- Apr 12, 2017
- 105
- 53
- Aug 8, 2017
- 1,014
- 3,703
Photo #1 can be found under Courtney's bed after she has given you a BJ in the evening.
But I think this is still bugged, because it also did not appear for me.
I opened the console and typed the following command to make them appear:
> c_photos_1 = 1
- Jun 5, 2018
- 802
- 1,220
- Jun 16, 2017
- 180
- 256
What I am trying to pull? I'm telling you guys how it is so you can make an informed decision.
Malwarebytes reacts when this executable tries to do something fishy with my computer. If this is due to bad coding, or malicious intent, i dont know.
even it does me, this happens when you finish the progress with the mother, after sleeping in her bed tells you that you have unlocked the scene of masturbation in the bathroom on her but then later does not let you ever enter the bathroom again
(Sorry my english )
- May 22, 2017
- 2,893
- 6,582
Well, thanks for the effort, but your information has just one source - your Malwarebytes. You also didn't mention where you downloaded the game from. So your "warning" was just way too poor to qualify for making that informed decision you're talking about. A lot more relevant information is needed for that.
Often this kind of short and poor messages are posted by trolls who do this just for fun or got pissed off by the dev for some reason and are trying to harm him in this childish way.
Well, so does my ESET AV. So do several other security products in the Virustotal's list of malware detectors.
I already figured that you really don't.
Well, maybe your FILF.exe actually does something fishy, I still don't know where you downloaded it, you didn't bother yourself to specify.
But you should also know my young padawan, that every malware detector screws up sometimes and flags something harmless as malicious. Especially those that are trying to be intelligent and trying to detect malware by its behavior.
Those screw-ups are called false positives. So when the security product you're using flags something as malicious that most likely shouldn't be, then it is imperative to check it with as many other similar products as well and only then make a decision about what to do next.
Calling it shit isn't an intelligent one, unfortunately.
Virustotal was made to find false positives the easy way.
I checked the Mega version of FILF.exe with ESET AV and uploaded it also to Virustotal.
Should you have bothered yourself enough to open the link I provided, you could have seen that even Malwarebytes does not detect it as malware, only 2 pretty much unknown products detect it as something fishy (but they are already known for flagging harmless stuff as malware) from the total of 67 various detectors (which include Malwarebytes, ESET, Kaspersky, F-Prot and other globally known high profile security products).
If there were a few well known good AV's with good heuristic analyzers in the list of malware warnings, I would be suspicious about it, but there literally are none.
I actually installed Malwarebytes trial version and scanned the file again - nothing. Clean.
Ran the game - still nothing.
File hash of the FILF.exe that I checked is:
MD5: 88CC6AC1D527AB2649DC884F6693C9E5
SHA-1: 267D4A3522129F97183D4078FFF5E22EB4A6747B
SHA-256: 98F660B789A6BA7D7F5739D62FFC6FE5602532249518005A530C30A4E3A150E2
If that hash doesn't match yours, then download the game again and from the Mega link this time.
You should also tell us where did you get the fake/infected one if you are really trying to be useful and are not just trolling.
- Jun 16, 2017
- 180
- 256
Your cocky attitude needs some work man.Well, thanks for the effort, but your information has just one source - your Malwarebytes. You also didn't mention where you downloaded the game from. So your "warning" was just way too poor to qualify for making that informed decision you're talking about. A lot more relevant information is needed for that.
Often this kind of short and poor messages are posted by trolls who do this just for fun or got pissed off by the dev for some reason and are trying to harm him in this childish way.
Well, so does my ESET AV. So do several other security products in the Virustotal's list of malware detectors.
I already figured that you really don't.
Well, maybe your FILF.exe actually does something fishy, I still don't know where you downloaded it, you didn't bother yourself to specify.
But you should also know my young padawan, that every malware detector screws up sometimes and flags something harmless as malicious. Especially those that are trying to be intelligent and trying to detect malware by its behavior.
Those screw-ups are called false positives. So when the security product you're using flags something as malicious that most likely shouldn't be, then it is imperative to check it with as many other similar products as well and only then make a decision about what to do next.
