Thank you for completely ignoring the point that I made.
No, like I said before, I did finish that fight, but only because I stuck with it long enough to figure out the poorly explained mechanics.
Further, a thing which you must pass with retries before progressing is not "it ends your game". You know that, I think...because you can formulate sentences. I am sorry but your explanation holds less water than your initial review. What you just said is NOT what you said in review, and I think you know it.
Okay, let me explain this.
I am not that clever, sir. I lost once. I won easily the second try. Are you really prepared to tell me that it took you 55 tries to figure out that battle-mechanic?
No, I was exaggerating to get you to fathom that some people might not be willing to try a poorly explained combat sequence more than a few times.
A ton of games manifest a "must lose" battle at the start of their narrative, to demonstrate how the mechanic of reviving works, ect. To say that "this impossible battle ends your game when you lose", is miles away from the reality you just expressed. As we discussed a month ago, I have no issue with your assertion that the explanations were lacking, but what you said was far more overt than that. You said "it ends your game" and no matter how much you excuse that, it does not end anyone's game. If someone ends their own game, at the tutorial, then that is their choice. You know that is not at all what you said.
MY whole intention in the post that started this particular conversation, was to tell people that reviews are not for the Dev. They are for people who may or may not consider trying a game to form their own opinion. If you take liberties with your scathing review, and act like you are doing it as objective criticism for the benefit of the Dev, I disagree with your perspective. You can post in the tread all day long, to communicate with the Dev, but you posted to communicate with everyone that looks at "weighted ratings" of games...which is most people, I imagine.
Again, an infinite loop that keeps the game from progressing due to poorly explained is essentially the end of the game.
You keep calling it "infinite" and using rhetorical examples like "55 times" which you then will excuse as "an exaggeration" when it suits you. Own your hyperbolic rhetoric, if you want to keep using it. Please stop using then then acting like it is understood to be hyperbole by people who have no experience with the game. They do not know you are being hyperbolic when you say "you play for 20 mins, then if you lose it ends your game". You know this, or you are not old enough to be on this site - so why are you doing it?
Get over it, it's not even there anymore. You're trying to argue over a review that no longer exists.
Absolute genius. Lie, then remove the lies, and tell anyone who noticed your lies to just "get over it", because there is no longer prof you said it. Earlier I just thought you were ruled by your emotional response, but now I think you are actually full of shit.
The tutorial didn't make me mad, the lack of an explanation confused me, at best. You're doing your best to point out a needle in a sea of knives, and it looks pathetic.
"I am not an ass-hole, because I will not be punished for my behavior." Yup, that is a solid argument, sir. I wish you a good day as well. Please be truthful in future reviews.
People telling lies to propagate their emotional ratings of games is an issue that does exist, and I WILL have fun nitpicking liars. Thank you.
You showed up after a discussion and broke up the argument that had already ended. Was that really necessary?
