That's the nice thing about this thread. Pro's and beginner in one thread and most of the time no flaming and only friendly people who are willing to help and share their experience. You can see great art and get usefull tips.It's fascinating seeing the range of "levels" of mastery of the medium--no disrespect intended. All the way from Junior High Art Class level beginner to Master of Fine Arts level polish and mastery, or the digital art equivalent thereof. But I see creativity at every level of skill posted here.
many thx,
Do you know where the difference is between this one and the inbuild one from DAZ studio?
I use Denoiser without a batch file so
This will only remove unwanted pixels from the image. And the DAZ denoiser will have +/- impact on the rendering depending on the settings you give him, it will go from the barbie doll and a crazy thing. But you have to find the right dosage with DAZ, so you have to play the wizard's apprentice.
Girl from the left..
She looks at the girl on the right, I have a little missing eyes, and the pose is for gf3 apply on gf3. I replaced the character on the left to place it on the bed but with the fatigue I didn't touch the scene to do something good, it was just to test my light at the base.
Ah, thanks for that info.
From my own experience it depends upon the scene setup. If you have a scene with high intensity emissive sources that generate firefly's then the post render denoiser is far superior. Should you be using predominately HDRI's then the Daz Denoiser may be a better option. From what I have seen it seems to blur more than denoise, hence it removes data from pixels that did not require changing.