Calling it shit isn't an intelligent one, unfortunately.
Virustotal was made to find false positives the easy way.
I checked the Mega version of FILF.exe with ESET AV and uploaded it also to Virustotal.
Should you have bothered yourself enough to open the link I provided, you could have seen that even Malwarebytes does not detect it as malware, only 2 pretty much unknown products detect it as something fishy (but they are already known for flagging harmless stuff as malware) from the total of 67 various detectors (which include Malwarebytes, ESET, Kaspersky, F-Prot and other globally known high profile security products).
If there were a few well known good AV's with good heuristic analyzers in the list of malware warnings, I would be suspicious about it, but there literally are none.
I actually installed Malwarebytes trial version and scanned the file again - nothing. Clean.
Ran the game - still nothing.
File hash of the FILF.exe that I checked is:
MD5: 88CC6AC1D527AB2649DC884F6693C9E5
SHA-1: 267D4A3522129F97183D4078FFF5E22EB4A6747B
SHA-256: 98F660B789A6BA7D7F5739D62FFC6FE5602532249518005A530C30A4E3A150E2
If that hash doesn't match yours, then download the game again and from the Mega link this time.
You should also tell us where did you get the fake/infected one if you are really trying to be useful and are not just trolling.
The file was from MEGA and yes, I saw that Malwarebytes was in the list of engines on virustotal, but it doesnt specify what scans were run.
I doubt that the ransomware protection is included in the trial version, or perhaps the definition files was updated recently.
I dont have the files anymore so I can't check the hashes and checksums. Perhaps I'll try it again at a later date, but I'm done with this tread for now.
And hey, your info is great and accurate, but as I said, your attitude needs some work.
Peace!
- May 22, 2017
- 2,893
- 6,582
Ransomware protection and everything else included in the paid version is fully active in the trial version for the first 14 days, it was active while I scanned and ran the game file. Also, the database was the newest, it does update itself automatically, you know
. Also, the ransomware protection engine itself relies more on the behavior detection than any database.All of this raised my suspicion on your initial info.
Always, always keep your suspicious files to be checked later or sent to specialists. Just add some extension to the file to disable execution (suspicious-file.exe.disabled for example) and use an archiver to keep it from being deleted by your AV. :confounded:
My attitude was a direct consequence of your own. Next time check the mirror before blaming others.
I am actually very nice with the people who are nice themselves and I have been in fact a lot nicer and more informative to you than you have been or you deserve from the beginning of this discussion.
BTW, I have two ransomware detectors installed - one integrated into ESET AV, the other integrated into Acronis True Image. Neither had any problems with the running FILF.exe. I also have SuperAntiSpyware PE installed (real-time protection is disabled though, since ESET already covers it), that also has an integrated ransomware detector. It also had zero problems with FILF.exe.
There are already 3 confirmed ransomware detection engines against one that also failed to detect anything suspicious while I checked it. That's 4 negative detections by 4 different ransomware detectors against your initial claim.
"Intelligent" ransomware detection is a relatively new thing and far from being intelligent, there are lots of false positives to be expected. You should in fact send all suspicious files to Malwarebytes for further research, but I'm sure that this FILF.exe will come up clean.
I hope you learned something from it and that you will adjust your attitude yourself to deserve a better treatment next time. You can not expect to be treated respectfully having zero respect for others yourself.
I have been giving you the benefit of a doubt from the beginning, since so far you have zero evidence to prove your initial post being truthful: A single claimed detection from an engine that fails to detect anything now, initially no info about the file source, bad attitude from the beginning and now the original suspicious file "being deleted". In this light you really haven't deserved anything but suspicion. I'm not saying that you are a liar or a troll as I somewhat suspected initially, but no one has any actual reason to believe you so far.
- Jun 5, 2018
- 802
- 1,220
You do realize don't you that it is quite possible this Virus is on your computer in stealth mode and adds itself to any file you download which is why it doesn't matter what source you get the file from?
No virus reported on Kaspersky or Nortons here....