here is my android port of Family Breeding [Final]
You must be registered to see the links
-
You must be registered to see the links
Dude, this is a public forum. If you want to converse privately, use the PM function.Dude, I wasn't talking to you but seeing your response to these points I made. Shows you don't get the pregnancy belly fetish. To you, this means nothing, so what you said is the 'logical' response.
It's only an insult because you expected something else - something the developer never wanted or intended to give you.Yeah and that one last render was lazy. If its about breeding then just dont add that last image. Its a insult in my opnion.
And I prefer the younger girls. Different subjective opinions. No problem.Im always here for the moms dude.
You may express your opinion all you want, as long as you realize that the developer might have a different idea about what his game was supposed to be. It is his game after all, not yours.Saying my opnion is illigal it seems.
As long as you don't mind that "Harem endings have become a lazy way to end games.", it makes no difference to me which games you play.Euh no? A lot of harem games just have harem as one option not the only option.
But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.... Walter, the tags are for FETISHES/KINKS. One doesn't need to be experienced viewers of Pornhub to understand that the tags on games isn't for the literal definition of the word being used. If we were to use the literal definition than there should be a lot of games with cream pies in them.
Where do you get your information?Uhh, no, even under the current definition the pregnancy part of the tag would only apply to a woman who is showing.
I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?Again, the fetish of pregnancy sex is a visibly pregnant woman engaging in sexual actions. It can't just be implied; or even a positive test and the woman engages in sexual acts afterwards. The woman has to be visibly pregnant for it to be considered pregnancy sex.
nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.
Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.
- Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?
Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?
This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.
I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
That's what YOU and others want, but do NOT pretend that you speak for "people". You do NOT speak for me, for example.nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.
Maybe there needs to be a "impregnation" tag in addition to "pregnancy" for devs to choose from?
exactly, if the pregnancy is only implied and nothing ever even showed. then whats the point? whats the diffrence between that and just regular creampie?nah we want belly stuff, that's what we're here for m8 if we wanted the implication that theyre pregnant then we'd just pretend they are when they clearly arent showing but thats not why people who look for the pregnancy tag are here. simpo as.
We all like cream pies. But creampies are different.But, I like cream pies, regardless of how you define them.
I got my information from the very same place you did Walter. But I see you have to misrepresent what I said so you can make your argument. Lets take my quote:Where do you get your information?
https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-09-15.10394/
The "or" in the middle of that rule should not have to be explained. Not to mention that there actually was sex with pregnant women, just not the kind you wanted.
- Pregnancy [The act of impregnating a woman or having sex with a pregnant one.]
Now, the key phrase I used that should show I understood the "or" part of that sentence is "the pregnancy PART OF THE TAG". That implies that there's another part to the tag, but that I was referring to that specific part of said tag. And again, in order for it to be counted as pregnancy the woman has to be visibly PREGNANT! She can't just say "I'm pregnant"; or they can't show a positive pregnancy test and then engage in sex. She has to have the preggo belly in order for it to count as pregnancy!Uhh, no, even under the current definition the pregnancy part of the tag would only apply to a woman who is showing.
No, your posts keep proving you don't understand the fetish, as you're trying to say "Well they say they're pregnant, so it's pregnancy sex!" Again, if you were to go to a porn site, like Pornhub, and look up pregnancy, you're not going to get women who say their pregnant but lack the preggo belly. You're going to get women with the preggo belly.I well understand the fetish. That isn't the point. The point is that the forum tag rules were met. Your expectations were not, but whose fault is that?
Yeah, except I sorta disproved that when I linked to their comment in Dawn of Malice where they stated that PREGNANCY was coming soon, but that there was a lot of insemination talk already. But if you want another comment, here, Whiteleaf is pretty much admitting that yes, there will be pregnancy content in the future. So the dev clearly shows they were planning to add pregnancy content in the original game.Another point is that the developer never intended to show sex with girls who were showing. Did he ever say otherwise? Did you ask him?
The only thing I'm disappointed in right now is you Walter. You're entire post here henges on you misrpresenting what I've said. I have already stated in my first post to you that Whiteleaf didn't break the tag rules. So yeah, stop misrepresenting my comments to fit the false narrative you're constructing here.This is all about expectations. But who gave you those expectations. If you were relying on the tag rules, then you didn't understand those rules, because they are pretty self-explanatory.
I don't know what to tell you. You were disappointed. But I still don't think that's the developer's fault. He has faults, but that wasn't one of them.
The emotional satisfaction of impregnating your waifu. Which is immense and a huge aspect of the fetish.exactly, if the pregnancy is only implied and nothing ever even showed. then whats the point?
sure that's a fair point but ya wanna SEE the fruits of your labor, not just get told. its satisfying but like... idk manThe emotional satisfaction of impregnating your waifu. Which is immense and a huge aspect of the fetish.
Granted, having the pregnant belly is even better. Having pregnant sex even better still (only if she is pregnant with your child. otherwise it disgusts me)
But regardless even if all I get is being told "darling I am pregnant" and no visible pregnancy I still immensely enjoy it.
well, yes. it is even better if you get to see the baby bump. and then to have pregnant sex.sure that's a fair point but ya wanna SEE the fruits of your labor, not just get told. its satisfying but like... idk man