VN Ren'Py Daddy Daughter Love [v0.054] [BabysWithRabys]

3.10 star(s) 31 Votes

-CookieMonster666-

Devoted Member
Nov 20, 2018
11,302
16,510
View attachment 3122851
DDL Version 0.053 available now
View attachment 3122861
Dev went somewhat beside the norm with the animations in this one ...
3 of the animations will get rede and will be fixed by next update In the mean time ... girls feel the right amount of awesome all day.

View attachment 3122864
Canto!!! Buddy, I haven't seen anything from you in forever. I hope you're doing well, my friend. And I agree with you about the girls. They are adorable to me. :love:
 

jI11jaCksjAkk

Member
Jun 26, 2023
489
746
You have to have the assets, or they would not look right
Don't really know if that is true anymore. :unsure: Judging by the deepfakes and AI content that is everywhere now. I don't see any reason AI couldn't be trained to (a) mimic the style of the game renders using the existing CG and then (b) give it the Gold Edition CG (as far as it got) as new target criteria for the newer renders since the GE was put on hiatus. I'm not an expert on anything modern, but that sort of thing was manually possible (if laborious) in the "olden days" before AI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exocrine

jI11jaCksjAkk

Member
Jun 26, 2023
489
746
By assets, I mean models, you have to have assets of the models, otherwise it is just a different story
And I meant that I don't agree that that is required any more given the technology available and the fact that there are enough renders in the game files to at least be able to train AI to modify existing renders according to specific parameters. All that is really needed is to shrink the absurd oversized breasts and adjust facial proportions, not reinvention of the wheel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exocrine

lapdragon

Member
Sep 28, 2017
122
219
And I meant that I don't agree that that is required any more given the technology available and the fact that there are enough renders in the game files to at least be able to train AI to modify existing renders according to specific parameters. All that is really needed is to shrink the absurd oversized breasts and adjust facial proportions, not reinvention of the wheel.
Doing that would likely violate the TOS of any AI utility that you tried to use for it - they'll all have stipulations against using it for CP, which is what the Gold edition was.
 

jI11jaCksjAkk

Member
Jun 26, 2023
489
746
Doing that would likely violate the TOS of any AI utility that you tried to use for it - they'll all have stipulations against using it for CP, which is what the Gold edition was.
Oh no! :eek: A TOS violation?! Heavens! Like there isn't AI porn of every variety (probably all in violation of some TOS provision) all over the internet. You do understand that TYS = CYA, right? :rolleyes:
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Richard Perkins

-CookieMonster666-

Devoted Member
Nov 20, 2018
11,302
16,510
Oh no! :eek: A TOS violation?! Heavens! Like there isn't AI porn of every variety (probably all in violation of some TOS provision) all over the internet. You do understand that TYS = CYA, right? :rolleyes:
For the creators of the utility, sure. I'm pretty sure everyone gets that. However, whether other people violate TOS or not, anyone deciding to use it for something other than what the TOS says is acceptable puts themselves at risk. The risk isn't really by the AI software creators; I doubt any of them would try to sue someone over misusing their software. The actual threat is from whatever government authorities may catch wind of what they're doing. So the risk might be minimal / nonexistent in some jurisdictions while being very real and serious in others.

I do find it humorous that you think others doing something gets anyone off the hook. "But officer, look: he killed my buddy next to me. Obviously hunting him down the next day should be fine, right?" What a silly excuse for knowingly violating an agreement and potentially the law. Not to mention, this violation is just a tiny bit more serious than, say, playing unlicensed music at a wedding or something.
 

Richard Perkins

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2017
1,239
723
If I had any of the assets, then I could create a "Gold" version of my own. Follow the line of the script (Almost from word to word). I would not mind doing it, I'm too old to care about getting caught anyway not like they should,
 

jI11jaCksjAkk

Member
Jun 26, 2023
489
746
For the creators of the utility, sure. I'm pretty sure everyone gets that. However, whether other people violate TOS or not, anyone deciding to use it for something other than what the TOS says is acceptable puts themselves at risk. The risk isn't really by the AI software creators; I doubt any of them would try to sue someone over misusing their software. The actual threat is from whatever government authorities may catch wind of what they're doing. So the risk might be minimal / nonexistent in some jurisdictions while being very real and serious in others.

I do find it humorous that you think others doing something gets anyone off the hook. "But officer, look: he killed my buddy next to me. Obviously hunting him down the next day should be fine, right?" What a silly excuse for knowingly violating an agreement and potentially the law. Not to mention, this violation is just a tiny bit more serious than, say, playing unlicensed music at a wedding or something.
Your points are not invalid, I just think they are a bit unrealistic. My mention of all the other porn made with AI software already out there has nothing to do with justifying one act by pointing out that other people also did it, but as clear evidence of the fact that nobody seems to give a hoot if users are using the software for porn purposes, and that TOS's are therefore nothing more than a (weak) firewall to try and limit legal action against providers ("Hey look, we said they shouldn't do X so how can you blame us if they did X anyway?")

Now, I don't know anything about whether different AI puts any sort of a digital watermark on the output, which might be a deterrent to users to some degree. But - again - given that there is so much material already out there I have to conclude that there are at least some AI options that don't, and so people making porn use those. But your POV sounds more like you are concerned about the "right" or "wrong" of porn, since your focus is on the minutiae of small-print legal language whose actual legal relevance would vary across the thousands of different legal jusrisdictions around the globe. If you have issues with porn, I think maybe you are in the wrong place? If not, it's great that you seem to care about the well-being of AI users out there using it to make porn, but I'm sure they know what they're doing and can make their own choices without either of us in their ears. :)
 

-CookieMonster666-

Devoted Member
Nov 20, 2018
11,302
16,510
But your POV sounds more like you are concerned about the "right" or "wrong" of porn, since your focus is on the minutiae of small-print legal language whose actual legal relevance would vary across the thousands of different legal jusrisdictions around the globe. If you have issues with porn, I think maybe you are in the wrong place? If not, it's great that you seem to care about the well-being of AI users out there using it to make porn, but I'm sure they know what they're doing and can make their own choices without either of us in their ears. :)
Laugh-spit-H2O.gif

Now you're just making shit up about me or something. :rolleyes: I discuss points you hadn't addressed and suddenly I'm either a prude who got lost on the Internet or am "Big Uncle Mike", looking out for people I don't even know? OK, bro. Good "chat". ROFLMMFAO.
 

jI11jaCksjAkk

Member
Jun 26, 2023
489
746
View attachment 3137072

Now you're just making shit up about me or something. :rolleyes: I discuss points you hadn't addressed and suddenly I'm either a prude who got lost on the Internet or am "Big Uncle Mike", looking out for people I don't even know? OK, bro. Good "chat". ROFLMMFAO.
I didn't intend to 'make anything up' about you personally, but I think I did accidentally conflate your post with previous posts thinking you were someone else. My apologies, but this probably should be expected from time to time when you reply as a 3rd party to an exchange between 2 other people. But for sure my impression of the tone of the no-no-don't-use-AI-for-this-it's-too-dangerous side of things feeling slightly moralistic/preachy definitely came from a different post than yours. My mistake, and I regret the error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -CookieMonster666-

Exocrine

Active Member
May 12, 2023
505
767
Does anyone know the name of this one game where the guy's stepdaughter moves in with him? She cuts her hair afterwards. And he dreams about her and her friends being fairies. He scores with her friends but -- the last time I checked, he didn't seal the deal with the stepdaughter yet.
 
3.10 star(s) 31 Votes