Came to say something similar.
Really not a fan of the whole "anti-slavery revolution" plot line.
The main problem is, these sorts of topics are pretty serious, and they need to be treated with a certain amount of gravitas to them. Currently going through the event where
and I can't help but think that this whole event is just an enormous bunch of naive wishful thinking.
I've seen how anti-communist protests looked like in my country. There's no way that 20 college kids would start
anything meaningful enough to bring about
any change. The truth of the matter is, the police wouldn't even need to shoot them, they would just beat them unconscious, arrest them, then drag them into some secluded interrogation room, and only then continue with the
real handiwork. The father, telling his subordinates to lower their guns when he sees his daughter? That's not happening. He has someone above him - if he's the chief in town, then it's the chief of the regional police. If he's the regional chief, then it's the central command. If the state is this hell-bent on stopping anything pertaining to the anti-slavery movement, this sort of social unrest would make national news within an hour, and then the chief head of the police would be coming down on this guy's ass, because if he
didn't, then the politicians would be coming down on
his.
And the best part is - the dad-policeman
would know this. So sure, he might not use live ammo, but he would definitely not stand around for hours on end, just waiting till the college kids get bored with their terrorism make-believe, and instead would just tell his subordinates to overpower a bunch of teenage
girls and make quick work of them within a couple of hours.
The whole event relies on the premise that the public opinion already does not condone the idea of slavery. If the public opinion
did condone the institution, the media being there would mean exactly squat, as the police would catch more flak for not dealing swiftly with the wannabe terrorists, rather than for being violent with them. And if the public opinion does
not, in fact, condone slavery, then there's no point in any revolutions in the first place - you just need to get the word out and connect people together, something which would be already happening sporadically on the internet and in the public spaces.
Instead, we get a feeling that any criticism of the current slavery system is being heavily censored... While at the same time being told that this system is being condoned by the society - you don't need state censorship in a system that is approved by the society.
What the author has created, to me, seems like a world where the government unilaterally introduced the institution of slavery, with most people disagreeing with it, but for some reason they are also at the same time convinced that everyone else condones it - which implies
heavy use of social engineering and governmental propaganda, which in turn implies that the world has much bigger issues than just elves being enslaved.
And all of these topics are entirely fine to explore in fiction - but not in a light-hearted porn game about a dude boning ten chicks in a hotel, inherited from his grandpa. In order to treat these issues with proper respect, you need to plan for this sort of shit from the very beginning and design your story around these concepts - instead, this seems like the author just blindly stumbled into this storyline, and continues to dig deeper, to reach God only knows what.
I loved this game in the start, and I didn't mind some of the heavier plot lines here and there, but this whole anti-slavery revolution storyline has definitely been a turning point for the worse. I was hoping the author would drop it at some point, but I see that the whole thing just keeps escalating, with the author seemingly not understanding the gravitas of such social movements.