- Jun 5, 2018
- 157
- 1,161
- Feb 12, 2019
- 308
- 3,439
- Jun 12, 2020
- 1,456
- 22,267
- Jul 22, 2019
- 535
- 4,091
Last pic of Majandra.
Complete series:
Complete series:
- Jul 26, 2021
- 54
- 1,073
- Feb 7, 2018
- 250
- 2,072
These are epic!!! Great work. Are you developing anything or just in it for the art?
- Jan 3, 2018
- 137
- 3,006
Very cool, how did you get that chromatic aberration and bloom effect? Looks really good!
- Aug 31, 2020
- 551
- 7,000
- Jul 3, 2021
- 732
- 13,135
- Jul 26, 2021
- 54
- 1,073
Went for a third one but went too fast and wrong lol, too late to redo.
Raw render for posterity
Tried the new thing,
Don't see real benefit either in open or closed scene so far, maybe I miss something.
Raw render for posterity
Tried the new thing,
You must be registered to see the links
, not sure about it.Don't see real benefit either in open or closed scene so far, maybe I miss something
.
- Apr 14, 2019
- 3,596
- 39,486
I like it a lot actually. If I had one critique it'd be that the image seems blown out. And I'm not talking about tone mapping itself, but specifically for the bloom. With the bloom removed it'd look like a cozy summer mid day.
- Jun 4, 2019
- 3,375
- 13,570
An attempt at producing a South Pacific/Maori girl. A surfer girl, for the time being known as Maia.
Scene is alright for the time I put (imho, more or less). Doesn't look like it, but lightning is 100% awful tho. Terribad pixel convergence so brute-forced result, crappy noise in sensible area, un-milkable skin detail, barely workable postwork render. Sometime you must admit you were wrong and should redo that \o/
- Oct 18, 2019
- 350
- 5,164
Well, I thought that was the result you were going for. High key and washed out. If you wanted a realistic render then yes, it needs more work. Then again, keep in mind the scene. As a viewer, I assume I'm at 2-3 meters away from her. Now I know that my eyesight isn't 20/20, hell it isn't even 12/12 but at that distance, I don't expect to see any high frequency detail on the skin. I know it's a rabbit hole, and hell..check half my posts here and you'll easily notice I'm guilty as charged, but at that distance, if I saw any skin pores or vellus hair, it'd definitely be physically inaccurate. Especially considering the /very/ strong light washing over her.
As for the noise..Either run a denoiser on the saved render, or just learn to live with it. Leaving most of my renders to converge 100% and over 5000 samples, even in flat lighting conditions I still get tons of noise.
- Sep 18, 2021
- 235
- 7,528
