- Oct 10, 2021
- 41
- 36
A drug addict saying they want to enjoy the drugs they just consumed...yeah, totally normal and stable behavior.Right!!! It tells us that she was in her right mind all along.
A drug addict saying they want to enjoy the drugs they just consumed...yeah, totally normal and stable behavior.Right!!! It tells us that she was in her right mind all along.
If I made up a scenario in their past for arguments sake, let's say, Bryce saved her from being killed or something. Or provided her food or some other shit. Y'know, normal friend stuff that goes beyond him just being a drug dealer. Then that would indicate a higher level of trust with him. You wouldn't suspect a person like that to rape you.Yeah, I agree with that last part. For me she subconsciously wanted "closure" with Bryce, the guy she's had a crush on and is now moving away. And I'm not talking about a goodbye... There's no other reason for her to be there. She could meet everyone else at a different and way less "tempting" environment instead of a party in her drug dealer's house...
Well I knew that infidelity was considered a crime but I only heard of such cases in countries where law is massively influenced by religion,never heard of such laws in the US,I'm not from there and they never showed us any such cases in my law school.so thanks for telling me that,I'll look into it out of curiosity.I wholly agree with you, I just want to point out that there are jurisdictions even in the U.S., and around the world, were infidelity is considered a crime, that is why I decided to make that example. If you ever see or read a case in dose jurisdictions you will see it is a circus to say the least. A very complex topic indeed.
Mate, I will assume that you have read the thread and know that there are two camps. One says she was too drunk/high to know what she was doing, the other says she was not drunk/high enough to get away with it.A drug addict saying they want to enjoy the drugs they just consumed...yeah, totally normal and stable behavior.
The part about the rape has nothing to do with what I said. Your hypothetical scenario actually fits perfect with my theory. She went there especially for him, since like I said she could see everyone else in a less tempting environment, having in the back of her mind that it's her last chance to sleep with him.If I made up a scenario in their past for arguments sake, let's say, Bryce saved her from being killed or something. Or provided her food or some other shit. Y'know, normal friend stuff that goes beyond him just being a drug dealer. Then that would indicate a higher level of trust with him. You wouldn't suspect a person like that to rape you.
Where in the U.S. is infidelity considered a crime - especially between two people who are not married?This is an interesting topic, one that I have discussed in real life with some people. We can say that morally it is appalling for that to happen to a woman but on the topic of responsibility is when it all goes down the drain. If a woman is walking along and a man rapes her I agree that there is no responsibility on the woman, but if she knowingly puts herself in a position like Ava she has to carry with the responsibility too. I you will humor me consider this:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Think of Ava as an accessory or a conspirator. She already agreed to the fact but midway through the sequence of events she regrets her participation and bails out. In any other scenario that it is not related to rape she would be held responsible along with the perpetrator. Consider this example:
Instead of cheating they were going to rob the MC. Just before they grab MC's valuables she remembers that she likes the MC so she tries to run out the door but Bryce being his usual self grabs her and beats her and knocks her out. When the police catches and arrest both of them, she will argue that she did not actually grabbed any valuable and she was knocked out. Tough luck she will never the less be charged with the crime.
Now we as members of society agree to make the exception in regards to rape because we like to protect our women. It is a measure that oversteps the boundaries of legal system, the morals of the society and the ethics of people with the sole purpose of guaranteeing that the fair sex is protected. But it should or does not magically erase any responsibility a woman might have in the events.
To reiterate, there is a difference between being a victim and playing Russian roulette.
I thought I wouldn't need to clarify this, but my point was that she probably trusted him and looked at him as a friend. She said she missed natasha and sarah, and she didn't like bryce like that so I can only assume she still had a level of respect for him due to their past. But if you want to look at it differently, then that's alright.The part about the rape has nothing to do with what I said. Your hypothetical scenario actually fits perfect with my theory. She went there especially for him, since like I said she could see everyone else in a less tempting environment, having in the back of her mind that it's her last chance to sleep with him.
Where in the game do you see proof of this? Can you point it out please?She went there especially for him, since like I said she could see everyone else in a less tempting environment, having in the back of her mind that it's her last chance to sleep with him.
Where in the U.S. is infidelity considered a crime - especially between two people who are not married?
I'm no lawyer but even in divorce court, infidelity has little bearing unless there is a prenuptial agreement.
I actually looked into it,Where in the U.S. is infidelity considered a crime - especially between two people who are not married?
I'm no lawyer but even in divorce court, infidelity has little bearing unless there is a prenuptial agreement.
It's right after that point where you got a sentence of my comment out of context conveniently leaving out the part where I said that's my theory.Where in the game do you see proof of this? Can you point it out please?
I mean, in the words of Stu from the hangover, "I'm sorry the drug dealer from the liquor store wasn't a straight shooter."I thought I wouldn't need to clarify this, but my point was that she probably trusted him and looked at him as a friend. She said she missed natasha and sarah, and she didn't like bryce like that so I can only assume she still had a level of respect for him due to their past. But if you want to look at it differently, then that's alright.
