3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

[M0rD0l]

Why is she teasing me like this ?

I don't know

 

[Mybi87]

 

[LBW]

 

[Mando Logica]

How do you get such good detail! Like there's no noise and the textures all look so good! I know you should use higher resolution assets but even that can only do so much. Seriously teach me! Also finally got around to making a balcony shot. Think it came out okay. View attachment 1738519

I give the iteration its proper time based on the resolution and the shadows/darkness in the photo because I prefer not to use a denoiser tool. But the render takes more time, of course

 

[uncleomf]

I give the iteration its proper time based on the resolution and the shadows/darkness in the photo because I prefer not to use a denoiser tool. But the render takes more time, of course

How many iterations did it take to get that masterpiece?

 

[Mando Logica]

How many iterations did it take to get that masterpiece?

That's kind of you, uncleomf! It is 2K, so I did it in 7000 iterations.

 

[Deleted member 34473]

View attachment 1739073

as always exceptional, fantastic work

 

[Old DVD]

 

[DocKlunk]

 

[rasikamehra051]

Adventures of the lost temple...

 

[Jennova21]

My first shot at using Filament.

Filament could be really good, it lacks the realism of Iray, but with a little creative lighting I think it looks not too bad. For those working on VNs, Filament could save loads of time, but, and this is a big but, hair is such a pain to get right that it negates any time savings. Really wish Daz would get their act together and sort this out. The image above required a lot post work.

 

[Rizo]

I give the iteration its proper time based on the resolution and the shadows/darkness in the photo because I prefer not to use a denoiser tool. But the render takes more time, of course

Thanks, so you just set the iterations to a lot and let it cook until it looks okay to you then you stop it?
I am curious now, which pixel filter do you use, Gaussian, Mitchell and Lanczos etc. same question goes to other people in here. I know there's a difference but I don't know what it is.

 

[KingCorrosiv]

Thanks, so you just set the iterations to a lot and let it cook until it looks okay to you then you stop it?
I am curious now, which pixel filter do you use, Gaussian, Mitchell and Lanczos etc. same question goes to other people in here. I know there's a difference but I don't know what it is.

I personally mainly use Mitchell and set the filter to 0.8

 

[Willibrordus]

Thanks, so you just set the iterations to a lot and let it cook until it looks okay to you then you stop it?
I am curious now, which pixel filter do you use, Gaussian, Mitchell and Lanczos etc. same question goes to other people in here. I know there's a difference but I don't know what it is.

I personally mainly use Mitchell and set the filter to 0.8

I also use Mitchell at 0.8 it gives a sharper result than the default values. (provided you get the focus spot on)
and for the Iterations I stick with a minimum of 7000 and just let it run to a 100%.
Below is one I did with those settings.
I never use denoising since that is a detail killer and then the choice of Mitchell at 0.8 would be undone.

 

[Atton563]

I also use Mitchell at 0.8 it gives a sharper result than the default values. (provided you get the focus spot on)
and for the Iterations I stick with a minimum of 7000 and just let it run to a 100%.
Below is one I did with those settings.
I never use denoising since that is a detail killer and then the choice of Mitchell at 0.8 would be undone.
View attachment 1739690

I have pretty much the same but I turn the denoiser on for the last 100-200 iterations since the later it comes on the less detail is lost.

 

[Willibrordus]

I have pretty much the same but I turn the denoiser on for the last 100-200 iterations since the later it comes on the less detail is lost.

I'm able to get the noise under control without denoiser even on darker scenes like example. So I opt to not use it at all.

 

[Vario_R]

Trying something new!

 

[SStyliss3D]

To all the guys and girls here,try to find more Realistic Eyes,it will make your Render look better
(no offense)

 

[KingCorrosiv]

I also use Mitchell at 0.8 it gives a sharper result than the default values. (provided you get the focus spot on)
and for the Iterations I stick with a minimum of 7000 and just let it run to a 100%.
Below is one I did with those settings.
I never use denoising since that is a detail killer and then the choice of Mitchell at 0.8 would be undone.
View attachment 1739690

Same except i use 10000 iterations for non VN renders and 5000 for VN renders (Time and quality balance)
Animations are the only things i use denoise for since you can't have a 180 frame animation with 5000 iterations each without having to render the thing for a week non stop. So i tend to use 300 iterations and start denoise at 280. It removes some detail sure but it doesn't butcher it. and with some tactical use of Lightroom you can even bring the detail back a bit.

 

[KingCorrosiv]

I have pretty much the same but I turn the denoiser on for the last 100-200 iterations since the later it comes on the less detail is lost.

You'd probably be fine with only using denoise for the last 20-30 iterations my man.