I just can't see how the MC could have deserved any of that since he's right and AmRose knows it. Does she want the sister to get blackmailed too? I'd have to legitimately question her mental capabilities at that point if I was MC. I can't wrap my mind around anything AmRose did being a decent idea.
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated bdsm big ass big tits creampie exhibitionism female domination futa/trans gay groping group sex handjob harem humiliation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game multiple penetration netorare oral sex pregnancy romance scat sex toys spanking stripping urination vaginal sex voyeurism
- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,481
- 20,252
Not really that hard to see this is almost the same situation as the one at the beach. The master and slave thing is their kink spiced with a bit of exhibitionism. A dom only goes as far as the sub allows it. Mike and AmRose are partners in this relationship and they know how to separate when they are in a sexual play from the rest of their lives.
And as i mentioned before the developer does like to go for some verisimilitude when depicting kinks in this game.
No he wasn't. He has been using the app for sexual satisfation left and right but somehow his adult sister can't? That is called hypocrisy.
Also AmRose was personally targeted and Mike got involved and became a target too, which makes a strong point for the blackmailer being someone close to them. So long as they don't speak about the issue with Stacy she will be okay just like the dozens, maybe more, of people who are using the fetish locator app.
Truth be told i believe they would raise more suspicion from Stacy if they tried to stop her from using the app while not saying why.
Last edited:
- Mar 3, 2020
- 1,962
- 4,179
i agree and some people said the MC only reacted like that because he wants to keep Stacy to himself, the way i see it hes trying to protect his sister from an app thats currently blackmailing him, AmRose and how many more people
Way to ignore the massive continuous characterisation to wave off just one example on a spurious excuse - her agreeing to let him be romantically involved with other girls despite her really not being happy with this is already way outside what you initially characterised as just submissive kink strictly limited to being exercised in bed.
Those arguments themselves are dogshit (you attribution of motive is speculative, your choice of what would be least suspicious is borderline bizarre, you completely evade that it would be worrying to the brother anyway, many other reasons), but even if they weren't then what Intubos said still applies - that the MC could very reasonably be expected to read it very differently to you and have a wildly different reaction to what his is railroaded on in game.
This port is not working on android 11. It still says that storage permission is not given but i have enabled it from settings.
The app says "your device cannot save the game progress through different weeks. Please allow FL to write on the external storage" and then it gives some instructions (believe for android) but how do I do this on mac?
I'm with Bailz on that quote. The issue for me isn't her having sexual encounters, mostly because I'm not interested in her. My issue is the blackmailing aspect, which is supposedly the main plot and something I'd want my sibling to help me avoid if I was thinking of signing up for it.
- Apr 8, 2020
- 1,768
- 2,068
You people might be wanting to protect her from the app but those were not the reason presented in the game the app part was minor and will probably be discussed once they don't have their phones on them, what was presented though was someone that didn't want their sister to have sex or explore her fetishes, did you guys actually read through the update or just skipped trough it? if the reason was the app I would be agreeing with yall but it isn't.
might be a noob question or maybe i didnt saw it while reading the post
just finished week 1 do i use the same save or something do i simply start over
or is this just a stupid question ???
much obliged
just finished week 1 do i use the same save or something do i simply start over
or is this just a stupid question ???
much obliged
The stated reason for the MC being concerned was not the app. Two reasons that the MC might have not explicitly stated concern about his sister being in significant danger of sexual blackmail:
1 - as you said, they had their phones on them and saying it out loud would be inadvisable
2 - bad writing
Unless you can present another good reason that the MC can't be upset about this situation on this account, the issue stands. The MC has completely valid reason to be concerned, gets completely bitched out by the setting's least plausible bitch over it, and has no dialogue option other than folding worse than wet cardboard on it.
Regardless, there are many other reasons to argue that R2's accusations of hypocrisy are tenuous at best, but rather than post a wall I'll stick with pointing out that you haven't actually refuted the claim on that particular point being dubiously conveyed in game.
- Sep 26, 2019
- 7,515
- 14,661
I personally don't care if Stacy is running a train with a sports team, nor do I care if she experiments with multiple partners. This vn will have ntr so it could be any of the ladies. That said I would do everything I could to avoid her getting blackmailed cause I actually care about her.
