Recommending Femdom Finder

[Mister_M]

A thing to note is that you may be able to dom men in that game but you won't be able to avoid them. There is no pure lesbian playthrough unlike their other game, Freepass.

Yes, you're right it's worth mentioning, though personally I don't mind it if I can play as a dom female.

 

[Aseratrix]

A thing to note is that you may be able to dom men in that game but you won't be able to avoid them. There is no pure lesbian playthrough unlike their other game, Freepass.

If you can play it as a female dominant then it qualifies 100%.

 

[Anonymous100]

If you can play it as a female dominant then it qualifies 100%.

Oh yeah, that wasn't to call into question whether it qualifies or not. That was more of a note that should be added since when playing as a female, some ppl like to avoid men and just stick to doming/subing to females.

 

[J1215]

https://f95zone.to/threads/algorithm-of-life-v0-01-janus-paradox.64224/

The game "Algorithm of life". (sci-fi, fantasy).
The game starts with an introduction, after which can choose a femdom path (femdom scenes). (soft-femdom)
The game was started but abandoned (for now).

 

[Etheric]

Boy, just played Bound by Lust and it was one the best Femdom I saw since a long time.
Not that forced BDMS for no reason but female teasers, it was very good seeing a character going from doing simple things in the start and become increasing domme as time passes.
Also it was very nice see that it may affect the side demon character

 

[Aseratrix]

I updated the OP with suggested corrections and added the few suggested games characterized sufficiently by others lately.

Three mentions:

1. the Fetish Variety column does not aim to enumerate all the fetishes a game contains, it is only supposed to present a relevant cross-section, especially if there are many fetishes, the optimal is to name the main/relevant ones.

2. Two suggested games are already in the list: Monkey Business and Second Girl's Happiness.

3. Games which only get mentioned, but are not detailed for the list will have to wait getting onto the list until someone gives me the necessary details or I get around to play them.

Thanks for all the contributions.

Ps: I intend to play some games soon with a view to add them to the list. This process may be slow, but I don't abandon the thread, no worries. However, the continued attacks in the threads of femdom-related games with unpopular fetishes and extreme content which I love dearly, have made me a bit disheartened about the site.

People are mostly intolerant assholes, kink-shaming especially the fetishes which are liked by only a minority of people, because its safe to gang up on those, such as scat, ntr and extreme femdom. I personally love femdom-scat and extreme femdom in general, and I am neutral about ntr. I extend my solidarity to all who enjoy unpopular fetishes.

 

[Ianuda]

Thanks for the continued work! It may be a silly question, but what is the difference between orgasm denial and chastity? (I'm actually surprised the tags apply this rarely, I guess, it's a testament to how cumming-focused many games are.) Although to be fair, slavery games such as Harshville which don't put the protagonist into cumming-inducing situations to begin with skirt this issue entirely.

 

[Aseratrix]

Thanks for the continued work! It may be a silly question, but what is the difference between orgasm denial and chastity? (I'm actually surprised the tags apply this rarely, I guess, it's a testament to how cumming-focused many games are.) Although to be fair, slavery games such as Harshville which don't put the protagonist into cumming-inducing situations to begin with skirt this issue entirely.

I can't speak for others, but my understanding [in a femdom context] is pretty simple:

chastity - it involves an instrument to block genitalia

orgasm denial - this is on a spectrum, it can be anything from edging up to a refusal by a dominant to grant sexual release by demand rather than a physical instrument such as in case of chastity

ps: some games such as Harshville, simply don't focus on this area, it basically lets the MC get off, but it doesn't care, basically basically it leaves it up to the player's fantasy what happens with his dick

 

[Innocience]

I can't speak for others, but my understanding [in a femdom context] is pretty simple:

chastity - it involves an instrument to block genitalia

orgasm denial - this is on a spectrum, it can be anything from edging up to a refusal by a dominant to grant sexual release by demand rather than a physical instrument such as in case of chastity

I second that definition and would like to add that chastity may also involve the complete absence of stimulation - the virtue of having no thoughts nor act on lustful desires. That does not necessarily need the involvement of a device.

 

[Jaike]

However, the continued attacks in the threads of femdom-related games with unpopular fetishes and extreme content which I love dearly, have made me a bit disheartened about the site.

Game threads with unpopular fetishes often are cesspits where intolerant arses run loose. Don't feel pressured to take more of that behaviour than you can stomach and spend time in better places on the forums. Did you have any particular topics in mind?

