- Nov 15, 2020
- 1,492
- 3,163
That's the entire question.I'm not talking about ethics here, just about instincts. Kitty is an incredibly sweet thing. The General didn't do anything specially horrible to the MC. He didn't kill his family, didn't rape his daughters. What do you want to make him suffer for by inflicting suffering to Kitty?
But the devs gave the option. I did take the option to see the scene (before going back and chosing the other option) and I did find it hot.
But as Ragnar also said, Zaton's job is just to take the settlement. The General opposes that and therefore he must go. But while he does not appear to be an entirely pleasant person, to put it mildly, just stabbing him in the neck would also have solved the issue.
On a Macchiavellian level, does raping Kitty and brutally murdering the General give Zaton any future advantage? I don't really think so.
Last edited by a moderator: