3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

5.00 star(s) 12 Votes

X3rr4

Active Member
Game Developer
Jul 24, 2018
742
14,336
Angel-Pete: "I don't think they can stop what's coming this time."

Mama-Earth-Hanna: "They might. They get their greatest strength from the same source as their greatest weakness, being only human."

Only Humans [feat. Hanna and Pete].jpg

And this is the song for it
 

Willibrordus

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2020
1,113
6,492
To all the guys and girls here,try to find more Realistic Eyes,it will make your Render look better ;)
(no offense)
We're open to more useful suggestions..
links to "better" assets than we use.
Names of Asset makers that create "better" ones than we use,
Examples of your "better" art than we make.
Whats wrong with these eyes in your opinion?
DB5 Villa Toscana.png
 
Last edited:

DrkPhoenix

Member
May 12, 2018
126
907
Thanks, so you just set the iterations to a lot and let it cook until it looks okay to you then you stop it?
I am curious now, which pixel filter do you use, Gaussian, Mitchell and Lanczos etc. same question goes to other people in here. I know there's a difference but I don't know what it is.
I also use mitchell set at 0.80
 

Night Hacker

Forum Fanatic
Jul 3, 2021
4,426
21,917
Thanks, so you just set the iterations to a lot and let it cook until it looks okay to you then you stop it?
I am curious now, which pixel filter do you use, Gaussian, Mitchell and Lanczos etc. same question goes to other people in here. I know there's a difference but I don't know what it is.
I ran tests using those filters on other software (Irfanview) and saved different images and compared. In the end, i found the Gaussian filter to be the smoothest, uses more blurring resulting is less sharpening. I found Lanczos to result in really sharp images, too sharp as I found it also emphasized noise in the image as well. I found the Mitchell filter to be the best with a nice balance of sharpness, without overdoing it causing noise. So I tend to use it (Mitchell). And as I have stated in the past, I use the Denoiser in my filter settings as well as you don't need as many iterations (I find 200 iterations is enough with denoising) to create a nice image, and the image doesn't have that grainy noise which bugs me.

BUT, everyone is different. I have posted the following two images in the past to illustrate my point. You cannot tell which of these two images used denoising and which did not at a glance.
But one of these used denoising, with 200 iterations and took me 5 mins. The other one did not use denoising and took me 45 mins.... you tell me if it is worth waiting 40 extra mins? I don't think so....

Wanda_at_the_Beach 1.png

Wanda_at_the_Beach - 2.png
 

HawkyDawky

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2019
1,155
1,613
I ran tests using those filters on other software (Irfanview) and saved different images and compared. In the end, i found the Gaussian filter to be the smoothest, uses more blurring resulting is less sharpening. I found Lanczos to result in really sharp images, too sharp as I found it also emphasized noise in the image as well. I found the Mitchell filter to be the best with a nice balance of sharpness, without overdoing it causing noise. So I tend to use it (Mitchell). And as I have stated in the past, I use the Denoiser in my filter settings as well as you don't need as many iterations (I find 200 iterations is enough with denoising) to create a nice image, and the image doesn't have that grainy noise which bugs me.

BUT, everyone is different. I have posted the following two images in the past to illustrate my point. You cannot tell which of these two images used denoising and which did not at a glance.
But one of these used denoising, with 200 iterations and took me 5 mins. The other one did not use denoising and took me 45 mins.... you tell me if it is worth waiting 40 extra mins? I don't think so....

View attachment 1740322

View attachment 1740324
Both are beautiful...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Hacker

Rizo

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2017
1,204
5,964
I ran tests using those filters on other software (Irfanview) and saved different images and compared. In the end, i found the Gaussian filter to be the smoothest, uses more blurring resulting is less sharpening. I found Lanczos to result in really sharp images, too sharp as I found it also emphasized noise in the image as well. I found the Mitchell filter to be the best with a nice balance of sharpness, without overdoing it causing noise. So I tend to use it (Mitchell). And as I have stated in the past, I use the Denoiser in my filter settings as well as you don't need as many iterations (I find 200 iterations is enough with denoising) to create a nice image, and the image doesn't have that grainy noise which bugs me.

BUT, everyone is different. I have posted the following two images in the past to illustrate my point. You cannot tell which of these two images used denoising and which did not at a glance.
But one of these used denoising, with 200 iterations and took me 5 mins. The other one did not use denoising and took me 45 mins.... you tell me if it is worth waiting 40 extra mins? I don't think so....

View attachment 1740322

View attachment 1740324
Oh I really can't tell the difference. Okay stupid question time. How do I manually set the amount of iterations and what's the best time for the denoiser to activate? I know there won't be a perfect number for it but I honestly still have no idea what does what when it comes to all the render tabs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Hacker

jackmancactus

Member
Apr 8, 2018
207
4,607
Oh I really can't tell the difference. Okay stupid question time. How do I manually set the amount of iterations and what's the best time for the denoiser to activate? I know there won't be a perfect number for it but I honestly still have no idea what does what when it comes to all the render tabs.
If you turn render quality off in the progressive rendering tab it will go to whatever iteration number you set.
 
5.00 star(s) 12 Votes