- Dec 21, 2020
- 207
- 197
This will be finished about the same time as Star Citizen....but at least some progress is made....see ya all in 10 years when story moves from Bangkok
Arguing that if you disagree, try to make it better yourself doesn't mean people cannot be upset with a product or project. People will continue to voice their opinion regardless of whether they paid for it or not. People still give Tesla shit for the fact that they don't adopt a standard charger, but does that mean they should go and create their own e-vehicle environmental tax credit company? The issue with crab is less scam and more or less they cannot learn to test this ahead of time before trying to implement it, resulting in redoing the entire project from the ground up every time they can't scratch that itch.So many people having a big ol' boner with trashing creators projects and rythm and throwing the "scam" argument left right and center...
How about, if you hate it so much, you start making your own game and wait for other to do that to you, hm ?
I cannot say much about the passion, but what I can say is that he really needs to get a manager. Or at least someone who can get him to learn when to cut something out if it's not necessary to the core loop.Partially I think, Crush certainly reads the feedback and is clearly aware his fans all want slightly different things. Crush has a real passion for the open world/sandbox elements, immersion and the UI.
It's not removed, this is a standalone version of what will follow that part.Where is the birth to college part?removed?
So should I make a 1.11 save and load it in 1.13?It's not removed, this is a standalone version of what will follow that part.
And yet what comes back the most is "the creator is scamming people" whenever someone doesnt' get what they want fast enough. Weird huh ? It's literally the argument that comes out the fastest whenever a dev isn't quick enough about the updates or starts a project over. Yeah people hate to see something going back to scratch. Yet, more often than not, the newer version gets drastic improvments thanks to the creator having more experience.Arguing that if you disagree, try to make it better yourself doesn't mean people cannot be upset with a product or project. People will continue to voice their opinion regardless of whether they paid for it or not. People still give Tesla shit for the fact that they don't adopt a standard charger, but does that mean they should go and create their own e-vehicle environmental tax credit company? The issue with crab is less scam and more or less they cannot learn to test this ahead of time before trying to implement it, resulting in redoing the entire project from the ground up every time they can't scratch that itch.
Grand advice. Everyone who has ever criticized a game, make your own game first. That way, we have only game creators and nobody else. I do actually make my own games, by the way, and so I do know what I am talking about.So many people having a big ol' boner with trashing creators projects and rythm and throwing the "scam" argument left right and center...
How about, if you hate it so much, you start making your own game and wait for other to do that to you, hm ?
Many of them have done far more than Crush has done, and make much less than a small fraction of what Crush makes. That is what makes it interesting. Crush is doing no more than the people that you criticized, but makes vastly more. That is what makes Crush remarkable. Never the game, always the marketing.If you want crappy, scammy games, there's a bunch of HTML games, all resembling one another, getting one update every 6 months that comes down to two pages of text and a broken link.
Now you're gonna probably say that people pay for this game that gets restarted over and over. Yes. And if they're still paying, that means they, too, understand that ultimately, the new version will have various improvments over the previous one.
Ultimately, it's his game, he makes it however he wants. People are free to support him or not, to their liking. But accusing him of scamming people while he actually works and makes updates...
You have other devs making shitty non-finished games that are barely a 0.01 and immediatly promote a Patreon with barely and intro done, and nobody bats an eye.
Those are scammy people.
No idea why you wanted to write so much but all I said was that they were entitled to their opinions and will just criticize the game as they please. I did state in another comment that the issue is that the dev needs to learn to test and toss things out as soon as possible rather than attempting to spend a lot of work on it then scrap it months later.snip
Currently it's being shelved while they work on something else. They removed it so it's easier to get to the newer content.Where is the birth to college part?removed?
May I steal that meme?
Patreon isn't really a platform to support projects or to get a product out of it. You are basically throwing money at a creator to make more of what they already do. That's the issue with making a game on patreon is that there is no incentive to actually complete it. It's not like Scishow or supporting a creator like Corridor Digital which creates a finished product each time for the subscribers.snip