Taken from one of Canto Forte posts.Where in the game do you see proof of this? Can you point it out please?
Fuck I ran out of reactions. I think you might be on to something there.I mean, in the words of Stu from the hangover, "I'm sorry the drug dealer from the liquor store wasn't a straight shooter."
The fact that she trusted this ass, as well as all the other pricks who bullied the mc for years enough to party with them shows she wasn't bright. She should have ended all contact if she was serious about both the mc and staying sober.
She had enough baggage getting clean from drugs. She had much more when she was raped. Given the confession she gave she's probably got a mountain more now.
I think the Dev's goal was to make us hate her, then realize she wasn't in the wrong and have sympathy for her. But to guys like me... she 100% was. I assume the next arc was foreshadowed by her confession. I'm guessing there was Bryce whoring her and feeding her drugs then throwing her away when he won the lotto. I don't think there's a reason to have her redeemed. She's already dead to most of us anyway.
Idk why Annie is on her side right now, she could've been making everything up.
We're probably getting into a topic that will get these comments deleted, but thanks for the link.You must be registered to see the links
Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
I am not sure how it applies to common law marriage (not real marriage) in the U.S. but it does apply in other countries.
Trusting him as a friend has nothing to do with her staying at a party where everyone is drinking and doing drugs, while she's been clean for a while and supposedly wants to stay that way. That's why I said I believe she still wanted to bang him. Maybe subconsciously, maybe not, but like I said, I don't see any other reasons for her to risk her newly found sobriety. She could stay there for a few minutes, say her goodbyes, plan something with Natasha and Sarah if she missed them so much and leave. Hell, she could even drink a beer with them before leaving if she felt strong enough. ONE beer though, not a couple because "they won't hurt".I thought I wouldn't need to clarify this, but my point was that she probably trusted him and looked at him as a friend. She said she missed natasha and sarah, and she didn't like bryce like that so I can only assume she still had a level of respect for him due to their past. But if you want to look at it differently, then that's alright.
And how is this a declaration that she is going there to cheat?View attachment 1453030 Taken from one of Canto Forte posts.
I believe she's going to the party for bryce and sarah and natasha.And how is this a declaration that she is going there to cheat?
Here is the actual dialog:
mc "So, you’re going to that party tonight right?"
av "Yeah, Bryce is going to leave soon so I thought I might as well go. Final goodbyes and all that."
mc "I heard Natasha and Sarah are going to be there too."
av "Yeah…Is it bad that I kinda miss them?"
mc "No, of course not. Just remember to not go overboard."
av "Obviously."
mc "Good. I love you."
av "I love you too, dork."
"{i}You and Ava go in for a quick embrace.{i}"
mc "Stay safe, and don’t stay up too late."
av "Yeah yeah, {b}dad{/b}."
On people's accusation that she hid the fact that she was going, where exactly is that here?
So here is an impasse that stems from two different ways of judging people. At least that is how I see it.And how is this a declaration that she is going there to cheat?
Here is the actual dialog:
mc "So, you’re going to that party tonight right?"
av "Yeah, Bryce is going to leave soon so I thought I might as well go. Final goodbyes and all that."
mc "I heard Natasha and Sarah are going to be there too."
av "Yeah…Is it bad that I kinda miss them?"
mc "No, of course not. Just remember to not go overboard."
av "Obviously."
mc "Good. I love you."
av "I love you too, dork."
"{i}You and Ava go in for a quick embrace.{i}"
mc "Stay safe, and don’t stay up too late."
av "Yeah yeah, {b}dad{/b}."
In a court of law here in the U.S, you are innocent until proven guilty. If the state can't prove their case with evidence, the verdict comes down as not-guilty. In this case, Ava would be found to be not guilty of cheating. "She must have thought this" is not evidence.So here is an impasse that stems from two different ways of judging people. At least that is how I see it.
If we see Ava as a goal-directed adult we immediately assume that what she first said, "Yeah, Bryce is going to leave soon so I thought I might as well go. Final goodbyes and all that." is her true goal and the rest is a way of buttering up the situation with the MC. It is like sayin I intend to do A but hey I also intend to do B, it is a negotiation. It may sound like a sociopathic way of seeing things but remember that rhetoric and manipulation are the same thing just with different connotations. Consider this:
- On one hand there are the users like you that see Ava reacting to the cues of the scene as best she can. I may be wrong, if I am please point it out.
- On the other hand there are users like me that see Ava acting as a goal-directed adult.
It is not necessary to read all of it because it delves into the technical side of things but the introduction describes what "Goal-Directed Behavior" is.
You must be registered to see the links
It tells us that we as humans plan ahead, even if we say we do not we always have some sort of expectation. I do not know if you read a post I made a few days ago in which I argued that if I am invited to a party with a discrete set of variables, I need to have an outlined goal of what my expectations of fun in that environment are. So the argument is that she already had a plan and that plan was going as it should until she felt the guilt of cheating. The alternative is that she is so stupid that she would need to be considered borderline retarded.