But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.
We all like cream pies. But creampies are different.
Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
- Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.
I got my information from the very same place you did Walter. But I see you have to misrepresent what I said so you can make your argument. Lets take my quote:
Uhh, no, even under the current definition the pregnancy part of the tag would only apply to a woman who is showing.
Now, the key phrase I used that should show I understood the "or" part of that sentence is "the pregnancy PART OF THE TAG". That implies that there's another part to the tag, but that I was referring to that specific part of said tag. And again, in order for it to be counted as pregnancy the woman has to be visibly PREGNANT! She can't just say "I'm pregnant"; or they can't show a positive pregnancy test and then engage in sex. She has to have the preggo belly in order for it to count as pregnancy!
And again, I've already pointed out in my previous post that yes, insemination currently falls under the pregnancy tag. So please stop misrepresenting what I'm saying.
I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?
No, your posts keep proving you don't understand the fetish, as you're trying to say "Well they say they're pregnant, so it's pregnancy sex!" Again, if you were to go to a porn site, like Pornhub, and look up pregnancy, you're not going to get women who say their pregnant but lack the preggo belly. You're going to get women with the preggo belly.
And where did I say that the tag rules weren't met Walter? Why do you keep misrepresenting what I said? You know, where I already stated in my first comment to you that Whiteleaf is following the tag rules.
Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?
Yeah, except I sorta disproved that when I linked to their
comment in Dawn of Malice where they stated that PREGNANCY was coming soon, but that there was a lot of insemination talk already. But if you want another comment,
here, Whiteleaf is pretty much admitting that yes, there will be pregnancy content in the future. So the dev clearly shows they were planning to add pregnancy content in the original game.
This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.
I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
The only thing I'm disappointed in right now is you Walter. You're entire post here henges on you misrpresenting what I've said. I have already stated in my first post to you that Whiteleaf didn't break the tag rules. So yeah, stop misrepresenting my comments to fit the false narrative you're constructing here.
Also, the one who gave those expectations was Whiteleaf. So yeah, they're at fault. As the above comments shows they were going to have pregnancy content in some form in Dawn of Malice. Most of us who played Family Breeding were originally playing DoM first, so when Whiteleaf stated they were going to "finish" the game in FB using the same assets, it's pretty obvious that people were fully expecting them to "finish" the content they were planning to put into DoM as well.
But Whiteleaf can do whatever they want with their game. It's their game afterall. But that doesn't mean people can't voice their dissatisfaction with how the game turned out.