Yeah, there are redefinitions I'm not a fan of, and I agree with you about the number that should be involved. IDK. They made up a bunch of new tags, felt the need to identify a throuple, and chose a very inaccurate term to do so. I would say that the term
love triangle is inexact at best. The
You must be registered to see the links
is simply when two people love the same third individual. This could happen in several forms, some of which are in direct opposition to each other.
- Girl A and Girl B both love Guy C; Guy C loves both girls back. Both girls accept each other. All three are in a single relationship, together.
- Girl A and Girl B both love Guy C; Guy C loves both girls back. Both girls accept each other. Each girl has a separate relationship with the guy; both spend time / have sex with him, but they never are around each other.
- Girl A and Girl B both love Guy C; Guy C loves both girls back. Neither girl accepts the other, getting very jealous and even extremely antagonistic toward one another.
With the above, gender can be changed around for any of the participants (3 men involved, 3 women involved, a futa-man-woman combination, and so on). All three of those qualify as
love triangle; in fact, in America it's far more common to use the term to mean that one individual has to choose only one of the two partners, and the partners are in direct competition. So that term tells you nothing other than that very basic information.
The term
throuple was created to signify specifically that three individuals are all in a single relationship. That does not specify whether all parties have sex with each other or not. It applies when Girl A and Girl B engage in sex with Girl C but A and B never get physical with each other. So it's also inexact. But it's probably a better term than
love triangle IMO.
It actually all depends. I have no idea about that other game (which you shouldn't post in another game's thread FFR, according to
Posting Rule #2.4). There are a few reasons why this would be labeled as
Abandoned.
- I don't think this would ever have gotten the On Hold label, unless there was some public statement within the first month or so that I don't know about. If this originally would have been labeled as such, it might still now be marked as Abandoned anyway, depending on when the request to put it On Hold was made (see Game Thread Rule 3.1). It's been 7 months since the last update, which would mean more than 6 months if the official statement about on-hold status was made in the first month. So maybe, or maybe not.
- There was no communication for 5 months after the last release (on Patreon, here, or elsewhere as far as I can tell). That silence without any official statement about being On Hold, combined with no game update, means the Abandoned label got applied to the thread (see Game Thread Rule 3.2). And as a subpoint under that same rule, the label cannot get removed from a thread unless there's an actual game update. So until that happens, the label won't change.