But know that there are many of us appreciate the work you put in.

 

[Aseratrix]

Game threads with unpopular fetishes often are cesspits where intolerant arses run loose. Don't feel pressured to take more of that behaviour than you can stomach and spend time in better places on the forums. Did you have any particular topics in mind?

But know that there are many of us appreciate the work you put in.

Thanks, but to be honest I could have not make it without the support of many. Mister_M in particular is responsible for a significant number of entries, for which I will always remain grateful, but so did help the suggestions of others.

As for those threads yeah, I need to loosen up and not take everything personally.

I don't really have any topic to raise right now, but its good to know that all of you react to posts happening here.

 

[Aseratrix]

I second that definition and would like to add that chastity may also involve the complete absence of stimulation - the virtue of having no thoughts nor act on lustful desires. That does not necessarily need the involvement of a device.

Yes. Originally "chastity" meant an attitude being indifferent towards your own sexual urges, or controlling your urges based on religious or moral convictions. It also has a historically nefarious meaning, since understood as instruments, it was first used by medieval nobles on their wives, so that while they are away in battle, their wives don't cheat on them. I guess NTR hate was alive and well in the medieval times as well, with a dose of misogyny on top.

 

[Mister_M]

So, the dev of Sexbot said - when I asked him/her about Sam - that every LI in the game will have a dom and sub routes, so there should be quite a lot of content. Wouldn't expect anything hard, judging from what's already in the game I guess we'll be in medium territory for most part.

Business as Usual is still tagged as having femdom, but the last updates removed any femdom content from the game (and there wasn't much of it to begin with). And while the prologue of the game is still ridiculous, 1st chapter is more focused, logical and has better writing. I don't really see the return of femdom to the game, but I intent to continue it for some time, so I'll write if anything will be added.

Regarding the chastity/orgasm denial imo in the current game/porn understanding chastity is where the male (as we talk here from the femdom perspective) is equipped with a chastity device, which makes him (or anyone else) unable to stroke his penis and have an erection; he can still be teased, smth can be inserted into his hole etc., but the arousal is impossible. Addtionally the device may have spikes inside so that any arousal will be additionally painful (works well with teasing obviously) and/or can be equipped with electro-torture device for his Mistress' amusement (She can electro-shock his penis and/or balls whenever She wishes*). But in some scenarios he can still orgasm from anal stimulation (or maybe hfo? Never tried it with any device, honestly don't know if it's possible). With denial the male is often edged, jerked, ordered to jerk off, but he is not allowed to cum/orgasm (usually by the order of his Mistress), so he's left in a (sexually) frustrated state. Of course the two can be and often are combined: long-term chastity -> chastity off -> orgasm denial (after teasing, giving him hope) -> back to chastity; that combo imo works quite well.

*I wish this idea would make appearance in more games: Mistress takes her sub equipped with electro-chastity to some dinner and while their eating/talking with people She randomly shocks his balls when he least expexts it. I had an idea for The Bully I Hate to have MC wear smth like that during lessons with his female bully controling the device. I think Karlsson's Gambit is the only game that makes a nice use of such a device.

 

[Ianuda]

But in some scenarios he can still orgasm from anal stimulation (or maybe hfo?

Heavy fuel oil? Ah, hands-free orgasm, Urban Dictionary to the rescue. You forgot vibrators, however. (It boggles my mind that anal orgasm is so rarely depicted in pornography. Although the recent DDFF-016 has come close.)

On another note, it's uplifting to see so many new games coming out in 2021! I have this weird defeatist attitude from RTS games that "everything good was in the past", but it doesn't seem to apply to femdom.

 

[Mister_M]

You forgot vibrators, however

You're right, good for teasing too.

 

[Jaike]

As for those threads yeah, I need to loosen up and not take everything personally.

I don't really have any topic to raise right now, but its good to know that all of you react to posts happening here.

Just give a shout if you need a little help in the defence of femdom. Sadly many have gendered double standards when it is about domination.

Yes. Originally "chastity" meant an attitude being indifferent towards your own sexual urges, or controlling your urges based on religious or moral convictions. It also has a historically nefarious meaning, since understood as instruments, it was first used by medieval nobles on their wives, so that while they are away in battle, their wives don't cheat on them. I guess NTR hate was alive and well in the medieval times as well, with a dose of misogyny on top.

