- Aug 26, 2019
- 1,349
- 560
Aye, I agree, and 'sorta' disagree .I get the point your trying to make, but I disagree. First, the tag is there because there is incest sex in the game. I mean 1=1 there. I wish there was more too, I want the mom and sister as well. Second, I think that if you just got to have sex with all of them immediately it would be a little hollow though. Have to have some build up and development, right? I mean it is only version 3.
As you said, your opinions and expectations, same as these are mine.
Some 'points' why :
1 - The "teasing", was very much, in-your-face, and a bit, over-whelming, too-much-so.
2 - Just think about this:
If every 'Tag', affixed, to content descriptions, could be/was, 'qualified' by just one scene/event, (not teasing), imagine the chaos, and disappointment, that could create, for players, looking for that specific content, and their expectations, to the quantity & quality, of such, to only find, one piece of content, with-in the game, as it is .
Also, how the 'use' of this, could impact, other Developers, who don't employ these tactics, to ruin the "trust", between game-maker, and game-player. (Bad for All )
Allowing, some "Developers", to profit on that use, of that mechanic, as-in, not needing to provide further, 'proof' for such content, in their product, (especially true, for those who gain 'payment' making games, to provide even less content than some do currently), multiplied by the number of 'tags' currently available, they can use, in this way.
Yellow-highlighted = Well, the Developer, put it out there/teased it, (Mother, & Sister, separate events), and the Incest Tag, implies access to that content , (does it, not?).
What else would one expect, other then, having the option/chance, to obtain it ? ( no option/chance is supplied though).
I'm not sure if I'm explaining this well enough . . . . (If I haven't, well then, I won't try to further).
It's kind of a 'fore-warning'/alert, of what could transpire, if we continue to allow it to .
As said before, My opinion, & expectations . . . . (Hopefully, I'm not 'alone' in this )