First of all, he commented like every 2weeks in this thread, isnt that regular?
No.
Regular intervals - Times that are seperated by an equal amount. The dates of his "regular" comments are irregular and average out as sporadic at best.
And if not couldn't Count Morado just have wrote the amount of times that guy commented in this thread.
He could have. He didn't.
None of us are required to restrict ourselves only to making statements without being willing to provide proof of what we say. Especially when someone's gaslighting by trying to make it appear as though a response was a "misunderstanding" of what they had said and misrepresenting that said response was tonally "aggressive" and "thoughtless".
Instead he wrote some lines for every comment of him. Why? For what purpose? Just to bash him on a personal level.
Meanwhile you're making an assertion that Count Morado has some sort of vested interest in "humiliating" him... Why?
Why are you ascribing a specific intent to Count Morado's actions?
Have you even observed the context of both posts by going back over what was said in all the recent posts that are relevant to the conversation?
And tbh i wouldn't be proud of having thousands of comments in a porn game forum.
Yes, that's evident from your current seventeen comments in approximately seven years.
Anyone can now easily infer that you feel some sort of shame for being a member on a piracy forum that is focused primarily on the distribution of pornographic materials, and that you see yourself as somehow being superior to the rest of us who are more active across these forums...
Should i now investigate in which comment he was simping for a character or some other things and make fun of it like he did?
That's up to you.
If you do decide to go down that road, you'll have to restrict yourself to the contents from within this thread only, since you're all about being proportinal.
Is that cool? In my opinion not.
Nobody thinks it's cool, and right now the only person who comes close to caring about your opinion is me, and that's only on the grounds of responding to and addressing the content of your reply to me.
Also most of the comments of the guy he was attacking
Your interpretation of his action as being an attack is very biased. Some would say, that you're taking it personally...
Why try to be so harmful towards someone because he not even in a malicious way showed his impatience?
Firstly, you're agreeing with Count Morado that the other guy has a history of being impatient with the progress of development.
Something that's only evident because Count Morado both stated and showed proof of it.
Second, you're again interpreting his actions as being harmful to someone else (entirely subjective) and seem to be taking offense on behalf of someone else. That's virtue signaling.
The whole answer of Count M stands in no proportion to the things written. The "he made it personal..." is just nonsense.
Your belief of what is and isn't proportional is just that - Your belief.
What I said was not nonsense.
I specifically wrote "personal", quotation marks included, was because you are the one saying that Count Morado's words were a personal attack on someone else, and then said that what he did was a " real dickmove, tbh".
The only dick-move done by anyone in this context is from both you and just448.
You for being offended on his part, and him for doing similar to what you've been doing - Making unverified statements of Count Morado's intent and emotional state in regards to the tonal content of what he wrote in one post. He was perfectly justified in his response to what just448 had replied to him, and the way he did was entirely proportional as well.