My issue is with AmRose and her not being a sex slave. I'm stuck with her and dislike her greatly so I was happy I could make her just a sex slave. Yet so far she really has just been her annoying self. It's a disappointment that's all.
Truly my only gripe about the vn.
My issue is with AmRose and her not being a sex slave. I'm stuck with her and dislike her greatly so I was happy I could make her just a sex slave. Yet so far she really has just been her annoying self. It's a disappointment that's all.
Truly my only gripe about the vn.
- Apr 8, 2020
- 1,768
- 2,068
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
AmRose didn't let her out of her sight by the way, although the MC wasn't wrong for being upset his reasoning wasn't good.
- Sep 26, 2019
- 7,515
- 14,661
When it comes to emotions does reasoning really come into play? Not in my world at least
None of that, however, is relevant to the point. So...
?
For the "AmRose didn't let her out of her sight", I'm afraid to say I literally don't even see what point you are trying to make. How is that relevant to the topic? The MC doesn't know that, and even if he did then it would not have a bearing on the subject in question, it in no way means he has no valid reason for concern about the situation (especially since AmRose is acting wildly out of character at that very moment).
For the "his resoning wasn't good" part, the very post you quoted from me is an adequate response to that.
- Apr 8, 2020
- 1,768
- 2,068
Yes, but my point never was that he didn't have valid reasons for concern but that AmRose had valid reasons to call him out as well, his concern after she said she got the app was still to make her leave, which woldn't happen because she is an "adult", so AmRose found the alternative to keep an eye on her and having the device, although that was a very weird experience since she could just have walked through the door you know circumstances and panic, after that his complaints about her being "out" of sight were based on pure sexism wich AmRose called out, now most of the discussion was about people saying that this was either out of character( wich I disagree on since AmRose has shown a strong personality multiple times), or that she shouldn't have called him out on the real reasons why he wanted her to keep an eye on his sister, it isn't because of the app it is because he doesn't want her to do sexual stuff because either he sees her as his little sister or because he wants her for himself(depending on the player until the dev decides) AmRose just calls him out on his hypocrisy and some people seem to not like that.
- Apr 8, 2020
- 53
- 95
- Sep 26, 2019
- 7,515
- 14,661
- Apr 8, 2020
- 53
- 95
- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,481
- 20,252
I saw on another game thread the same issue between android 11 and a ren'py game port permissions.
SEARCH THE THREAD!
Fair enough, although I did not think that was what the others had put into dispute. Yes there were reasons which could account for such a calling out to be made - although I will still insist on the distinction of saying that good writing would insist on it being presented roughly as is by another person from whom it would be in-character, or presented differently by AmRose in such a way that it was in character for her.
His stated complaints were something you interpreted as sexism, yes. Let's just go with that they were, for now. It still doesn't have any more impact than when you've brought it up several times before. I'll spare you the rudeness of posting the previous comment for a third time, but will reiterate - the MC at this point has valid reason to be in significant distress over the safety of his sister (we are indicated that this is, in fact, the case to at least some degree), a character completely unlikely to be a bitch in the situation completely bitches out on him over it, and his only response is to be cowed into submission by her cruelty even though this is also not really consistent with his own character depending on previous choice. This is bad writing.
She has shown a strong personality multiple times. It was out of character for her to do this. Personality is not just a sliding scale of strength or weakness, it is a matter of character and the character is off. She goes from almost pathologically agreeable and permissive to alpha bitch in 0 seconds flat. A devoted pacifist can have a strong personality, a warmongering dictator practically requires a strong personality, but it is out of character for a devoted pacifist to suddenly lead a coup and invade Poland - or vice versa, strength of personality not withstanding.
She shouldn't have called him out on it because he had (and she knew he had, yadda yadda) valid reasons for genuine distress over it that her character as established so far would have been considerate of rather than being confrontational to aggravate it. Again, returning to the above stated on what his actual motivations are and why that is beside the point...
I see a whole lot of people not liking that this was badly written. I don't see people upset that someone might call the MC a hypocrite. So, returning yet again...
If you just want a character to (/ are glad that a character has) call him a hypocrite for not wanting her to be as sexually adventurous as he is, fine. There are plenty of ways that that accusation could be leveled at him in the game in a well-written way. This ain't it, chief. The execution is poor whether it made a statement you like or not.