I don't fully understand what you wrote, but answering your first question:
I'm not afraid to: 1) ask loaded questions; 2) write in a supremely autistic way, so my condolences.
Well, in our western misogynistic culture if a guy cheats on a woman, that is seen as a macho thing, its celebrated, its "a harem" on this site (the guy MC basically cheats on all the girls in the harem no?), on the other hand if a woman cheats on the male, then she is seen as a whore, maybe as a gold-digger, a slut, and any other demeaning attribute you can think of.
1. I'm not sure we're talking about the same Western culture. Afaik, when Dr. Disrespect cheated on his wife, he got booed off Twitch by all the simps in the world.
2. Are you sure it's the Westerners and not the... non-Westerners? The Westerners are the most feminist culture in the history of this planet, you can't possibly accuse them of "misogyny". This is the ceiling. If anything, you should blame the Japanese and... other races, although I'm not sure what percentage of consumers of pornographic games are non-Americans.
3. Harem is: 1) Japanese-derived; 2) a male fantasy.
This is indeed fascinating. As far as I understand, the consumers of hentai games do seem more unhinged than your typical American netizen. Far closer to what I've heard of other cultures. This is why I think these people are non-Americans. And another point - these folks seem to hold strong views pertaining to the genres of pornography, i.e., femdom is discouraged, and male supremacy fantasies are quite hardcore. Are you arguing that these fantasies should not exist? Or that people should not defend their fetishes (mind you, defending and attacking are inseparable, I fully expect maledom-lovers to harass the femdom-folks, it's a constant struggle).
Conversely, I never see misogyny on the SFW Western Internet. Never. This is the most hilarious point. Because I have been looking for it. And it breaks my heart whenever I see such vicious attacks on the mildest femdom either on f95zone or on nhentai because I know these people are simps IRL.
The woman who is cheated on by a male is seen as a "whore" again, nothing special, "just another idiot bimbo, like all women",
That's what you get when free love triumphs - I don't exactly care about inherent misogyny ("fairness"), what I miss is the strong family unit which once was the strength of such traditional societies as the USSR. Nobody should fuck around.
just fitting the gender stereotype of weak femininity - in fact she would be chastised if she were to stand up for herself (that would break the meek and weak element of femininity as construed), that would be too "manly" of her.
The irony is that any case of real-life female supremacy is built upon the weakness of men. This is why I take great pains for me to separate sexual femdom and societal role reversal. Normies constantly confuse them, to nobody's advantage.
(notice all the negative traits put into femininity when it comes to internal "qualities" - it is also worth noting here, that homophobia is also partially due to misogyny: as a sense of crisis of the hetero-normative manly manhood image one is forced to see abandoned).
What's wrong with being strong? It's only the Christian Americans/Europeans, alone in the world, who find this masochistic (in a non-constructive way) pleasure in self-flagellation. Life is a struggle, losers should be: 1) helped; 2) mocked; 3) sent to the camps.
If a woman cheats she is "loose", if a man cheats, he is a "boss player". Notice the double standard?
Only in the care-free bourgeois societies of the Neochristian West where the sexual debauchery of the chads is celebrated, where people don't know hardship, where there is no sense of identity other than a competition to be perceived as the weakest. My response to bourgeois feminism stems from the wider worldview of history and geography - these questions will be resolved when a more sustainable civilisation takes the throne of Washington.
If a woman has a "harem" of male suitors, and one of those males is the MC you are supposed to identify with, and you are a typical male, then that will not seem to you cool at all, you would rebel against it, and in order to prove how real of a man you are, you will have two options: call the female a "whore" and distance yourself from the weak betrayer of "manliness" with utter horror.
So what is the target of your critique? That the majority of the consumers are male? I'm quite sure, from the female PoV, these traditional "harem" games would be unattractive - but said females lack the voice because they do not exist (virtually).
Classic patriarchal misoginistic perspective sees all women as "beta" when compared to males, but it hates even more the males who submit to females, whether by NTR meekness, "gayness" or submission, because they are seen as a THREAT to the idea that all males are dominant, just as dominant females represent a threat to the idea that all females are submissive. Heck, this narrative is so strong, that even actually gay males are seen as playing a "woman's role". This all adds up nicely, gay males, submissive males, or males who endure and accept being cheated on and still "cling" to their woman, all are seen as "defective males", males who failed at being what "men are supposed to be". Similarly, women who don't lay down to the whims of men, lesbians who don't care for men, dominant females, etc are seen as defective women. "Simps" and "Karens" you see.
Now this is interesting! I wonder what you mean by "seen as a threat" - seen by whom and when? A spineless male who allows his wife to run the household is a threat to... his male mates? Maybe, you're right. But nothing of this exists anymore. The USSR fell. Now, there are only chads > women >>> all non-chads , reduced to betas and incels.
As most of this feminist theory, it seems misdirected and outdated. Now, if anyone has to rise up, it is the incel gamers against the chad bourgeoisie. For truthfully I'm telling you now, female nature has been demonstrated as inadequate in this great Christian/secular feminist experiment.
That's why - as far as I understood your comment - even you are seeing it from the classic male-centric pov when you say that the "cuck" is submitting to another male, rather than to the fancy and will of his woman, you like generally almost every male-socialized individual, you see the agency residing in the male, the woman in this triangle/equation is just a prop between a weak male (unworthy of being called a man) and a real man, the latter who takes charge of the weak male's woman.
1. I identify with the male because I'm male, and don't cross-dress. So much so that I have never appreciated lesbian content (with exceptions such as boot-licking). So much so that in pornography, I prefer censored JAVs because dicks are gay.
2. I do believe that if the hentai consumers seen here are Americans, and they are equating femdom with feminism (in an unfavourable light), then it could be derived from the reaction of the remaining male chauvinists against the triumph of feminism.
3. I myself lead a sheltered life and don't have to deal either with normies or the feminism in general, and I unironically view femdom as a patriarchal fetish. Even though I'm not a fan of the maxim "forbidden = arousing" (scat, incest, gay, lol), but I do retain this outdated view that men should dominate everything - but they also should obey Nature.
I hope, I won't get banerinoed, anything offensive stems from my metaphorically and proudly autistic being.