Absolutely nothing mediaeval about hating adultery, most cultures had strict punishments for that, at least for women but sometimes also for men. Latin mediaeval law was actually rather mild compared to other societies, generally not allowing the death penalty. But I don't know how often the death penalty was enforced where it was on the books.

To be clear, chastity devices were never in use in the Middle Ages. They are an invention from the nineteenth century.

 

[TuffSub]

the continued attacks in the threads of femdom-related games with unpopular fetishes and extreme content which I love dearly, have made me a bit disheartened about the site.

I've abandoned some threads for this very reason.

People are mostly intolerant assholes, kink-shaming especially the fetishes which are liked by only a minority of people, because its safe to gang up on those, such as scat, ntr and extreme femdom. I personally love femdom-scat and extreme femdom in general, and I am neutral about ntr. I extend my solidarity to all who enjoy unpopular fetishes.

I'm sad to say that this is true of people in general, not just the subsection on this site. Feeling strong is very rewarding, especially to those who usually feel weak, and being a part of a group standing against "the others" is an easy way to feel comparatively strong. The human species still hasn't learned those lessons of WWII.
On the other hand, quite often, a few good people who are just there can make all the difference. Like most of those on this thread. I follow year example, Aseratrix, in extending my solidarity to all whose differences are used against them.

what is the difference between orgasm denial and chastity?

okay, some of my turn ons... for me these two belong to different aspects within BDSM.
Orgasm denial is an act of dominance, a subsection of orgasm control, on the DS aspect. The dominant takes something the submissive desires away, as part of the exchange of power between them. Of course, it is usually emphasized by teasing the submissive and by bringing them close to orgasm, as this increases the desirability of the orgasm for the sub.
Chastity is an act of discipline, on the BD aspect. The submissive has given up their rights to orgasm via stimulation of their genitals. This may be at the urging of the dominant, or at the initiative of the submissive. This may be assisted by bondage into a physical device, and the power to resume those rights may be given to the dominant (possibly as a key to the device), or it may be enforced by the sheer willpower of the sub. This may be an act of penance, of devotion, of how the physical urges stand between the submissive and their desires. Monks who take a vow of celibacy aim to be chaste.
The third aspect, SM, specifically when the submissive is male, would obviously be CBT.
Now, when a Domme binds her willing victim, removes the cage from his member, edges him repeatedly while using him for her own orgasms, ruins his orgasm, places his balls in a set of Kali's Teeth and his cock in a vice... excuse me, I seem to have lost my train of thought, and should probably clean up, but I think you get the picture

 

[Aseratrix]

I've abandoned some threads for this very reason.

I'm sad to say that this is true of people in general, not just the subsection on this site. Feeling strong is very rewarding, especially to those who usually feel weak, and being a part of a group standing against "the others" is an easy way to feel comparatively strong. The human species still hasn't learned those lessons of WWII.
On the other hand, quite often, a few good people who are just there can make all the difference. Like most of those on this thread. I follow year example, Aseratrix, in extending my solidarity to all whose differences are used against them.

okay, some of my turn ons... for me these two belong to different aspects within BDSM.
Orgasm denial is an act of dominance, a subsection of orgasm control, on the DS aspect. The dominant takes something the submissive desires away, as part of the exchange of power between them. Of course, it is usually emphasized by teasing the submissive and by bringing them close to orgasm, as this increases the desirability of the orgasm for the sub.
Chastity is an act of discipline, on the BD aspect. The submissive has given up their rights to orgasm via stimulation of their genitals. This may be at the urging of the dominant, or at the initiative of the submissive. This may be assisted by bondage into a physical device, and the power to resume those rights may be given to the dominant (possibly as a key to the device), or it may be enforced by the sheer willpower of the sub. This may be an act of penance, of devotion, of how the physical urges stand between the submissive and their desires. Monks who take a vow of celibacy aim to be chaste.
The third aspect, SM, specifically when the submissive is male, would obviously be CBT.
Now, when a Domme binds her willing victim, removes the cage from his member, edges him repeatedly while using him for her own orgasms, ruins his orgasm, places his balls in a set of Kali's Teeth and his cock in a vice... excuse me, I seem to have lost my train of thought, and should probably clean up, but I think you get the picture

Awesome replies, thanks!

 

[Aseratrix]

To be clear, chastity devices were never in use in the Middle Ages. They are an invention from the nineteenth century.

Thanks for the correction!

 

[ooeeoo]

You must be registered to see the links

They're definitely weird, but they'll probably appeal to people into socks/feet. There's nothing extreme though..