Walter Victor

Forum Fanatic
Dec 27, 2017
5,963
20,325
Dude, I wasn't talking to you but seeing your response to these points I made. Shows you don't get the pregnancy belly fetish. To you, this means nothing, so what you said is the 'logical' response.
Dude, this is a public forum. If you want to converse privately, use the PM function.

Oh, I understand the sex-with-pregnant-women-who-are-obviously-showing fetish just fine. [Maybe that's the title of a tag that would help.] And I certainly hope I am being logical. That is my intention.
Yeah and that one last render was lazy. If its about breeding then just dont add that last image. Its a insult in my opnion.
It's only an insult because you expected something else - something the developer never wanted or intended to give you.
Im always here for the moms dude.
And I prefer the younger girls. Different subjective opinions. No problem.
Saying my opnion is illigal it seems.
You may express your opinion all you want, as long as you realize that the developer might have a different idea about what his game was supposed to be. It is his game after all, not yours.
Euh no? A lot of harem games just have harem as one option not the only option.
As long as you don't mind that "Harem endings have become a lazy way to end games.", it makes no difference to me which games you play. :ROFLMAO:
 

Walter Victor

Forum Fanatic
Dec 27, 2017
5,963
20,325
... Walter, the tags are for FETISHES/KINKS. One doesn't need to be experienced viewers of Pornhub to understand that the tags on games isn't for the literal definition of the word being used. If we were to use the literal definition than there should be a lot of games with cream pies in them.
But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.
Uhh, no, even under the current definition the pregnancy part of the tag would only apply to a woman who is showing.
Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
  • Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.
Again, the fetish of pregnancy sex is a visibly pregnant woman engaging in sexual actions. It can't just be implied; or even a positive test and the woman engages in sexual acts afterwards. The woman has to be visibly pregnant for it to be considered pregnancy sex.
I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?

Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?

This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.

I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
 

Wlms

Active Member
Apr 17, 2021
982
1,575
As much as I'm disappointed by the absence of preggo sex, I can at least get peak entertainment from the non-stop heated and.... passionate argument you guys are having.

5/5, top tier experience, keep it going lads ! :LUL:
 

puddinbutt

Newbie
Apr 20, 2023
26
10
But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.

Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
  • Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.

I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?

Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?

This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.

I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.
 

Walter Victor

Forum Fanatic
Dec 27, 2017
5,963
20,325
nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.
That's what YOU and others want, but do NOT pretend that you speak for "people". You do NOT speak for me, for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whisky Tango

Hampamatta

Newbie
May 15, 2023
70
225
Maybe there needs to be a "impregnation" tag in addition to "pregnancy" for devs to choose from?

there is plans to add a bunch of new tags such as impregnantion and specific incest roles (mother/son, brother/sister etc), but that announcement was well over a year ago and nothing have happened since. so dont hold your breath.

also instead of attack each other here. there is a very clear issue. and its neither players or developers fault. the planned tags are still not here and as far as i know its been put on the shelf. we should focus our anger towards the one thing that can actually clear up all these misunderstandings. release the damn tags man... its been over a year and nothing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Highland_Hunter

Hampamatta

Newbie
May 15, 2023
70
225
nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.
exactly, if the pregnancy is only implied and nothing ever even showed. then whats the point? whats the diffrence between that and just regular creampie?
 

Turkis

Member
Jul 17, 2017
278
597
But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.
We all like cream pies. But creampies are different.

Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
  • Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.
I got my information from the very same place you did Walter. But I see you have to misrepresent what I said so you can make your argument. Lets take my quote:

Uhh, no, even under the current definition the pregnancy part of the tag would only apply to a woman who is showing.
Now, the key phrase I used that should show I understood the "or" part of that sentence is "the pregnancy PART OF THE TAG". That implies that there's another part to the tag, but that I was referring to that specific part of said tag. And again, in order for it to be counted as pregnancy the woman has to be visibly PREGNANT! She can't just say "I'm pregnant"; or they can't show a positive pregnancy test and then engage in sex. She has to have the preggo belly in order for it to count as pregnancy!

And again, I've already pointed out in my previous post that yes, insemination currently falls under the pregnancy tag. So please stop misrepresenting what I'm saying.

I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?
No, your posts keep proving you don't understand the fetish, as you're trying to say "Well they say they're pregnant, so it's pregnancy sex!" Again, if you were to go to a porn site, like Pornhub, and look up pregnancy, you're not going to get women who say their pregnant but lack the preggo belly. You're going to get women with the preggo belly.

And where did I say that the tag rules weren't met Walter? Why do you keep misrepresenting what I said? You know, where I already stated in my first comment to you that Whiteleaf is following the tag rules.

Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?
Yeah, except I sorta disproved that when I linked to their comment in Dawn of Malice where they stated that PREGNANCY was coming soon, but that there was a lot of insemination talk already. But if you want another comment, here, Whiteleaf is pretty much admitting that yes, there will be pregnancy content in the future. So the dev clearly shows they were planning to add pregnancy content in the original game.

This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.

I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
The only thing I'm disappointed in right now is you Walter. You're entire post here henges on you misrpresenting what I've said. I have already stated in my first post to you that Whiteleaf didn't break the tag rules. So yeah, stop misrepresenting my comments to fit the false narrative you're constructing here.

Also, the one who gave those expectations was Whiteleaf. So yeah, they're at fault. As the above comments shows they were going to have pregnancy content in some form in Dawn of Malice. Most of us who played Family Breeding were originally playing DoM first, so when Whiteleaf stated they were going to "finish" the game in FB using the same assets, it's pretty obvious that people were fully expecting them to "finish" the content they were planning to put into DoM as well.

But Whiteleaf can do whatever they want with their game. It's their game afterall. But that doesn't mean people can't voice their dissatisfaction with how the game turned out.
 

harem.king

Engaged Member
Aug 16, 2023
3,209
5,380
exactly, if the pregnancy is only implied and nothing ever even showed. then whats the point?
The emotional satisfaction of impregnating your waifu. Which is immense and a huge aspect of the fetish.
Granted, having the pregnant belly is even better. Having pregnant sex even better still (only if she is pregnant with your child. otherwise it disgusts me)
But regardless even if all I get is being told "darling I am pregnant" and no visible pregnancy I still immensely enjoy it.
 

puddinbutt

Newbie
Apr 20, 2023
26
10
The emotional satisfaction of impregnating your waifu. Which is immense and a huge aspect of the fetish.
Granted, having the pregnant belly is even better. Having pregnant sex even better still (only if she is pregnant with your child. otherwise it disgusts me)
But regardless even if all I get is being told "darling I am pregnant" and no visible pregnancy I still immensely enjoy it.
sure that's a fair point but ya wanna SEE the fruits of your labor, not just get told. its satisfying but like... idk man
 

JuanokuG4

Member
Dec 26, 2018
140
123
1727932240117.png

I sure do love using manipulation tactics
I know getting on a high horse on an incest porn game is kinda dumb but it's like movies, you get one weird thing for me to ignore. with porn it's one red flag i'm willing to look over, this just makes me feel like a douchebag for even entertaining the idea of playing this
 
3.40 star(s) 21 Votes