- Nov 18, 2018
- 427
- 461
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
You again? No hunny, the first page does NOT have the answer to my question! Because it says nothing about the Kate route, neither that there is something there nor that there isn't. I suppose you take THAT as the answer to my question, but the fact that it calls this update "the biggest" would imply for me that there may be also something on the Kate route. Coz the Lisa story alone (although very nice) is not soooo big in fact.
So is this update Max route only? That was my question.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
"All generalizations are false! ..And this is a generalization" (quote from Donald Rumsfeld
)Hi everyone!
i'm doing the Kate story and i'm stuck at the beginning of the "homework" story, but I can't start because I can't set the punishment rule where you are punished in the principal's room without underwear ... on the laptop it tells me that it cannot be activated in this version ... what should I do? help me ... thanks
i'm doing the Kate story and i'm stuck at the beginning of the "homework" story, but I can't start because I can't set the punishment rule where you are punished in the principal's room without underwear ... on the laptop it tells me that it cannot be activated in this version ... what should I do? help me ... thanks
- Nov 18, 2018
- 427
- 461
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Leave your fantasies to yourself and read what the game developer writes.
You are not playing the first update of the game. the game developer is releasing a new update for only one hero
We need a screenshot of the task of your quest. It will make it easier for people to help you.
Last edited:
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
1 - The fantasies WERE of myself.
2 - Since when can anybody take this dev's statements as granted and permanent?
I repeat: for an update called "the biggest" , this update is not big enough if it's only the content on the Max route. I asked in order to confirm that there is only Max this time, coz i can not really trust this dev. If all you can do in this situation is to consider me an idiot who doesn't read the OP, then please don't try to "help" me anymore in the future.
Start your own blog or something. We don't care what you think. We told you each update is for only one character.
You're the one asking questions. You wanted to know if the update was only for Max, we told you it was. In fact, after telling you the game has always exclusively updated one character at a time, you said we were generalizing. How many fucking brain cells do you have...
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
You were generalizing when you said "All updates have always been extending only one route." That is simply not true. NOT ALL and NOT ALWAYS! And I mean "you" as SINGULAR.
- Jun 16, 2017
- 7,265
- 8,043
One route for one character each month. The same for the other character the following month.
0.36 Max, 0.37 Kate.
Sure, the update ratio was 2 Kate:1 Max at one point but it's not the case any more.
What's so hard to follow about this?
0.36 Max, 0.37 Kate.
Sure, the update ratio was 2 Kate:1 Max at one point but it's not the case any more.
What's so hard to follow about this?
- Apr 24, 2020
- 6,706
- 10,979
Ok, so which update(s) updated both paths? I personally don't know of any, at least since I've been following the game.
In case your question has been misunderstood, if you are asking if any of the Kate content has been updated in the route where you play Max, then the answer is no. If you are asking if the Kate content has been updated in the route where you play Kate, the answer is also no.
Technically, there was an early update where two routes were extended in one update, but that was when the male character was Alex. Since the second MC became Max, and Alex was abandoned as a character, the updates have always been focused on only one route. If you don't believe me, you can go through the change logs:
You must be registered to see the links
As for the question of how they could say this is the biggest update ever, that seems to be what they always say, so you should take it with a grain of salt.
- Nov 18, 2018
- 427
- 461
Are you really that dumb or are you pretending?
The developer releases the update for only one main character. If there is a game update for Kate, then there is no new content for Max. Conversely, if a game update has been released for Max, then there is no content for Kate. What do you still not understand?
If you don't trust the game developer, don't play Glamour
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
Guys, you make me crazy.. Now really, since, as you say, it WAS ALREADY something else than 1 Max 1 Kate before, can you guys not understand that, at least theoretically, that MAY be the case again now or in the future? These things are not set in stone! I just asked, to make sure that it is still 1/1 and to not lose time playing when there is no new content on that route.
Why the fuck is it so difficult to just answer: "no Kate in this update" instead of filing pages of comments according to which I'm an idiot and you are all supermen. And of course i must answer that and then it goes on and on.. Stop that shit, please!
And to ANGEL KATE: Till now I refrained from calling you names whenever you called me names, out of sympathy for Kate Beckinsale who's picture you feature. But should you do that one more time, I will answer accordingly. And FYI: my trust in this developer is not related to the game itself but to his previous "announcements". That's not a reason to stop playing this game, which I like. If anybody should stop anything, that would be you stopping to tell me what I should or should not do. You may be a Domina, but I'm no fuckin' sub!
