royal flush, since it does not use jokers or wild cards, and it would beat five aces (i.e. an ace of each suit + a joker, not a situation with that player doing the same thing). Of course, the problem then becomes explaining how you made such a hand legitimately. Details, details.
But it's no longer a straight, which is part of the definitions I've seen...
 
2.80 star(s) 36 Votes