Last edited:
You asked if there was anything new for Kate in 0.36. You were told no, because it was a Max update and that means no new Kate content. You made the assertion that despite the changelog never mentioning anything for Kate, that there must be because of DS's use of (again) "biggest update", which is nothing short of either stupidity on your part, or deliberate trolling.
You were also told that updates focus on one of them each time, never both, which you disagreed with. The ratio of updates between Kate and Max is an entirely separate thing from what you asked and what you disagreed with.
The closest you can get to make an assertion that both received updates at the same time, was the change of engine, which is an extreme technicality that's only of use as trolling. Not for pedantry, just for trolling.
Rather appropriately, the change of engine was kind of trolling in itself. It was the next version that came immediately after one that was dedicated to bugfixes when it was Unity.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
OK .. you don't wanna stop.. we go on then ..
- you say: "You asked if there was anything new for Kate in 0.36. You were told no, because it was a Max update and that means no new Kate content."
That is exactly what I was NOT TOLD. If I was told "no" I would have had an answer and this whole discussion wouldn't be necessary. But I was NOT told "no" I was told to read the OP which I already did before and on the OP there is no sentence saying "there is no Kate content in this update". I could of course GUESS or "assume" that there is no Kate but I wanted to be sure in order to not lose time playing for content that doesn't exist. And that's why I asked.
- you say: "You made the assertion that despite the changelog never mentioning anything for Kate, that there must be because of DS's use of (again) "biggest update"
Not mentioning something, doesn't mean that that something doesn't exist. And I never said it MUST BE but it MAY BE , (because it WAS the case before and because something called "biggest update" could, or even should be a little bigger than what we can see on only the Max route in this update)
- you say: "which is nothing short of either stupidity on your part, or deliberate trolling"
My IQ is 130. What's yours?
- you say: "You were also told that updates focus on one of them each time, never both, which you disagreed with."
Your above statement (apart from not being an answer to my original question but a comment to a comment made by me later) is NOT TRUE! Ever heard of NEVER SAY NEVER? There WERE cases when both routes were in the same update. "Never" means something else.. Not the case in the last 2 updates but there were others before with both routes inside! And something that has been, can be again. Which is why forums exist, to ask questions and to get answers on them not to be called names for asking.
- you say: "The ratio of updates between Kate and Max is an entirely separate thing from what you asked and what you disagreed with."
If it's a "separate thing", how comes that thing should answer my question?
And what i "disagreed with" (not inside my question but later, as a comment to a comment) was the ratio of 1/1 because as I explained above, that was NOT ALWAYS SO! And claiming that it was NEVER different is NOT TRUE!
- you say: "The closest you can get to make an assertion that both received updates at the same time, was the change of engine, which is an extreme technicality that's only of use as trolling. Not for pedantry, just for trolling."
Again WRONG: the "closest I can get" is the FACTS (there were NOT ALWAYS either 1 Kate or 1 Max but sometimes also mixed), not the change of engine, of which I have no idea and about which I never asked. But about which you seem to be "trolling", probably trying to show again how "knowledgeable" you are.
Short said: as long as somebody keeps trying to switch my words or to accuse me of things that I didn't do, i will HAVE TO keep answering. Because I do not accept that!
In fact what you accuse me of is "not assuming" that this update should be 1 route only, based on the fact that other (BUT NOT ALL) updates were 1 route only. Sorry but i do not like to assume or to guess.. I want to KNOW FOR SURE. And when i don't know for sure, I ask!
But with people like you it makes no sense to ask because what you answer is: "hey you idiot, can't you just assume what we assume?" My answer is: NOPE!
Yeah, sure... Couldn't figure out how to save the game and had to come here to ask how. Might want to remove one of those numbers if your reasoning/problem solving is still that bad.
Yes, I remember your "problem" with the FAQ not catering to the special brand of troll that you are.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 934
The question was "What's your IQ" whereby "I" does not stand for "imagination".
Yeah, sure... Couldn't figure out how to save the game and had to come here to ask how. Might want to remove one of those numbers if your reasoning/problem solving is still that bad.
Yes, I remember your "problem" with the FAQ not catering to the special brand of troll that you are.